Looker Studio vs QlikView comparison

Google and Qlik are both solutions in the Reporting category. Google is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.6, while Qlik is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Google holds a 2.7% mindshare in RT, compared to Qlik’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Looker Studio

Read 12 Looker Studio reviews

1,051 Views
1,158 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

QlikView

Read 161 QlikView reviews

1,651 Views
1,454 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Looker Studio

QlikView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

QlikView and Looker Studio are leading competitors in the business intelligence market. Based on features, QlikView excels in high-performance data processing, while Looker Studio stands out for its cost-effectiveness and seamless integration with Google services.

Features: QlikView provides advanced data management with patented AQL technology, rapid in-memory data processing, and a highly interactive user interface. Looker Studio offers integration with Google apps, ease of sharing data, and excellent collaboration features, making it a preferred choice for Google ecosystem users.

Room for Improvement: QlikView faces challenges such as expensive licenses, the need for technical expertise, and a somewhat dated user interface. Looker Studio users desire faster real-time data updates and improved report loading speeds.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView's on-premises nature allows for customization but requires significant setup efforts and reliance on partner networks for support. Looker Studio is cloud-based, simplifying deployment and providing streamlined support directly from Google.

Pricing and ROI: QlikView is priced at a premium, reflecting its robust features but involves significant licensing costs. Users report strong ROI from advanced analytics capabilities. Looker Studio is free, appealing for budget-conscious users, though costs may arise from supporting infrastructure and large data handling.

To learn more, read our detailed Looker Studio vs. QlikView Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Looker Studio vs. QlikView

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Looker Studio

Ranking in Reporting

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QlikView

Ranking in Reporting

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

161

Ranking in other categories

Embedded BI (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Reporting category, the mindshare of Looker Studio is 2.7%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QlikView is 3.4%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Reporting

Featured Reviews

Srini-Dhanaraj

Founder & CEO at imfine.club

Available for free and can help businesses resolve their data migration problems

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. Google Data Studio is a cloud-based tool. With cloud-based tools, there can be two challenges, the first one being associated with the bandwidth of your data strength. If I run a report from my home because of the wi-fi connection, it may give an excellent response. When I run the reports, Google Data Studio develops reports from my home, and because of wi-fi, it works in an excellent manner. When I am on the road or at the wheel, if I use the internet data from my mobile to browse my reports, the performance may not be good, and this issue is not because of the product but because of the bandwidth. The second issue arises when you connect Google Data Studio to a source system to extract the data to do the visualization. If the source system is not responding as quickly as expected, it could be the reason why the report may be printed slowly. Considering the aforementioned aspects, the problem may not be because of Google Data Studio but because of the source system.

Read full review

Arjun Meda

Assistant Vice President at HSBC India

Useful for data visualization and business intelligence

Many of the features in Qlik Sense need to be available and reintroduced in QlikView. I believe many of the features have been added to QlikView after the layout containers were introduced. QlikView used to be a way more customizable tool than Qlik Sense is in the present time. Improvements are required in the hide and unhide functionality that falls under the layout container feature that has been used in my company in recent times. Hiding off the apps in the app overview tab based on the access was a really good feature that needs to be introduced back in the product since I see that, at the moment, there are multiple groups on the tool, owing to which multiple changes on the QMC part is required to handle the solution. Only the person with access to the dashboard in QlikView could have a link to the dashboard through QlikView's hub or access points. With Qlik Sense, one can see whatever is available in the stream. If a user wants to control everything in the product, then there is no need to make multiple changes in the QMC at the individual app level. The aforementioned area can be considered to improve Qlik Sense.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The company dashboard is useful because we could share it via a link as a reminder for everyone to check it weekly. We observed the progress of our portfolio from last week to the current week, allowing us to compare revenues."

"Looker's ability to perform aggregation before visualization allows for effective data slicing and dicing."

"I am impressed with the tool's scheduling mechanism, refresh mechanism, and different types of charts."

"Valuable features include advanced integrated analysis and easy implementation."

"The product's initial setup phase is very simple."

"The integration with Excel and Google Sheets is a valuable feature, making it easy to access and visualize data."

"I find it favorable regarding speed of development, ease of building, and flexibility."

"This has improved our organization by allowing people to see their data and develop visualizations themselves."

More Looker Studio pros

"We use QlikView for its cost-effectiveness and ease of integration with databases."

"A well designed app brings freedom of inquiry to meetings, allowing me to answer questions in real time and this has transformed progress and outputs of our monthly group meeting."

"It's incredibly fast and can handle large volumes of data without slowing down our operations."

"Easy to analyze data by click-through."

"It has user-friendly data visualization features, supporting our decision-making process with its business intelligence capabilities"

"One of the good thing is that you can integrate different data source technologies. So you can model your environment without having any of our views running."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its associative data model. It allows me to discover hidden data and gain insights that are not immediately visible."

