Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Looker Studio based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, and IBM Cognos.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Looker Studio surpasses its competitors by offering advanced data visualization, customizable dashboards, and seamless integration capabilities, enabling users to derive actionable insights and foster data-driven decision-making efficiently.
Google Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Google, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Microsoft Power BI excels with its integration and visualization, ideal for those within Microsoft ecosystems. In comparison, Looker Studio simplifies deployment for Google users, offering convenience in setting up integrations. Microsoft focuses on enterprise solutions, whereas Looker streamlines Google-centric tasks with ease.
Microsoft Power BI often involves a lower initial setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users. Looker Studio may have higher setup costs but offers advanced customization features, making it suitable for companies willing to invest for tailored solutions.
Microsoft Power BI often involves a lower initial setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users. Looker Studio may have higher setup costs but offers advanced customization features, making it suitable for companies willing to invest for tailored solutions.
Tableau offers extensive data connectivity and customization, beneficial for complex visualizations. In comparison, Looker Studio provides seamless Google integration and is cost-effective. A tech buyer might favor Tableau for its features or Looker Studio for its affordability and integration.
IBM Cognos offers extensive analytic capabilities and strong enterprise features but requires technical expertise. In comparison, Looker Studio excels in Google integration and cost-effectiveness, appealing to smaller businesses needing an intuitive solution despite needing enhancements in visualization and data speed.
IBM Cognos has a higher setup cost, making it a significant investment, whereas Looker Studio offers a more affordable setup, appealing to cost-conscious users.
IBM Cognos has a higher setup cost, making it a significant investment, whereas Looker Studio offers a more affordable setup, appealing to cost-conscious users.
Oracle OBIEE excels with advanced BI capabilities and robust security, ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, Looker Studio offers easier Excel and Google Sheets integration, with simpler deployment and affordability, appealing to organizations seeking quick data visualization and cost-effective solutions.
Oracle OBIEE has a significant setup cost, whereas Looker Studio offers a more affordable setup option. These differences highlight substantial pricing contrasts between the two solutions.
Oracle OBIEE has a significant setup cost, whereas Looker Studio offers a more affordable setup option. These differences highlight substantial pricing contrasts between the two solutions.
QlikView provides analytical efficiency using Associative Query Logic, ideal for complex data manipulation. In comparison, Looker Studio facilitates seamless Google integration, perfect for quick reporting and sharing. A tech buyer might choose QlikView for power or Looker Studio for simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
Looker Studio offers dynamic visualization and cloud-based analytics appealing to modern organizations. In comparison, SQL Server Reporting Services excels with enterprise-level reporting and detailed data handling, attracting businesses using robust SQL databases and Microsoft's ecosystem through its comprehensive integration and support.
Looker Studio offers a lower setup cost, allowing for cost-effective entry, while Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services incurs higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced capabilities and scalability for larger enterprises.
Looker Studio offers a lower setup cost, allowing for cost-effective entry, while Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services incurs higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced capabilities and scalability for larger enterprises.
TIBCO Jaspersoft offers customizable reporting and embedded analytics with attractive pricing. In comparison, Looker Studio excels in robust data modeling and seamless integration. TIBCO appeals for cost efficiency and control, whereas Looker Studio is ideal for enhanced data-driven decision-making.
Zoho Analytics appeals with affordable pricing, extensive integrations, and effective collaboration tools. In comparison, Looker Studio's integration with Google products offers free access but may require additional resources for data management, appealing to those needing budget-friendly analytics with detailed data manipulation features.
Zoho Analytics requires a lower setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Looker Studio involves a higher setup fee, suggesting a more premium service.
Zoho Analytics requires a lower setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Looker Studio involves a higher setup fee, suggesting a more premium service.
RStudio Connect is a web-based platform that allows organizations to share and manage data science content easily. Its primary use case is to enable data scientists to publish and share their work with stakeholders, including executives, analysts, and other team members. The solution helps organizations to streamline their data science workflows, reduce the time and effort required to share insights and improve collaboration across teams. With RStudio Connect, organizations can ensure that their data science content is secure, up-to-date, and accessible to the right people at the right time.
Plotly Dash Enterprise offers customizable dashboards with Python integration for specific business needs. In comparison, Looker Studio provides powerful data exploration tools and integration with Google services. Tech buyers might choose Plotly for cost-effectiveness or Looker for advanced analytics capabilities.
Plotly Dash Enterprise requires a higher setup cost compared to Looker Studio. Meanwhile, Looker Studio offers a more accessible setup option, making it cost-effective for teams with budget constraints.
Plotly Dash Enterprise requires a higher setup cost compared to Looker Studio. Meanwhile, Looker Studio offers a more accessible setup option, making it cost-effective for teams with budget constraints.
