AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] vs Globalscape EFT comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Fortra are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Additionally, 75% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortra users who would recommend it.

AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Read 3 AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] reviews

75% willing to recommend

Globalscape EFT

Read 14 Globalscape EFT reviews

2,791 Views
2,707 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Globalscape EFT

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 8, 2025

AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] and Globalscape EFT compete in the domain of secure file transfers. Globalscape EFT has the upper hand due to its advanced security features and flexibility.

Features: AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] integrates with AWS identity and storage, uses AWS management tools, and offers seamless AWS service integration. Globalscape EFT provides comprehensive security controls, advanced automation, and compliance features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] offers intuitive deployment for AWS users, leveraging AWS management tools and customer service. Globalscape EFT provides flexible configurations, robust customer support, and adaptability across different IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] is competitively priced for AWS customers with cost-effective scaling. Globalscape EFT, despite higher initial costs, offers significant ROI through its comprehensive features and security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,099 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Globalscape EFT

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th)

Featured Reviews

Kyle Titus

Chief Technology Officer at Revio

Always works, handles all types of load, and allows us to have S3 files as storage

Its cost needs improvement. In addition, there could be a universal client that works on all desktops. There could be client software that you use to connect to the server. Generally, AWS doesn't provide one for you, so you have to use either your CLI, maybe your SSH CLI, or use some kind of desktop solution. I had to find a desktop app from a third party to run this. Our clients also do the same everywhere else, so it would be nice if the SFTP Gateway solution came with a client that anyone could download on their Mac, Windows, or any other machine.

Read full review

Ravi Kumar Dake

Software Developer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Seamless integration and enhanced automation streamline complex tasks while opportunities exist for improved batch file processing

The best feature of Globalscape EFT is that it has inbuilt encryption. We can use outside PGP encryption or we can use the inbuilt encryption as well, enabling us to do the encryption file transfer to the destinations. The other thing is that, by using the advanced workflow, we can make complex integrations for ease, and the workflow allows us to have alerts and everything by using email notifications through SMTP. We utilize the advanced automation capabilities, and we can also integrate to Azure. In one of the projects, we use Globalscape EFT as an intermediate integration and we use SAP BI where they send the files to Globalscape EFT. We take the files and push them to the banking system, where we get the response and return that back to the SAP system. Globalscape EFT can integrate with the Azure cloud systems as well. We can upload as many files as we can, and we can automate everything using SFTP software such as FileZilla, WinSCP, or any of the SFTP tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature for us is data persistence, because it basically gives you a snapshot history and the solution also offers good data recovery."

"The solution offers good data recovery."

"The solution has helped with collaboration in our organization."

"Being able to have the S3 files as storage is most valuable. We can use S3 as storage instead of an SFTP server or a machine."

"Globalscape EFT allows us to have global connections; for example, there are multiple connections using the same SFTP, so we can add a single tab where we can declare it as a global connection and use it in different exports or imports."

"A job skeleton can be used from test to production so you don't have to build jobs from scratch in production."

"The other solutions were cheaper, but they didn't give us the peace of mind to go to bed and know that we were going to have a good night of sleep, which we get with Globalscape EFT."

"The best feature of Globalscape EFT is that it has inbuilt encryption, and by using the advanced workflow, we can make complex integrations for ease, with alerts and email notifications through SMTP, along with the ability to integrate with Azure and automate everything using SFTP tools."

"We have absolutely realized a return on our investment in Globalscape."

"The most valuable feature is the automation engine, because it allows you to script or program and it has lots of different features and options. It's something like an IDE for programmers, where they can add variables, arrays, loops, et cetera."

"Looking at the product and being trained on it, I find Globalscape to be a great file transmission application."

"The most effective feature is its advanced workflow engine. Another feature is the flexibility of the code we use to create tasks."

More Globalscape EFT pros

Cons

"SFTP would be better if it was more automated, particularly for file transfers."

"The tool's UI should be pretty easy and straightforward. I would also like to see a simple audit report of the SFTP guest account that shows the amount of data transfers and security kind enabled."

"Its cost needs improvement. In addition, there could be a universal client that works on all desktops."

"Instead of using a fat client to access the administrator panel, where you have to install client software on any server that you need to use to access, I would like them to switch to a web-based model where you could connect from anywhere without having to maintain and install the software."

"It could improve its operations by incorporating real-time collaboration features like those offered by platforms such as Microsoft OneDrive and Office 365."

"Currently, with the folder monitoring services in Globalscape, if any changes are made to our firewalls, network, or something else that affects the directory services where the files are located, for some reason, the folder monitoring services get cut out, and the files are left there."

"I do have some complaints or concerns around the centralized platform for the management of file transfer operations, and I know that they're working towards a better solution there. At its core, it's a good feature, but needs some improvements. I would like to see a web interface so that there is universal support across versions, because we have test and production environments that aren't always in sync. It would be nice to have one administrative interface to access both."

