Huawei OceanStor OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Huawei OceanStor is the #16 ranked solution in best All-Flash Storage Arrays. PeerSpot users give Huawei OceanStor an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. Huawei OceanStor is most commonly compared to Huawei OceanStor Dorado: Huawei OceanStor vs Huawei OceanStor Dorado. Huawei OceanStor is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 61% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a comms service provider, accounting for 25% of all views.
Buyer's Guide

Download the All-Flash Storage Arrays Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: November 2022

What is Huawei OceanStor?

OceanStor Dorado V3 is the industry's first all-flash storage that puts NVMe into commercial use. It is specially designed for enterprises' mission-critical businesses, meeting the most-demanding performance and reliability requirements of databases, VDI, server virtualization, and SAP HANA.

Huawei OceanStor was previously known as OceanStor Dorado V3 All-Flash Storage System, OceanStor 18000 V3 Series Storage Systems, OceanStor 6800 V3 Storage System.

Huawei OceanStor Customers

Piraeus, Clinique Univeritaires Saint-Luc

Huawei OceanStor Video

Archived Huawei OceanStor Reviews (more than two years old)

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Technology Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Good flexibility, straightforward to set up, and it is stable
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the flexibility in the rail, as it is hybrid storage."
  • "The administration should be simplified because there are a large number of options that make it too complicated, and the customers can get confused."

What is our primary use case?

We are a system integration company and we are working with Huawei OceanStor products. It is mainly used for virtualization.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the flexibility in the rail, as it is hybrid storage. It can be used for many different use cases, depending on what our customer requests.

What needs improvement?

The administration should be simplified because there are a large number of options that make it too complicated, and the customers can get confused. The V6 has already been improved and is much simpler, but the V3 is not.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Huawei OceanStor for a couple of months.

Buyer's Guide
All-Flash Storage Arrays
November 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Huawei, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: November 2022.
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have not seen any bugs or glitches.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is okay. It depends on whether you are asking the right questions. If you do then you get the right answers, but when the team is asking something that is not straight, then you won't solve the problem right away.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

In the past, I have had lots of experience with different storage vendors. I worked for many of them. I have found that most of them are using the same disks, so it is hard to point to things that differentiate them. For the most part, the functionality is the same but the functions have different names.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is okay and there is not much difficulty involved. The deployment can be completed in a couple of hours.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Technical Lead at Computer Marketing Company Pvt Ltd
Real User
Easy to install, good configuration and extremely stable

What is our primary use case?

We have some Huawei 9000 cases for our virtualization, and for the storage block-level and mass as well, For HyperMetro too, for 18560 and 6800, this solution is critical for our company. The product is the main one on the line, it serves the entire company. Our usage expands daily.  We are partners with Huawei and I'm the technical lead. 

What is most valuable?

The solution is easy to install and configure. It's also very stable. 

What needs improvement?

I'd like to see a more stable, lighter Metro and better logging system for issues and resolution in the future. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using this solution for the past 12 months. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

For HyperMetro there are some requirements for stable and dark fiber links. We have some issues with the dark fiber, but mostly their storage is very stable. We have around 3,500 users for 6800 and a total of almost 6,000 users. We used Huawei for the initial deployment but for the second deployment we mostly did it by ourselves.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer support is very good but if you want support and you don't have SNS switches as well, the complete solution is not there. Sometimes Huawei support doesn't extend to that. For other products they generally ask you to contact other principals. I don't think Huawei isselling their SNS switches anymore.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We didn't abandon the solutions we were using before Huawi. We have some EMC solutions which are also installed and running. 

How was the initial setup?

It's very easy to install and configure the solution. It didn't take too long, it was more about fulfilling requirements for storage and deployment, so probably a month to six weeks. 

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution and rate it a nine out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
All-Flash Storage Arrays
November 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Huawei, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: November 2022.
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IT Solution Architect at Huatech a.s.
Real User
Great for internal IT systems and excellent value for money
Pros and Cons
  • "Great value for money."
  • "Integration with mainstream solution technologies could be better."

What is our primary use case?

