Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines.
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Firewall Security Management | Jun 1, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 1, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Tufin Orchestration Suite vs AlgoSec | Jun 1, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Tufin Orchestration Suite vs FireMon Security Manager | Jun 1, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Tufin Orchestration Suite vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud | Jun 1, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlgoSec | 4.5 | 23.0% | 96% | 183 interviewsAdd to research |
| FireMon Security Manager | 4.1 | 17.1% | 87% | 56 interviewsAdd to research |
Tufin Orchestration Suite was previously known as Tufin SecureCloud.
3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service
We use it to manage our policies, consolidate them, and if we see anything missing, we can use it to track that, as well.
Right now, we're mainly on-premise. S,o the cloud piece is not being used right now. However, in the future, we will use it. I think it will help tremendously to get a good picture across the board.
One of the main things is to look at what policies haven't been hit, so we can remove those remnant policies when people come in, use it, and it's still left on the Check Point. So when a couple of users say, "This is not needed anymore." We'll remove it.
The capability to manage: We have different domains, so we want to have a single pane of glass to see what all the different policies are doing.
We like the change impact analysis capabilities quite a bit. The only weakness is that the reporting is a bit clunky. We would like to have the reporting be better.
Right now, it is being used retroactively. There was talk with the rep this morning that they can do this proactively. In other words, we see the policy, and if it's not needed, then it can be removed, or add new policies, as needed.
We feel that it is a very good solution. So, we'll probably use it going forward.
This is one of the things that we do like about the solution, which is why we went with it.
The technical support has been very good. I would like it to be a little faster, but it's good.
There were some hiccups in the initial setup. In using the new features, there was a learning curve. However, for the most part, it was fairly straightforward.
We hired people that have done the deployment in the past. So, we did it all ourselves.
Manually looking at the policies is very time-consuming. With this product, I think we've streamlined the process tremendously.
We like the visibility. That's why we went with this solution over other competitors.
It does what it needs to do for our needs.
We are in the process of doing a PoC for the new changes.
Currently, it's all reactive. We do the changes, then we review it at a later time.
