No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

3.7 out of 5

39 reviews
78% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers, supporting the banking industry, simplifies automation with object repository functions but struggles with unstable test execution and lacks parallel browser testing. While Micro Focus UFT Developer offers flexibility and LeanFT supports multiple protocols, both need faster startup and updated integrations for .NET and Visual Studio. High pricing affects competitiveness, overshadowing benefits like reduced lead time and increased productivity. Improved object recognition, particularly with calendar controls, is essential.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers accelerates software testing automation, reducing lead time and increasing productivity.

It integrates well with other products and testing frameworks like Visual Studio, enhancing its versatility.

The tool supports regulation compliance for industries like banking, making it trustworthy for sensitive applications.

The object repository function simplifies object identification, significantly cutting down on automation testing development time.

The tool is scalable and supports testing across various protocols and applications, including SAP, Siebel, .Net, and pdf.

CONS

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support.

The parallel execution of tests needs improvement, particularly in executing tests simultaneously across different browsers like IE, Microsoft Edge, Chrome, and Mozilla.

It requires high-level development skills, and scripting is essential, making it development-intensive and unsuitable for teams without software engineering backgrounds.

The support for .NET Framework and Visual Studio is limited, only supporting Visual Studio 2019 and up to .NET Framework version 4.3.8 despite newer releases.

Object definition and recognition need improvement, especially with calendar controls, schedulers, and calendars, making customized solutions often necessary.

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Pros review quotes

SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.

Apr 14, 2025

OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.

Read full review

RS

Performance Lead Manager at Wipro Limited

Jul 1, 2024

In UFT, it's a simple click to insert the checkpoints.

Read full review

Process Architect Referent at Forvia

Nov 5, 2024

OpenText UFT Developer works well with record technology, making it valuable for recording.

Read full review

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Functional Testing for Developers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.

892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation

Jan 4, 2024

There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.

Read full review

SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.

Mar 9, 2023

One aspect that I like about Micro Focus UFT Developer is the ability to integrate it into a testing framework as a library.

Read full review

Carlos Kenji Nascimuto

Analista de testes sênior at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees

Aug 15, 2024

I like the tool because we can still access the devices' distance. It's not important where you're working. For example, I can use it in Brazil, Chile, and other parts where people are working. After the pandemic, many companies use it for homework. I think using it to administer and manage the devices is very good and effective.

Read full review

Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Oct 19, 2022

The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT Developer is the flexibility to work with many different types of software.

Read full review

reviewer1311780

Leading SAP Testing Program at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

May 22, 2021

It is quite stable, and it has got very user-friendly features, which are important in terms of maintaining our scripts from a long-term perspective. It is very stable for desktop-based, UI-based, and mobile applications. Object repositories and other features are also quite good.

Read full review

DG

Senior Specialist - Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees

Apr 13, 2021

The most valuable feature for UFT is the ability to test a desktop application.

Read full review

reviewer1475940

Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

Mar 30, 2021

The solution is very scalable.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 37)

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Cons review quotes

SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.

Apr 14, 2025

In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary. This limits the technology's ability to recognize every object.

Read full review

RS

Performance Lead Manager at Wipro Limited

Jul 1, 2024

There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad.

Read full review

Process Architect Referent at Forvia

Nov 5, 2024

The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites.

Read full review

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Functional Testing for Developers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.

892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation

Jan 4, 2024

Object definition and recognition need improvement, especially with calendar controls. I faced challenges with schedulers and calendars.

Read full review

SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.

Mar 9, 2023

The support for .NET Framework and Visual Studio in Micro Focus UFT Developer is currently limited. At present, only Visual Studio 2019 is supported, despite the release of a newer version (2022). Similarly, the tool only supports up to .NET Framework version 4.3.8, while there have been six newer versions released. This is an area that could be improved upon, particularly in the Windows environment.

Read full review

Carlos Kenji Nascimuto

Analista de testes sênior at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees

Aug 15, 2024

Stability depends on the company's infrastructure and end-to-end infrastructure. When I used the tool in my project, we had a big problem with many users using it simultaneously.

Read full review

Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Oct 19, 2022

The price of the solution could improve.

Read full review

reviewer1311780

Leading SAP Testing Program at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

May 22, 2021

UFT Developer is good, but it requires high-level development skills. Scripting is something that everybody should know to be able to work with this product. Currently, it is very development intensive, and you need to know various scripting languages. It would be good if the development effort could be cut short, and it can be scriptless like Tosca. It will help in more adoption because not every team has people with a software engineering background. If it is scriptless, the analysts who wear multiple hats and come from different backgrounds can also use it in a friendly manner. It is also quite expensive.

Read full review

DG

Senior Specialist - Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees

Apr 13, 2021

I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability.

Read full review

reviewer1475940

Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

Mar 30, 2021

The pricing could be improved.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 37)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Functional Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

BrowserStack vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Eggplant Test vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Functional Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

BrowserStack vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Eggplant Test vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

See all alternatives

Related questions

27

Which product supports Cross Browser Testing: UFT Developer or UFT One?

39

Cross-Platform Automated Testing Tool

82

Anyone have a good example of a Test Automation Business Case?

51

When evaluating Functional Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

47

What is the best automation tool to test dynamic data?

63

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

61

Tosca Testsuite Version 10.0

61

What is the best tool for SAP testing?

88

Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?

91

What are some common causes for software failure?