We are integrators so we're selling this solution to our customers. Many are from the transportation sector, public broadcasting sector, or they are service providers. They use it for internal IT systems. Our clients cover the full range from small to enterprise size companies. We are a gold partner with Huawei and I'm an IT solution architect. 

What is most valuable?

Most clients tell us that the most valuable feature of the solution is the value for money. They feel that they receive numerous great features for a reasonble price. IBM and HP charge a lot more for what OceanStor customers get as part of the product. 

What needs improvement?

There are some small things in the solution that can be improved. Supporting software is one of them and the integration with mainstream solution technologies could be better. They are small issues and generally the technology functions well. It's not an issue caused by the vendor but rather due to external circumstances and the cessation of cooperation between Chinese and US companies. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for about eight years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a very stable solution. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is an easy process. It has a good capacity. 

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is good, we're very satisfied with it. 

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup is very straightforward and easy. Deployment takes no more than 10 or 15 minutes. It takes three or four people from our company and the client company to carry out deployment. We carry out maintenance, it usually takes three people. 

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend everyone to try the product, they will be surprised at how good it is. 

I would rate this product a nine out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Manager Infrastructure and Security (SCADA) at a marketing services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Reliable data storage service that is easy to implement

What is our primary use case?

I'm the Manager of Infrastructure and Security at our company and we are a customer of Huawei. 

What is most valuable?

There are several valuable features. Huawei provides excellent and efficient support, and the product is a good price. It's very reasonable for the service they offer compared to their competitors.

What needs improvement?

The GUI is the only thing I would like to see improved, and the user interface is not so user friendly. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for six months. 

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup is very straightforward, very easy. We didn't have any challenges. 

What other advice do I have?

The product is still new for us so we haven't yet come across any technical issues yet. It's possible there will be some problems. 

I would rate this product an eight out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Project Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Good performance and has good stability

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for multiple network locations. We use XL servers and EIP software.

What is most valuable?

The performance of the solution is good.

What needs improvement?

Technical support could be improved on the solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is easy to scale as needed.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support has been a let down for us. It's something the company has to work on. We haven't been satisfied with their level of service.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup isn't complex. It's quite easy and straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

I handled the implementation myself.

What other advice do I have?

We use the on-premises deployment model.

I'd recommend the solution. We'd buy the solution again without any hesitation.

I'd rate it eight out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Chetan Woodun - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5
Good management and technical support, but it is not too cheap also.
Pros and Cons
  • "We get a quick response in case any component defaults. We have seen the benefits mostly."
  • "Huawei is not that cheap."

What is our primary use case?

Customers using in production environment

How has it helped my organization?

We deployed Huawei OceanStor because we had some problems increasing the number of users on our database and were suffering from slowness and downtime. Then we just thought the All-Flash represented a quick win. We implemented it and now most of our data-intensive transactions are sitting under All-Flash. 

We've gotten quite a good response from our users since we began using All-Flash.

What is most valuable?

The management is fine. And we get a quick response in case any component defaults. We have seen the benefits mostly.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using this solution for about one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

At first, we had some component failures - none that were critical because our system has built-in redundancy. We had a number of these failures at a component level, but that was quickly resolved through a firmware upgrade. We had some doubts we were going in the right direction by using the OceanStor solution, but all the problems got resolved through the firmware upgrade. I don't have much to say. Maybe our period of using it is too limited for me to say much about it.

How are customer service and technical support?

I've had experience with support. In fact, even for this type of solution, hyperconverged, we took the product support that is standard. In fact, the alerts go to us and they also go to Huawei support because it's a critical system for us. We sometimes have Huawei contacting us to say we got something even before we contact them. This is good. Support has been good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We've used NetApp, HP, and EMC.

How was the initial setup?

The physical installation itself is quite fast, but we had to go through the requirements with the connections and servers, etc. I would say it took about five or six weeks.

What was our ROI?

Not yet measured

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Since Huawei is a Chinese product we've got the tendency to think that it is very cheap. But Huawei is not that cheap. We compared Huawei's price before purchasing. We compared costs per GB to other suppliers, as well. We compared the cost to EMC and NetApp, which are quite nimble solutions. We had to also evaluate the local support that is in our country. We evaluated other criteria, as well. After these evaluations we chose Huawei. It was not only cost. Basically it's not the cheapest but it's in the mid-pricing. We've got the high end, the mid-price, then we've got the low end. Huawei would be in the middle.

