Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Cloud Private Logo

IBM Cloud Private pros and cons

Vendor: IBM
3.4 out of 5

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the category report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

IBM Cloud Private offers excellent technical support.
The framework integrates well with API Connect and provides private cloud deployment in any location.
The platform consistently delivers high reliability.
Control of the ESXi is maintained.
Containerization is managed through OpenShift, based on Kubernetes and Docker, to handle microservices.

CONS

IBM Cloud Private lacks multi-cloud management capabilities.
Latency issues can cause lag time during connections.
Auto-scaling and managing pod scaling in a microservices architecture can be challenging with high traffic volumes.
Support and pricing require improvements.
The satellite services layer is behind compared to Azure or Microsoft, with room for enhancement, and the DevOps layer needs better integrations with external applications like Jenkins.
 

IBM Cloud Private Pros review quotes

Mustafa Kavcioglu - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead at Halkbank
Oct 20, 2021
Excellent technical support.
CristianIriazabal - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect of solutions at Gire S.A.
Sep 1, 2022
The product's framework is good, it integrates well with API Connect, and the private cloud allows for use in any location.
KK
Head of Product Development at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Oct 6, 2023
The most valuable attribute is the platform's ability to consistently deliver high reliability.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Red Hat, Broadcom and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer2302863 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Global IT Infrastructure Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Nov 1, 2023
We have control of the ESXi.
VM
Executive Manager - Strategy & Enterprise Architecture Office at Al Rajhi Bank
Feb 16, 2024
Our core banking process was monolithic. To address this, we transitioned to a microservices-based architecture. Leveraging Microsoft technologies, including Terminals version 23, we’ve revamped our banking operations. Not all services are microservices; some remain monolithic for simplicity. Containerization is pivotal, with OpenShift (based on Kubernetes and Docker) managing our microservices.
 

IBM Cloud Private Cons review quotes

Mustafa Kavcioglu - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead at Halkbank
Oct 20, 2021
lacking in multi-cloud management.
CristianIriazabal - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect of solutions at Gire S.A.
Sep 1, 2022
One issue with the solution is latency because there is lag time when we connect.
KK
Head of Product Development at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Oct 6, 2023
Auto-scaling and managing pod scaling in the microservices architecture, a core feature of IBM Cloud Private, can pose challenges, especially when dealing with larger volumes of traffic.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Red Hat, Broadcom and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer2302863 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Global IT Infrastructure Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Nov 1, 2023
The support and pricing need to improve.
VM
Executive Manager - Strategy & Enterprise Architecture Office at Al Rajhi Bank
Feb 16, 2024
I've noticed that the satellite services layer requires some improvement compared to platforms like Azure or Microsoft. While it's in development, I believe the satellite layer has room for enhancement. Additionally, the DevOps layer could benefit from closer integrations, especially for using external applications like Jenkins.