Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText UFT Developer pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText

3.7 out of 5

38 reviews
77% willing to recommend

2,181 followers

Pros & Cons summary

OpenText UFT Developer meets banking industry regulations, accelerates automation testing, and integrates with Web, SAP, and .Net protocols. It is scalable and enhances productivity despite high costs limiting usage. Stability issues occur with multiple users, and support is limited to older .NET Framework and Visual Studio. Parallel execution needs improvement for simultaneous testing across browsers. Object repository functions speed up development, but object recognition, especially with calendar controls, requires customization.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText UFT Developer is praised for its extensive object repository functions, significantly speeding up automation testing development.

It offers flexibility by supporting a wide range of protocols, making it ideal for testing various applications like Web, SAP, Siebel, and .Net.

The tool is highly scalable and stable, maintaining scripts effectively for desktop, UI-based, and mobile applications.

Integrates seamlessly with Visual Studio and other products, enhancing productivity and efficiency in software testing automation.

OpenText UFT Developer's record technology and scripting capabilities make it intuitive and user-friendly for distributed teams.

CONS

OpenText UFT Developer is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support.

Parallel execution of tests across different browsers is limited and needs improvement.

OpenText UFT Developer is development intensive, requiring knowledge of various scripting languages, making it less accessible to those without a software engineering background.

Integration with other tools can be costly, and support for newer versions of .NET Framework and Visual Studio is limited.

Object definition and recognition need improvement, especially with calendar controls, and stability can vary based on infrastructure.

OpenText UFT Developer Pros review quotes

Research & Development Engineer at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Aug 19, 2019

It is a product that can meet regulations of the banking industry.

Read full review

RS

Performance Lead Manager at Wipro Limited

Jul 1, 2024

In UFT, it's a simple click to insert the checkpoints.

Read full review

reviewer1475940

Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

Mar 30, 2021

The solution is very scalable.

Read full review

OpenText UFT Developer

Free Report: OpenText UFT Developer Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText UFT Developer. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NA

Director, Information Technology Infrastructure at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Aug 25, 2019

One of the important features, which speeds up the automation testing development with LeanFT, is its object repository functions. Object identification are the most time-consuming aspect of building automation tests. LeanFT gives that out of the box. It helps you identify the objects and after that, once you got the object in place, then it's just about building the test scripts. So it reduces your development time significantly.

Read full review

PE

Peter-Paul Eijkenboom

Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG

Sep 15, 2019

The most valuable feature for me is the number of protocols that can be tested. It not only tests Web, but also SAP, Siebel, .Net, and even pdf.

Read full review

reviewer1270638

Programator at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Jan 22, 2020

The most valuable feature is the automation of test cases.

Read full review

Senior Test Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 13, 2019

The recording feature is quite good as it helps us to find out how things are working.

Read full review

reviewer1499238

Framework Architect and Test Automation Specialist at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jan 30, 2021

This tool is really good. We don't need to write any code, but it writes the code itself, only record and play. And it is simple, and it is not heavy; I mean, it doesn't have a large footprint, and it works well for us.

Read full review

DS

Dhananjay Singh

Team Leader at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 25, 2020

The cost is the most important factor in this tool.

Read full review

DG

Senior Specialist - Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees

Apr 13, 2021

The most valuable feature for UFT is the ability to test a desktop application.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 24)

OpenText UFT Developer Cons review quotes

Research & Development Engineer at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Aug 19, 2019

It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support.

Read full review

RS

Performance Lead Manager at Wipro Limited

Jul 1, 2024

There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad.

Read full review

reviewer1475940

Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

Mar 30, 2021

The pricing could be improved.

Read full review

OpenText UFT Developer

Free Report: OpenText UFT Developer Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about OpenText UFT Developer. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NA

Director, Information Technology Infrastructure at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Aug 25, 2019

The parallel execution of the tests needs improvement. When we are running tests in LeanFT, there are some limitations in terms of running the same tests simultaneously across different browsers. If I'm running a test, let's say to log in, I should be able to execute it through IE, through Microsoft Edge, through Chrome, through Mozilla, etc. This capability doesn't exist in LeanFT. Parallel execution of the test cases across different browsers need to be added.

Read full review

PE

Peter-Paul Eijkenboom

Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG

Sep 15, 2019

It's now too heavy and they should be making it faster. We do an attempt at automatic regression testing. We schedule a test to start at a certain time. It takes a lot of time to download the resources and start UFT. Competitors in this area have tools that start faster and run the test faster. For example, if the test at our side will take 10 minutes, another tool will do that in one minute.

Read full review

reviewer1270638

Programator at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Jan 22, 2020

The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement.

Read full review

Senior Test Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 13, 2019

The product has shown no development over the past 10 or 15 years.

Read full review

reviewer1499238

Framework Architect and Test Automation Specialist at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jan 30, 2021

With Smart Bear products generally, you can have only one instance of the tool running on a machine.

Read full review

DS

Dhananjay Singh

Team Leader at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Oct 25, 2020

In the next release, I would like to see the connectivity improved to be less complex and more stable.

Read full review

DG

Senior Specialist - Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees

Apr 13, 2021

I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 24)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Functional Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT Developer

Selenium HQ vs OpenText UFT Developer

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText UFT Developer

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT Developer

ReadyAPI vs OpenText UFT Developer

Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText UFT Developer

Visual Studio Test Professional vs OpenText UFT Developer

OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText UFT Developer

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Functional Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT Developer

Selenium HQ vs OpenText UFT Developer

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText UFT Developer

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT Developer

ReadyAPI vs OpenText UFT Developer

Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText UFT Developer

Visual Studio Test Professional vs OpenText UFT Developer

OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText UFT Developer

See all alternatives

Related questions

24

Which product supports Cross Browser Testing: UFT Developer or UFT One?

77

Cross-Platform Automated Testing Tool

228

Anyone have a good example of a Test Automation Business Case?

3

When evaluating Functional Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

207

What is the best automation tool to test dynamic data?

14

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

26

Tosca Testsuite Version 10.0

321

What is the best tool for SAP testing?

318

Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?

1,136

What are some common causes for software failure?