I will keep it general and not provide a detailed analysis in terms of storage and the All-Flash requirements. In this case, people, especially application guys, should understand that All-Flash is not for all applications. This is important because of the cost of All-Flash compared to other storage solutions. In fact, you need to emphasize this very well and tell application guys that you're spending a lot of money on All-Flash when it's not really required. In my opinion, this is the main thing. Otherwise, you end up upgrading and upgrading and it's quite a budget for All-Flash compared to other storage.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated NetApp and EMC.

What other advice do I have?

On a scale from one to ten, I'd rate it at a seven. 

I gave it a score of seven based on my experience with other storage solutions. We've used NetApp, HP, and EMC. We've used quite a number. In fact, I gave this score because of the support. It is quite a high score. But frankly, we're still going through the steps of implementing. We have our main database there. Now we are going to optimize further. It's not only because All-Flash costs money. We should use it optimally. There is a tendency for users to put all their data on the All-Flash. We also have cache solutions whereby a part of the data is on the All-Flash. We are trying to convince users that they don't really need All-Flash for all their data, for all their applications. Maybe in more time, I can compare and give you an idea, but not yet at this stage. I can't tell you which features we need, not yet at this stage.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Consultant for user company
PeerSpot user
IT Manager at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Good availability, stability, and it is competitively priced
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the availability."
  • "The upgrading process needs improvement. Deploy it and notify the customers when new versions and stuff comes out. I don't think they're doing that well."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case of the 6400 and 6800 is as flash in our private cloud and the 5400's we use for backups in private cloud.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the availability. 

What needs improvement?

The upgrading process needs improvement. Deploy it and notify the customers when new versions and stuff comes out. I don't think they're doing that well.

In the next release, they should have encryption. Compliance is a very big thing in security. If we got encryption in the boxes, clients would be satisfied. We'd also like to see deduplication, compression, and NVMe capabilities. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's stable. What we're currently working on is very stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We've got about five or seven clients that are using it.

How are customer service and technical support?

We struggle a bit with technical support with the language barrier. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of the 55-5400 didn't take long because the guys knew already how to deploy. The 68's took long. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing is very fair. It's competitively priced. 

What other advice do I have?

I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

I would recommend it to someone considering it. Pricing is very competitive and the routing is very good. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
PeerSpot user
Chetan Woodun - PeerSpot reviewer
Chetan WoodunSenior Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Top 5Real User

(a)Makes sense to have the 6400 and 6800 is as flash in our private cloud and the slower 5400's as backup , but please make sure that you have an offsite copy as well, both for compliance and peace of mind!
(b)Also, when implementing those higher Tiers (Tier 1 : NVME), please make sure that the requirements are streamlined as the cost of NVMe can be 2.5 times those of SSD ( Tier 2) and the price even by Huawei standards is not on the lower side! Only the application requiring the fastest response time should normally be NVMe. Its important for users to understand the cost difference.
(c)About encryption, best done at application level.

Systems Technician at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
Has sped up our operations and it is easy to maintain and support
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution has improved our organization by speeding up our operations."
  • "The deployment took a little longer."

What is our primary use case?

We use it as primary storage for our Virtualization environment (vmware) under HP Blade system. We store the VM and the data on int (SQL Server, etc).

How has it helped my organization?

The solution has improved our organization by speeding up our operations and increasing the scale of operations (growth capacity).

What is most valuable?

I like the solution's speed and the use of SSD technology. If I have to compare it to what we had before, I would say that it's easier to maintain and to support (on top of performance). It offers great capacity.

it servers not only as SAN but also NAS. The conectivity has a lot of options and prepares us for the use of Ethernet 10Gbit.

The configuration (web interface) is very simple and the dashboard provides all the basic information (health, etc) in a glimpe.


For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using Huawei OceanStor ( /products/huawei-oceanstor-reviews ) for about nine months now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We haven't experienced any problems since we started using the solution a few months ago. I hope that this continues. Considering that this is a new technology and not a fast prototype, I don't think there will be any stability problems.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

According to their specifications, the scalability is very good. We didn't have to scale yet, but in the future we might add more disks.

