AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] vs Globalscape EFT comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Fortra are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Additionally, 75% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortra users who would recommend it.

AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Read 3 AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] reviews

75% willing to recommend

Globalscape EFT

Read 14 Globalscape EFT reviews

3,527 Views
3,421 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Globalscape EFT

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

AWS Transfer for SFTP EOL and Globalscape EFT compete in secure file transfer services. Globalscape EFT seems to have the upper hand in features and customer satisfaction, though AWS Transfer for SFTP EOL is competitive in pricing.

Features: AWS Transfer for SFTP EOL provides seamless integration with AWS services, automatic scaling, and high availability, making it ideal for AWS ecosystems. Globalscape EFT offers advanced security features, scalability beyond SFTP, and extensive automation capabilities, appealing to enterprises with complex security and compliance requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Transfer for SFTP EOL benefits from AWS's cloud-native architecture with quick setup for those familiar with AWS, though it may lack comprehensive support. Globalscape EFT has a more involved setup but is offset by robust customer support and consulting services, placing great emphasis on personalized service, enhancing the deployment experience.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Transfer for SFTP EOL presents a cost-effective solution for AWS-centric businesses with a clear usage-based pricing model that can lead to favorable ROI when integrated within AWS environments. Globalscape EFT involves higher initial setup costs but offers substantial returns for businesses needing multifaceted file transfer management, with a focus on long-term ROI potential despite the higher upfront investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Globalscape EFT

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th)

Featured Reviews

Kyle Titus

Chief Technology Officer at Revio

Always works, handles all types of load, and allows us to have S3 files as storage

Its cost needs improvement. In addition, there could be a universal client that works on all desktops. There could be client software that you use to connect to the server. Generally, AWS doesn't provide one for you, so you have to use either your CLI, maybe your SSH CLI, or use some kind of desktop solution. I had to find a desktop app from a third party to run this. Our clients also do the same everywhere else, so it would be nice if the SFTP Gateway solution came with a client that anyone could download on their Mac, Windows, or any other machine.

Read full review

Ravi Kumar Dake

Software Developer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Seamless integration and enhanced automation streamline complex tasks while opportunities exist for improved batch file processing

The best feature of Globalscape EFT is that it has inbuilt encryption. We can use outside PGP encryption or we can use the inbuilt encryption as well, enabling us to do the encryption file transfer to the destinations. The other thing is that, by using the advanced workflow, we can make complex integrations for ease, and the workflow allows us to have alerts and everything by using email notifications through SMTP. We utilize the advanced automation capabilities, and we can also integrate to Azure. In one of the projects, we use Globalscape EFT as an intermediate integration and we use SAP BI where they send the files to Globalscape EFT. We take the files and push them to the banking system, where we get the response and return that back to the SAP system. Globalscape EFT can integrate with the Azure cloud systems as well. We can upload as many files as we can, and we can automate everything using SFTP software such as FileZilla, WinSCP, or any of the SFTP tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature for us is data persistence, because it basically gives you a snapshot history and the solution also offers good data recovery."

"The solution has helped with collaboration in our organization."

"Being able to have the S3 files as storage is most valuable. We can use S3 as storage instead of an SFTP server or a machine."

"The solution offers good data recovery."

"It bolsters security with features like Data Loss Prevention and seamless integration with DLP for a safe and compliant environment which enables real-time document sharing and control over file actions."

"It made things easier. Before, there were five to 10 different software solutions spread out over 10 different servers. Now, everything is being centralized into one location; facilitating, supporting, maintaining, training people, etc. There have been gains just because Globalscape EFT is more efficient at moving things around than our previous other applications. For instance, if I am connecting to someone over the Internet or transmitting for the client, the speed of transmitting those files through SFTP is 20% to 30% faster than our previous automated solution. Therefore, we have seen time savings."

"Looking at the product and being trained on it, I find Globalscape to be a great file transmission application."

"The most valuable feature is the automation engine, because it allows you to script or program and it has lots of different features and options. It's something like an IDE for programmers, where they can add variables, arrays, loops, et cetera."

"The other solutions were cheaper, but they didn't give us the peace of mind to go to bed and know that we were going to have a good night of sleep, which we get with Globalscape EFT."

"Globalscape EFT allows us to have global connections; for example, there are multiple connections using the same SFTP, so we can add a single tab where we can declare it as a global connection and use it in different exports or imports."

"By going with Globalscape, we have been able to decommission Sterling B2B Integrator, Connect Enterprise, MOVEit, and soon, ExaVault, and that has streamlined and standardized our processes, drastically, and has helped with cost savings."

"Previously, we had multiple tools for file transfer; with GlobalSCAPE, we can meet all the business requirements, and its multiple options like folder monitoring and scheduled jobs make it a real-time file transfer solution."

More Globalscape EFT pros

Cons

"SFTP would be better if it was more automated, particularly for file transfers."

"The tool's UI should be pretty easy and straightforward. I would also like to see a simple audit report of the SFTP guest account that shows the amount of data transfers and security kind enabled."

"Its cost needs improvement. In addition, there could be a universal client that works on all desktops."

