Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more
2018-11-18T11:56:00Z
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 11
  • 8564

What Is The Biggest Difference Between Nutanix And VMware vSAN?

Hi peers, 

One of the most popular comparisons on IT Central Station is Nutanix vs VMware vSAN.

People like you are trying to decide which one is best for their company. Can you help them out?

What is the biggest difference between Nutanix and VMware vSAN? Which of these two solutions would you recommend to a colleague evaluating hyper-converged solutions and why?

Thanks for helping your peers make the best decision!

12
PeerSpot user
12 Answers
Bob Whitcombe - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Sales Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2018-12-06T18:05:30Z
06 December 18

I have written about this comparison before – the difference between Nutanix and VMware VSAN is like a Stanich Garage Grinder (Rated best burger in the US) vs getting a slab of Romaine Lettuce from California.

Nutanix is a full meal deal – Vmware VSAN is a single ingredient in a complex stew including VSphere, VCloud Director, vRealize Automation, vRealize Ops, NSX, Log Insight, Network Insight, CodeStream, Orchestrator and don’t forget – AirWatch. If you already have the meat and buns (VSphere, VCloud) and some vRealize condiments – you can add VSAN and make a decent burger. But it takes a lot of work, you have to juggle a lot of ingredients and each time you build a new cluster – it looks different. Or, I can order Nutanix, place it on a recommended HCI architecture from Dell, HPE or Cisco – and get a single pane of glass to securely manage and backup my environment.

Being from Oregon – I recall the many Garbage Grinders I had at Stanich’s and vividly recall the savory delight of the complex burger they put out.
I paid $5.95 for my first GG and you could probably save the $.95 by getting your own White box infrastructure – add VSAN as long as you already have licenses for the buns, meat and other condiments. Now if you have abundant time to put them all together and the attention to detail to manage everything you might get to keep your $.95 in savings. But you will some gaps, security and backup, and these days – that is not a savings – that is putting your customers at risk and your operations gaining a new Target like Identity. BTW – I no longer stay at the Marriott either.

Product comparison that may be of interest to you
PeerSpot user
Client Executive at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2018-12-06T20:49:33Z
06 December 18

The BIGGEST difference is that vSAN only runs on the ESX Hypervisor. Whereas Nutanix runs on multiple Hypervisors including ESX, Hyper-V and their own Acropolis Hyper Visor (AHV).
The second main difference is the cost, as the Nutanix software boasts a much larger range of features included in the toolsuit. Where as with vSAN, a lot of the extraneous functionality can be taken up by other vmWare apps (vSphere, vCenter, etc...)
Finally, vSAN requires a minimum of two (2) nodes whereas Nutanix needs three (3).

PL
IT Manager with 51-200 employees
User
2018-12-06T13:58:45Z
06 December 18

When we were looking at replacing our server infrastructure of 10 physical boxes and 5 VMs, I was thinking of going the traditional route of 2 large servers, a SAN and use VMware to run the servers. Then I decided to look at hyperconverged solutions. Looking at what was on the market we settled on a single Nutanix block with 3 nodes for the following reasons:

1. License cost of Nutanix’s AHV versus VMWare
2. Online training to support the hyperconverged environment, mostly free
3. Nutanix ‘FILES’ SAN/NAS solution saved me license cost
4. Single glass for managing both hardware and VM’s
5. Reduction in System Administrator workload
6. Seamless software upgrades (we were able to do them over lunch with no downtime)
7. Nutanix device takes up only 2u of rack space

DarrylHollingsworth - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Architect, Principal at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2018-12-07T15:45:31Z
07 December 18

In my opinion, the biggest difference between Nutanix and VMware vSAN is flexibility and choice.

vSAN requires the VMware Hypervisor. Nutanix allows you the flexibility to select the Hypervisor of your choice (fully supported). Namely:
AHV ( NUTANIX’s Free native KVM based Hypervisor)
Hyper-V (Microsoft’s Hypervisor)
ESXi ( VMware's Hypervisor)
XenServer ( CITRIX's Hypervisor)

In addition, to partnerships with each of the Vendors above, Nutanix also has built in support-integration with the leading Public Cloud platforms (AWS, GCP, and AZURE).
This integration allows you to easily build a out a Hybrid-Cloud environment as well...