How are customer service and technical support?

So far we never had to call support. We currently have a contract who is available 24 hours a day with four hours response time. But as we haven't used it before, I don't know if it's really good or not.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We had an Hitachi SAN AMS 2100 system, that provided us a great service along a lot of years, but that at the moment was completely obsolete (limited FC speed, disks starting to fail frequently, low relative capacity). The storage was not in par with the new servers and their capacities. The main cause of removal was the lack of official support. 

How was the initial setup?

The deployment took a little longer. The installation and setup were just like any other product. It was not complex at all. We want everything to run smooth, so deployment took us about a week or two. But it could be done in two days' time, it is just that we preferred to be more secure and going step by step. In our case, we were moving a lot of data from the old system to the new one and we did this one thing at a time. So that is why it took so long.

What about the implementation team?

We use a vendor team with great expertise in the solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pay attention to other systems with licensing. This system included everything in perpetual mode. Setup cost and time is very simple. As a new player price is very competitive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

There are many different companies and products out there and we did look at a few of them, like HP, Dell, PureStorage and IBM but in the end the best quality-price ratio made this product the winner.

What other advice do I have?

It would be very pretentious to give advice to anyone since the product is very simple and easy to use and we have it only for less than a year. I think the system has more features than we are using right now. Fortunately we have not the opportunity to check the quality of the service as till the moment we have not any problem. 
Perfection is difficult to achieve, so on a scale from one to ten, my rating is nine. F

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Chetan Woodun - PeerSpot reviewer
Chetan WoodunSenior Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Top 5Real User

Great to hear that you are using HP blade and Huawei Oceanstor and all being managed by VMWARE. We used it before and it works.
As for the storage, afterwards, have a look at the Dedup features , it will help you to save on disk space
Also, you may want to do a quarterly or monthly health-check to make sure that you are proactive unless your logs are shipped to Huawei support automatically. There are many features which enables maintenance of a predictive nature and Huawei has them.

Remigiusz Gorecki - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Center Presales Engineer at Integrated Solutions
MSP
Good synchronous and asynchronous features but it needs better management features
Pros and Cons
  • "The initial setup was straightforward."
  • "The management is not a good feature in all of Huawei products. It's not easy or simple. Huawei has some problems with management and handling storage information from one interface."

What is most valuable?

The replication, both the synchronous and asynchronous are the most valuable features. 

What needs improvement?

The management is not a good feature in all of Huawei products. It's not easy or simple. Huawei has some problems with management and handling storage information from one interface.

Technical support needs improvement. It would be helpful if there was more support in my country. I'm from Poland and there's no big Huawei support here. We are a country and we have only two technical people from Huawei. Sometimes it's not enough.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Sometimes, we have problems with the storage controller, but after adjusting it works fine. Generally, it's a very good solution.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support could be a problem. We have no big problem with the storage, but we do have problems sometimes. I have Huawei service with my license. In our country, there is no support center and generally, the support center is in China. Sometimes there are language barriers.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. The time it takes to deploy depends on the configuration. It can take a few hours if you are including mounting the storage and bigger deployments with the many controllers can take longer. It can take up to three days, depending on architectural complexities.

What about the implementation team?

I'm an integrator, so I only sell it and deploy the solution in the customer environment.

What other advice do I have?

The customer should know what he wants and the person who manages the storage should outline the needs. You should be aware of what the seller wants to sell and what he wants to do. But this is relevant to every storage product. As a seller, it's very important to not promise the customer better than what the solution delivers. OceanStor is the best Huawei product for the data center.

I would rate this solution seven out of 10. I've never had a storage solution that I've wanted to give more than an eight to. There is no solution without disadvantages.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
PeerSpot user
Chetan Woodun - PeerSpot reviewer
Chetan WoodunSenior Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Top 5Real User

(a) To avoid language barrier, best is to have email exchanges preceding oral communications/ conf calls. Please make sure that you fill in the fault docket ( TAC Excel form) providing all necessary info
(b) As for problems with the storage controller, you can do regular health checks and make sure that they provide you the root cause of the problem. By they, I mean GTAC- ( Head Quarters) as I understand that the local guys are busy
(c) About the management, I agree with you if you have worked with HP, IBM, DELL like myself , it seems very basic, but it does the job! However, in case of any functionality problem, you can have the a version upgrade.
Hope this helps.