"We need some capability for faster transfers and large file transfers. If we want to transfer a terabyte file, it is not capable of doing that right now. They say it is possible, but we are not able to do so with our environment."

"In the beginning, it could be considered a bit challenging."

"I do have some complaints or concerns around the centralized platform for the management of file transfer operations, and I know that they're working towards a better solution there. At its core, it's a good feature, but needs some improvements. I would like to see a web interface so that there is universal support across versions, because we have test and production environments that aren't always in sync. It would be nice to have one administrative interface to access both."

"Another area for improvement is the ARM (Auditing and Reporting Module) database, in terms of accuracy and the data being logged."

"With their high-availability solution, that is not a possibility. Both servers have to be shut down to perform the upgrade."

"It could improve its operations by incorporating real-time collaboration features like those offered by platforms such as Microsoft OneDrive and Office 365."

"If Globalscape has a higher number of tasks, performance issues will occur."

"The solution lags a bit when thousands of jobs, multiple users, and multiple developers are accessing it at the same time."

More Globalscape EFT cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's $249 per month per instance. It's not great; it's pretty pricey. We've got multiple users on that one instance. If we had to build it by hand, we would win on cost there, but obviously, there is effort and time. In terms of the additional costs, they do have some specific pricing, but for our use case, we don't end up going over $249. They do specify in their pricing what they're charging for."

"It offers excellent value and its pricing is straightforward, making it easy to acquire, set up, and use."

"The solution is reasonably priced in comparison to other products."

"We are paying around 30K per year."

"Maintenance and services for Globalscape EFT have an annual price tag, and it is not cheap."

"It is much more competitively priced. Axway is probably three or four times more expensive than Globalscape. I like the server-based license. It's easier to manage than a seat license, which our previous product Axway had. Axway's license model is to charge by the account while Globalscape's model is by the server. It is much simpler and much easier when audit time comes."

"It is a very good product in terms of purchase. It didn't cost that much, even with the way we had scaled and architecturally put things in place. It is definitely comparable to other products."

"A large factor in our decision to go with Globalscape was the price."

"Globalscape is not cheap, but you get what you pay for. The cost is worth the value of the product. What you're getting is a good, stable solution that does a lot."

More Globalscape EFT pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

14%

Healthcare Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Globalscape Managed File Transfer?

I never looked at the pricing for Globalscape EFT because it was at the management level where my line manager handled it. I was a team lead, so we only did the RFQs and everything. I never had a c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Globalscape Managed File Transfer?

Globalscape EFT is prone to errors because one single click can lead to a file being sent to another vendor, and it doesn't give any warning if the code goes out of certain loops. The user interfac...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Globalscape Managed File Transfer?

Currently, I'm working on Globalscape EFT 2020. The usual use cases for Globalscape EFT that we are applying involve imports and data that we send from our organization to different vendors, and so...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kiteworks vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Control-M vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Progress MOVEit vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Competitors

Control-M vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 12% of the time

Progress MOVEit vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 12% of the time

MetaDefender Managed File Transfer (MFT) vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 9% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 7% of the time

More Globalscape EFT Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2026

Download AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Globalscape EFT

October 2026

Download Globalscape EFT product report

Also Known As

No data available

Globalscape GlobalSCAPE Managed File Transfer

Overview

AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Globalscape EFT enhances productivity through secure and location-independent data sharing. It features robust automation, integration with Windows and Linux, and a centralized interface for ease of use, making it ideal for seamless file transfer management and compliance.

Globalscape EFT specializes in secure file transfers between internal and external systems, supporting multiple encryption methods. It utilizes strong workflow automation and auditing tools, making it suitable for complex regulatory documentation. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Salesforce for enhanced data management and is deployable both on-premises and cloud environments. Though it excels in many areas, improvements are needed in real-time collaboration and transfer speed for large files.

What are the key features of Globalscape EFT?

Location-Agnostic Data Sharing: Provides productivity tools for secure transfers regardless of user location.
Data Loss Prevention and PGP Encryption: Ensures secure data transmissions with enhanced protection.
Centralized Interface: Facilitates ease of use for file management and administration.
Powerful Automation: Streamlines complex workflows efficiently.
Advanced Workflow Engine: Supports challenging regulatory tasks.
Integration Options: Compatible with Windows, Linux, and systems like Salesforce.
Comprehensive Auditing Tools: Offers detailed insights into data management activities.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Productivity: Facilitates efficient and secure file sharing.
Improved Compliance: Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements.
Streamlined Data Management: Automates processes for ease of operation.
Seamless System Integration: Connects with existing enterprise systems effortlessly.

Globalscape EFT is widely used in industries requiring secure data exchanges, such as finance and healthcare. Organizations utilize its event rules to automate workflows, connect with global financial networks, and meet compliance demands effectively. Its deployment flexibility supports both on-premises and cloud applications, catering to diverse operational environments.

Fortra

Sample Customers

Myriota, FINRA, Celgene, Kontor New Media, Belong, ThinkCX, BluTV

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra, BMC, Progress Software and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.