Jeff Caffey - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect / Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2018-12-07T15:34:07Z
07 December 18

From a physical hardware perspective, both Nutanix and VMware vSAN have similar offerings. (There are "2U solutions" that support 4-nodes for vSAN as well.) My recommendation is to list the features you ACTUALLY NEED first, then compare your list against both products. If an obvious winner doesn't appear, then start comparing the remaining features of each product to your business goals.

EB
Director Sales and Market with 51-200 employees
User
2018-12-07T11:18:57Z
07 December 18

Quick answer:

The biggest difference between Nutanix and VMware vSAN is the ability to choose.

* With Nutanix you may choose type of Hypervisor (VMware, MS Hyper-V or AHV)
* Flexibility in growing with different node types is wider – CPU Nodes, Storage Nodes, Object based storage, block based and File based – all in one solution.
* A total of 12 different SW based solutions to help you automate and manage your “Cloud environments” whether is your own Cloud or some others Cloud (private or public).

Speed of deployment and less complexity is another difference.

As there are blueprints and API’s “ready to go” with Nutanix there is far more integration and consultancy hours to integrate a VMware based vSAN solution with more advanced functionality (NSXi +++).

Though Nutanix needs to use AHV Hypervisor to do their “magic” the functionality is fare more easy to deploy and manage over time with little consultancy cost. In a long term scenario this is where the big difference in “total cost” matters .

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs. VMware vSAN and other solutions. Updated: August 2022.
635,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JH
MBA Candidate and Consortium Fellow at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
User
2018-12-07T04:38:16Z
07 December 18

The biggest reason to go with vSAN is the easy of management, troubleshooting and learning curve/overhead. Nutanix can be complicated and complex.

it_user887781 - PeerSpot reviewer
Operations Control / Resource Management with 1-10 employees
User
2018-12-10T14:34:23Z
10 December 18

Spontaneously I would come up with the good management, as well as many years of experience in this environment.

Negative is the high price, above all, this is difficult to enforce in German SMEs (0 - 500 IT seats). In this environment max. three servers needed.

Furthermore, the environment is not very dynamic, so some of the added value of Nutanix is not so good here.

Other negative points are the high prices for retrofitting with RAM, this point concerns only the own Nutanix (Supermicro) hardware, these prices are not available to the customer.

EO
Senior Account Manager at symphony
Vendor
2018-12-07T09:59:44Z
07 December 18

https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/8oq5oi/nutanix_vs_vmware_vsan/

PeerSpot user
Presales Director at AspireNXT
Consultant
2018-12-07T04:44:02Z
07 December 18

With the advent of HCI architectures, there has been a flurry of solution(s) available each with their own claims and architectures. While all of them follow a Scale-Out architecture , with the use of commodity servers , each have their own strengths and a simple comparison (Excel Sheet) is something that one should not attempt .

I would suggest a holistic approach by looking deep inside on what you want to achieve. Work Loads, compatibility with your current backup strategy and investments, futuristic technologies such as microsegmentation.
Both VMware vSAN and Nutanix are SDS .
1. Licensing of vSAN has a trend to be more economical compared to Nutanix. Said that feature integration with Nutanix has always been quicker on the development curve.
2. There is a host of training materials provided by both vendors. In order to get you up and running most of them are provided with no additional charge. Exceptions are there, should you require to pursue your strengths to much deeper and higher levels.

User
2018-12-07T03:46:09Z
07 December 18

As my understanding, Nutanix is software based shared storage it may limit you to its brand.
VMware vSAN is also software based shared storage BUT its NOT limit you to any brand.
VMware vSAN require minimum 3 node (one as witness).
From my point of view, VMware vSAN is more flexible.

PeerSpot user
VP Sales Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2018-12-06T19:30:31Z
06 December 18

Hi, I think that if you are using now VMware software , is better keep using this platform and only add de San option, you don't need to learn new Administrations tools, you only new the interface of Van in the same VMware Administrator interface and that it. Technical are different but not too much, You will replace your actual servers with 3 new ones, in VMware Cluster using Vsan option, I hope I can answer your question.