PeerSpot user
IT Support Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
The possibility to split disks into domains also provide a way to get the best "money saving" over "performance" ratio using tiering of disks, so you can use the right tier for any application
Pros and Cons
  • "If your virtual machine that resides on it completely fills the storage space, thanks to it's built-in function of all-zero data space reclamation, you just have to ask to System Engineer to run a zero-free on hosts (thin provisioned) and you will get more space instantaneously."
  • "Unfortunately, this product doesn't support Flash Disks, but it's IOPS capacity is a great compromise."

How has it helped my organization?

Once we had to implement a completely new environment and we didn't need to buy another storage because of it's flexibility.

If your virtual machine that resides on it completely fills the storage space, thanks to it's built-in function of all-zero data space reclamation, you just have to ask to System Engineer to run a zero-free on hosts (thin provisioned) and you will get more space instantaneously.

What is most valuable?

The horizontal scalability up to eight members and the possibility to distribute disks in domains made it my choice, it's perfect for any purposes because there is no waste of space.

The possibility to split disks into domains also provides a way to get the best "money saving" over "performance" ratio using tiering of disks, so you can use the right tier for any application you want to run on.

For example: for a server that only need to stream videos (sequential reading) you will create a mixed tier using SSD for caching and HDD for backend storage.

What needs improvement?

Unfortunately, this product doesn't support Flash Disks, but it's IOPS capacity is a great compromise.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The kernel stability makes it the best choice for preventing disasters, every member in cluster also had at least two active intelligences for redundancy, but in my experience, I never encountered any kind of problem. I think this hardware can last 50 years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Absolutely not, as explained previously, with it's up to eight members for cluster, you can also start a new cluster if you need to expand the business over and over.

How are customer service and technical support?

Unfortunately (or not), I've never had to interface with it, not even for an initial setup. It's really easy to implement in any existing environment.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

The company for which I set up the system was born with this core solution.

How was the initial setup?

Absolutely not, the product work out-of-the-box, you just need a knowledge about networking (in case of ISCSI) and FC protocol (in case of FiberChannel LUN provisioning that was my case).

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This product value matches its price.

What other advice do I have?

It's the best co-worker you could have with you! And he never gets holidays.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user711933 - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
The product is designed to have always HA (High Availability) with redundant network and processors.
Pros and Cons
  • "Stability: The product is designed to have always HA (High Availability) with redundant network and processors."
  • "Configuration complexity and the tools available."

How has it helped my organization?

  • High storage capacity integrated with the core business.
  • Possibility to create new virtualized IT services connected to this storage.
  • Possibility to share very high quantity of information between high quantity of users.

What is most valuable?

Stability: The product is designed to have always HA (High Availability) with redundant network and processors.

Scalability: Willing to integrate high quantity of volumes from different protocols for storage/HD (SAS, SCSI, etc.).

Compatibility: Fully compatible with network based storage both TCP/IP for NAS and FC (Fiber Channel) for SAS.

What needs improvement?

Configuration complexity and the tools available.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No. Very stable, once it has been properly configured.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No. Very scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

Could improve. There is a lot of documentation, fairly complete, but the technical assistant in my experience could improve.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No. Just using before an open-source-based solution and not scalable.

How was the initial setup?

The configuration process is very complex, and the proprietary tools/software available for configuration are kind of tricky to install and run.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It's roughly affordable.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes. HP and EMC. Those are considerably more expensive than OceanStor.

What other advice do I have?

Check for the new version (V3). It seems to have some interesting features and improvements on the configuration process.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free All-Flash Storage Arrays Report and find out what your peers are saying about Huawei, Dell Technologies, NetApp, and more!
Updated: November 2022
Product Categories
All-Flash Storage Arrays
Buyer's Guide
Download our free All-Flash Storage Arrays Report and find out what your peers are saying about Huawei, Dell Technologies, NetApp, and more!