Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM DOORS Next pros and cons

Vendor: IBM

3.8 out of 5

16 reviews
93% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

IBM DOORS Next is valued for its link creation, requirement versioning, and reusability, supporting scalable user operations. Baseline functionalities and responsive technical support enhance user experience. However, users find migration arduous and recommend a DXL programmer. Caution with server loads is advised due to artifact limits, and concerns about text input, data storage, and reporting persist. Integration for Agile processes is lacking, and high costs are noted.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Link by Attribute feature is useful for creating links without needing the web interface manually.

Valuable features include versioning and reusing requirements.

IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is easier to scale to hundreds of users without problems.

Offers tailoring of modules to specific needs.

Valuable feature is displaying requirements in a tabular format with a traceability matrix for better viewing.

CONS

Users are advised against migrating from DOORS to DNG, suggesting instead that resources be spent on a DXL programmer to enhance DOORS.

There are limitations on the number of artifacts a server can handle and caution is advised regarding server load.

The data storage and reporting need improvement.

There is a need for dynamic linking to other MBSE toolsets or industry-leading tools.

IBM DOORS Next lacks Agile integration, making it unsuitable for those working in an Agile process.

IBM DOORS Next Pros review quotes

Requirements Engineer at Visteon Corporation

Feb 14, 2018

The "Link by Attribute" feature is useful for making links without needing to use the web interface manually.

Read full review

AK

CIO at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees

Aug 20, 2019

The most valuable features are the versioning of requirements and the possibility to reuse them.

Read full review

CEO at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Dec 4, 2019

It's web-based, so you don't have anything to install.

Read full review

Free Report: IBM DOORS Next Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about IBM DOORS Next. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HL

Software Engineering Consultant at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 18, 2020

The most valuable features are the baselines and links.

Read full review

HZ

Technical Sales Specialist at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jan 4, 2022

IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is easier to expand to build a backend with several servers, so you can also use it to scale up to several hundreds of users without major problems.

Read full review

Roger Trackwell

System Engineering Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees

Aug 18, 2022

One of the most valuable features is how you can tailor the modules.

Read full review

Senior Manager – Development, PD, Data Virtulization at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Aug 29, 2022

There are many good features with DOORS. The solution has a concept of streams and baselines, as well as a concept of components. A component is a subproject inside a project.

Read full review

reviewer2041065

Project System Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

Dec 13, 2022

As far as maintaining our requirements so that we can have copies of them, it's good. I can print it out if necessary.

Read full review

DB

Senior Technical Product Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Dec 26, 2023

My company contacts the solution's technical support, and they are good and responsive.

Read full review

Rahul Kumar Jangir

System Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Apr 12, 2024

The tool's most valuable feature is displaying requirements in a tabular format. This means you can see everything laid out in columns and rows. It is more aesthetic compared to other tools. The traceability matrix helps to view things better. It comes with different linking rules.

Read full review

Show 3 more reviews (out of 13)

IBM DOORS Next Cons review quotes

Requirements Engineer at Visteon Corporation

Feb 14, 2018

I have come to the conclusion that if you are considering migrating from DOORS to DNG, don't! Instead of spending 100's to 1000's of hours doing migrations, invest those hours in a DXL programmer to make DOORS do what it isn't doing for you now.

Read full review

AK

CIO at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees

Aug 20, 2019

When you are not working on it every day it is not very intuitive.

Read full review

CEO at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Dec 4, 2019

When you are in Jira or Confluence, you have some freedom in how you type in text. That's also a weakness of Confluence, however, as it opens the doors to sloppy work. In DOS Next Generation, the text is very rigorous, but it might be difficult for people who don't have the discipline. Having a way to quickly enter requirements could help. It might already be in there, but I don't know. I don't have enough experience with the tool yet.

Read full review

Free Report: IBM DOORS Next Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about IBM DOORS Next. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HL

Software Engineering Consultant at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 18, 2020

It offers a bad user experience and the usability is poor.

Read full review

HZ

Technical Sales Specialist at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jan 4, 2022

Both the data storage and reporting for this solution need improvement.

Read full review

Roger Trackwell

System Engineering Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees

Aug 18, 2022

The only additional feature would be if it had dynamic linking to other MBSE tool sets or industry-leading tools.

Read full review

Senior Manager – Development, PD, Data Virtulization at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Aug 29, 2022

There is room for improvement in the APIs that they have exposed for integration.

Read full review

reviewer2041065

Project System Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

Dec 13, 2022

It does have a tendency to condense the requirements. It kind of puts them in a tree format. Sometimes those trees are a little difficult.

Read full review

DB

Senior Technical Product Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Dec 26, 2023

IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is not a very user-friendly product.

Read full review

Rahul Kumar Jangir

System Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Apr 12, 2024

IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation has room for improvement compared to other tools like Polaris and Jama Connect. These tools offer more flexibility and options for developers, which IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation lacks. For example, you can define your link rules in Jama Connect, but you can't do that in IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation.

Read full review

Show 3 more reviews (out of 13)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Application Requirements Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Jira vs IBM DOORS Next

IBM DOORS vs IBM DOORS Next

Jama Connect vs IBM DOORS Next

Polarion Requirements vs IBM DOORS Next

Helix ALM vs IBM DOORS Next

PTC Integrity Requirements Connector vs IBM DOORS Next

Visure Requirements ALM Platform vs IBM DOORS Next

3SL Cradle vs IBM DOORS Next

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Application Requirements Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Jira vs IBM DOORS Next

IBM DOORS vs IBM DOORS Next

Jama Connect vs IBM DOORS Next

Polarion Requirements vs IBM DOORS Next

Helix ALM vs IBM DOORS Next

PTC Integrity Requirements Connector vs IBM DOORS Next

Visure Requirements ALM Platform vs IBM DOORS Next

3SL Cradle vs IBM DOORS Next

See all alternatives

Related questions

11

How would you compare IBM Rational DOORS with other Application Requirements Management solutions for IT projects?

24

Which product would you choose: IBM Rational Doors vs. IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?

35

Serena Dimensions RM vs. IBM DOORS

5

When evaluating Application Requirements Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

11

How would you compare IBM Rational DOORS with other Application Requirements Management solutions for IT projects?

8

Why is Application Requirements Management important for companies?