Related Questions
Daniel Wicaksono - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at astra credit companies
Feb 02, 2022
Hi community, I work as a System Engineer at a large Financial Services company (size: 1000+ employees). Currently, I've been looking at the following HCI solutions: Nutanix Acropolis AOS and VMware vSAN.  Which of them would you recommend to my company? Otherwise, should I explore any alternative enterprise solution? Please let me know why. Thanks in advance for your help!
2 out of 10 answers
KK
General Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
26 January 22
I strongly recommend you looking at dHCI Nimble or Alletra from HPE. 
Vebjorn Nergaard - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior IT Engineer at Guard Automation AS
26 January 22
Hi.  We have deployed VmWare vSAN to some of our customers. The advantage with VmWare vSAN is that the vSAN software is integrated in ESX. So, you do not need to deploy virtual SAN as VM's. But you need a Witness VM, wich is a virtual ESX - so it will appear as two machines - little confusing in the beginning.  For small deployment (ROBO), you can have a two node cluster, with vcenter installed on the vSAN. This is a cost-effective solution. But keep in mind, the HCL from VmWare - all hardware has to be approved (on the vSAN Hardware Compability List). We have also been searching for a solution to replace the EOL HPE VSA (StorVirtual). Here we came across StoreMagic SvSAN - we have deployed this to a Hyper-V customer. It also runs on VMware vSphere. This is also a brilliant solution and very cost-effective. The deployment scenario is often ROBO (Remote Office Branch Office), but it can scale up.  In a two-node scenario, you can connect 10Gb Eth direct between the two nodes, for synchronization. This works for both VmWare vSAN and Store MAgic SvSAN.
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Nov 07, 2021
Which is better and why?
See 1 answer
07 November 21
We found VMware’s vSAN was easy to set up, configure, and manage compared to other solutions we considered. It is best suited for small- to medium-sized organizations. It is easy to create load balancing and clusters and create and delete virtual servers using VMware VSan. The deduplication and compression are excellent. On the DevOps side, it would be more helpful if VMware vSAN could provide more automation. It would be an additional improvement if it integrated better with other platforms. Troubleshooting can be problematic; some of our clients need to monitor the solution on a daily basis, which is not so efficient. In terms of tiering and caching, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is wonderful. We found it to be very resilient and we never felt our data was at risk. You can build clusters as you want using various generations of hardware, which helps make this solution very scalable. The online documentation with Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct could be improved, though. We feel that this solution needs to have an intuitive streamline, which would make it more acceptable to clients. Currently, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct does not offer a cloud version. Conclusion: When we were testing out HCI solutions, we were looking for clients that were primarily small- to medium-sized organizations, many of whom were already involved in partnerships with VMware. Our clients were very familiar with the product and happy with it. Overall VMware vSAN has a very simple structure that is very easy to use, implement and manage. The pricing is very competitive as well. Our team and clients are very happy using VMware vSAN.
Related Articles
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Apr 12, 2022
PeerSpot’s crowdsourced user review platform helps technology decision-makers around the world to better connect with peers and other independent experts who provide advice without vendor bias. Our users have ranked these solutions according to their valuable features, and discuss which features they like most and why. You can read user reviews for the Top 5 Software Defined Storage (SDS) Sol...
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Mar 02, 2022
PeerSpot takes a user-centered approach to creating product comparisons that help IT decision-makers arrive at informed decisions. Instead of relying on the word of the companies that create the technological solutions, we go to the users themselves. Real users offer true feedback without any of the partiality that vendors may have. This is a place where peers in the tech world unite to help ea...
Related Articles
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Apr 12, 2022
Best Software Defined Storage (SDS) Solutions 2022
PeerSpot’s crowdsourced user review platform helps technology decision-makers around the world to...
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Mar 02, 2022
Top 5 HCI in 2022
PeerSpot takes a user-centered approach to creating product comparisons that help IT decision-mak...
Download Free Report
Download our free Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
635,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.