"We need some capability for faster transfers and large file transfers. If we want to transfer a terabyte file, it is not capable of doing that right now. They say it is possible, but we are not able to do so with our environment."

"If Globalscape has a higher number of tasks, performance issues will occur."

"There are two ways to install Globalscape: as a standalone server or as a high-availability server, either Active-Active or Active-Standby. We are currently using standalone servers. That means if we want to upgrade the software, I shut down one of the two back-end servers, upgrade the software, make sure everything is correct, and then turn traffic back on to that one. I then proceed to upgrade the second server. With their high-availability solution, that is not a possibility. Both servers have to be shut down to perform the upgrade. We're a 24/7 shop. We don't have a window where we can have downtime."

"Globalscape EFT is prone to errors because one single click can lead to a file being sent to another vendor, and it doesn't give any warning if the code goes out of certain loops."

More Globalscape EFT cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's $249 per month per instance. It's not great; it's pretty pricey. We've got multiple users on that one instance. If we had to build it by hand, we would win on cost there, but obviously, there is effort and time. In terms of the additional costs, they do have some specific pricing, but for our use case, we don't end up going over $249. They do specify in their pricing what they're charging for."

"Maintenance and services for Globalscape EFT have an annual price tag, and it is not cheap."

"It is much more competitively priced. Axway is probably three or four times more expensive than Globalscape. I like the server-based license. It's easier to manage than a seat license, which our previous product Axway had. Axway's license model is to charge by the account while Globalscape's model is by the server. It is much simpler and much easier when audit time comes."

"The on-prem licensing is very good. It's a perpetual license and I would advise others to purchase that license. That way, you don't have to pay yearly."

"We are paying around 30K per year."

"It is a very good product in terms of purchase. It didn't cost that much, even with the way we had scaled and architecturally put things in place. It is definitely comparable to other products."

"A large factor in our decision to go with Globalscape was the price."

"The solution is reasonably priced in comparison to other products."

"Globalscape is not cheap, but you get what you pay for. The cost is worth the value of the product. What you're getting is a good, stable solution that does a lot."

More Globalscape EFT pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Globalscape Managed File Transfer?

I never looked at the pricing for Globalscape EFT because it was at the management level where my line manager handled it. I was a team lead, so we only did the RFQs and everything. I never had a c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Globalscape Managed File Transfer?

Globalscape EFT is prone to errors because one single click can lead to a file being sent to another vendor, and it doesn't give any warning if the code goes out of certain loops. The user interfac...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Globalscape Managed File Transfer?

Currently, I'm working on Globalscape EFT 2020. The usual use cases for Globalscape EFT that we are applying involve imports and data that we send from our organization to different vendors, and so...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kiteworks vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Control-M vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

MOVEit vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Competitors

Control-M vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 13% of the time

MOVEit vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 11% of the time

MetaDefender Managed File Transfer (MFT) vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 10% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 8% of the time

More Globalscape EFT Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

July 2026

Download AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Globalscape EFT

August 2026

Download Globalscape EFT product report

Also Known As

No data available

Globalscape GlobalSCAPE Managed File Transfer

Overview

AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Globalscape EFT enhances productivity through secure and location-independent data sharing. It features robust automation, integration with Windows and Linux, and a centralized interface for ease of use, making it ideal for seamless file transfer management and compliance.

Globalscape EFT specializes in secure file transfers between internal and external systems, supporting multiple encryption methods. It utilizes strong workflow automation and auditing tools, making it suitable for complex regulatory documentation. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Salesforce for enhanced data management and is deployable both on-premises and cloud environments. Though it excels in many areas, improvements are needed in real-time collaboration and transfer speed for large files.

What are the key features of Globalscape EFT?

Location-Agnostic Data Sharing: Provides productivity tools for secure transfers regardless of user location.
Data Loss Prevention and PGP Encryption: Ensures secure data transmissions with enhanced protection.
Centralized Interface: Facilitates ease of use for file management and administration.
Powerful Automation: Streamlines complex workflows efficiently.
Advanced Workflow Engine: Supports challenging regulatory tasks.
Integration Options: Compatible with Windows, Linux, and systems like Salesforce.
Comprehensive Auditing Tools: Offers detailed insights into data management activities.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Productivity: Facilitates efficient and secure file sharing.
Improved Compliance: Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements.
Streamlined Data Management: Automates processes for ease of operation.
Seamless System Integration: Connects with existing enterprise systems effortlessly.

Globalscape EFT is widely used in industries requiring secure data exchanges, such as finance and healthcare. Organizations utilize its event rules to automate workflows, connect with global financial networks, and meet compliance demands effectively. Its deployment flexibility supports both on-premises and cloud applications, catering to diverse operational environments.

Fortra

Sample Customers

Myriota, FINRA, Celgene, Kontor New Media, Belong, ThinkCX, BluTV

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.