"Associative model - no more cubes."

More QlikView pros

Cons

"Other tools might be worth considering if you need more advanced features or support for a larger user base."

"When you physically install a product on one machine instead of the cloud, you have a better visibility, best icon quality, etc.. It's more of an issue with how we are adapting to the transition. We are still in the early moments of using this tool, and we need to go deeper to discover some improvements."

"The tool should improve on live data integration for quicker data reflection."

"There are issues with integration and I encountered limits and warnings, especially with my pivot table size."

"The challenges with Google Data Studio are associated with the security part, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Stability and scalability an be improved for a full ten."

"The tool has a lot of room for improvement. It's not very professional and allows for only simple tasks like indicating KPIs or quick calculations. It lacks a good calculation-based language like Power BI's DAX, making it less suitable for professional use. Additionally, the variety of visualization tools is limited, and customization options are restricted."

"The tool should come up with data modeling layer features that are present in other products like Power BI."

More Looker Studio cons

"The user interface and ease of use takes a bit of a learning curve to pick up."

"They should offer the capability to directly access data from SaaS environments, as it would simplify the migration process, and while it may seem like a minor enhancement, it would be beneficial to our clients."

"The only thing I would improve about it is the fact that it refreshes all the time, and when it does that, it just deletes all the options you had, all the filters that you had selected, so you need to select them from the beginning."

"Syntax editor needs some work, it's frustrating to have valid syntax being flagged as incorrect."

"They could improve the speed."

"There is a lack of static PDF report generation and automatic resizing of the dashboard to fit the device."

"There is a challenge on the frontend when it comes to browsing data through QlikView, as it isn't entirely compatible with other platforms we use."

"Installation and deployment could be made easier and quicker."

More QlikView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is available for free."

"The tool is free."

"I think the tool is cheap because you don't need to pay anything for using the tool. However, when connecting and analyzing other data sources, you should consider where to analyze this information because Google Data Studio doesn't handle much data well. You must also consider how you will connect this data to it. In this case, you might need to hire DevOps or a data team to help with these issues."

"The solution is free but the Google Looker is expensive."

"The cost is quite affordable based on feature analysis."

"QlikView is a reasonably priced solution."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one being low price and ten being high price, I rate pricing a four."

"My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly."

"I rate QlikView's pricing a five out of ten."

"The pricing is moderate, in the medium price range."

"It's reasonably priced and falls on the more affordable side."

"QlikView is more expensive than one of its competitors."

"The setup costs for QlikView are fair as are the yearly maintenance fees. The licensing becomes a bit more expensive and requires some planning for onboarding."

More QlikView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user79932

Senior Manager - BI Head at NVidia

Feb 4, 2015

Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho

1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Data Studio?

The company dashboard is useful because we could share it via a link as a reminder for everyone to check it weekly. We observed the progress of our portfolio from last week to the current week, all...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Data Studio?

The tool should improve on live data integration for quicker data reflection. Currently, changes in Google Sheets take about three to five minutes to reflect in Looker Studio. Overall, the interfac...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Data Studio?

I use Looker Studio primarily for dashboard creation and data analytics. I have integrated it with Google Sheets, and I use it for project plan maintenance and data tracking.

See all answers

What do you like most about QlikView?

If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?

Qlik Sense's licensing metrics are flexible. They provide packages based on needs, like named licenses, developer licenses, or shared pool licenses. There is also a core-based license option for or...

See all answers

What needs improvement with QlikView?

QlikView lacks self-service capabilities, which means users depend on the IT team to make changes. Qlik Sense offers a more modern approach with self-service features, allowing users to build dashb...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon QuickSight vs Looker Studio

Compared 43% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Looker Studio

Compared 19% of the time

Tableau vs Looker Studio

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Cognos vs Looker Studio

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Looker Studio

Compared 4% of the time

More Looker Studio Competitors

Tableau vs QlikView

Compared 23% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Cognos vs QlikView

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Analytics Cloud vs QlikView

Compared 5% of the time

More QlikView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Looker Studio

April 2025

Download Looker Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

QlikView

April 2025

Download QlikView product report

Also Known As

Data Studio

No data available

Overview

Google Looker Studio is a free tool designed to help users create visually appealing reports and dashboards, making data easier to understand. It allows you to connect to various data sources such as Google Analytics, Facebook Ads, and spreadsheets. With Looker Studio, you can create charts and graphs to showcase trends and comparisons, build comprehensive dashboards that provide an overview of your data, and customize reports to match your brand or preferences. Additionally, you can share your reports online or export them as PDFs for wider distribution.

Google

QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Genesys, Shueisha

Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.

Buyer's Guide

Looker Studio vs. QlikView

April 2025

Free Report: Looker Studio vs. QlikView

Find out what your peers are saying about Looker Studio vs. QlikView and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Looker Studio vs. QlikView report.

See our list of best Reporting vendors.

We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.