Amazon FSx Reviews

Name: Amazon FSx
Brand: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Rating: 4.2 (4 reviews)

4.2 out of 5

4 reviews
100% willing to recommend

What is Amazon FSx?

Amazon FSx makes it easy and cost effective to launch and run popular file systems. With Amazon FSx, you can leverage the rich feature sets and fast performance of widely-used open source and commercially-licensed file systems, while avoiding time-consuming administrative tasks like hardware provisioning, software configuration, patching, and backups. It provides cost-efficient capacity and high levels of reliability, and it integrates with other AWS services so that you can manage and use the file systems in cloud-native ways.

Get the Cloud Storage Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Amazon FSx, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Dell PowerScale (Isilon) and more!

Amazon FSx is the #4 ranked solution in top File System Software solutions, #14 ranked solution in top Cloud Storage solutions, and #16 ranked solution in top File and Object Storage solutions. PeerSpot users give Amazon FSx an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Amazon FSx is most commonly compared to Red Hat Ceph Storage: Amazon FSx vs Red Hat Ceph Storage. Amazon FSx is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 63% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 15% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

June 2025

Get the category report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Featured Amazon FSx reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Amazon FSx is more costly compared to other storage solutions like EBS or EFS. The auto-scaling feature should be improved, as it currently includes downtime. I need to manually increase the storage, which is not ideal. Integrating FSx with Windows Server is challenging; it's a long process involving Active Directory (AD) setup and synchronization.

Read full review

KhaderNawaz

Solution Architect at Virtusa Global

Currently, our use case involves moving shared folders on-premises to FSx for cloud-based storage The use of cloud technology saves time by reducing the need for infrastructure maintenance. It allows for dynamic scaling and efficient resource utilization. FSx operates as an independent service,…

Read full review

Sugan Balakrishnan

Senior Design Engineer at Clovertex

From my experience, there are areas in Amazon FSx where more performance is needed, as they will be looking for higher IOPS. Sometimes we go with Weka or other solutions due to this need, so it should have more IO capacity when there is a demand. More performance is needed specifically in the IO area.

Read full review

Amazon FSx mindshare

Product category:

As of June 2025, the mindshare of Amazon FSx in the Cloud Storage category stands at 4.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage

Key learnings from peers

Last updated Jun 1, 2025

Valuable Features

Amazon FSx offers valuable features for disaster recovery, shared storage across enterprise environments, and scalability. Its independent operation eliminates dependencies, and the cloud provider manages backups and administrative tasks. Medium and large enterprises find it beneficial for data sharing. FSx is suitable for high-performance computing with high IO needs, and it performs well for native requirements. Although there may be alternatives like Weka, FSx remains a strong choice for its primary features.

"On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Amazon FSx a ten."
"I rate the stability of Amazon FSx ten out of ten."
"The shared storage capability is highly valuable."

Room for Improvement

AWS console's refresh lag during FSx failovers and inadequate sync mirroring are noted. Users highlight insufficient FSx documentation and training similar to other AWS tools. Costs are higher than alternatives like EBS or EFS, and auto-scaling involves downtime. Integrating with Windows Server is cumbersome. Improved IO performance is necessary as users occasionally opt for other solutions due to higher IOPS demands. Direct FTP features could enhance effectiveness by bypassing transmission services.

"From my experience, there are areas in Amazon FSx where more performance is needed, as they will be looking for higher IOPS."
"Amazon FSx is more costly compared to other storage solutions like EBS or EFS."
"Amazon FSx is more costly compared to other storage solutions like EBS or EFS."

Pricing

"The lowest price I have paid is $370 or $380 per month, while the highest can exceed $3,000 per month."

Popular Use Cases

Amazon FSx is primarily utilized for databases requiring failover and recovery support, shared storage for Windows servers, and transferring on-premises shared folders to cloud-based storage. It is favored by life science and pharmaceutical industries, focusing on high-performance computing. Customers often aim to store data on S3 using FSx. It serves small to medium businesses needing robust shared resources, ensuring reliable disaster recovery and cloud integration within AWS environments.

Deployment

Users found Amazon FSx's initial setup straightforward, rating it high. It supports seamless data integration, taking around five to seven minutes for deployment. However, they highlight limitations in switchover support and seek improvements for active-active mode efficiency. Failover works well but requires a page refresh for synchronization update. Active Directory integration poses some challenges. They predominantly use Amazon FSx for cloud-based migrations in hybrid environments, finding its performance comparable to Oracle and MySQL in disaster recovery scenarios.

Scalability

Amazon FSx exhibits high scalability, earning ratings of eight to ten from users. Teams working globally appreciate its flexibility, supporting dynamic mounting and closure. Planning is crucial to leverage full scalability, with primary concerns centered on server capacity rather than storage.

Stability

Amazon FSx shows strong reliability. Users mention occasional interface refresh delays, particularly in AWS Console, leading to accessibility concerns during changes. Despite these delays, a high-rated stability experience is reported, affected by configuration and high availability setup. Service agreements ensure AWS support responsiveness. Some users rate it as optimal, while others face minimal issues. Stability ratings range from eight to ten out of ten.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Cloud Storage Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

University

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Pharma/Biotech Company

Media Company

Hospitality Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Government

Marketing Services Firm

Performing Arts

Energy/Utilities Company

Non Profit

Recruiting/Hr Firm

Photography Company

Legal Firm

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Compare Amazon FSx with alternative products

Learn more about Amazon FSx

Amazon FSx provides you with two file systems to choose from: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server for enterprise workloads and Amazon FSx for Lustre for high-performance workloads.

Amazon FSx was previously known as Amazon FSx for Windows File Server, Amazon FSx for Lustre.