We performed a comparison between Unitrends and Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."It is fairly stable."
"It's not easy to scale it."
"Being an appliance-based solution, we were able to migrate backup solutions without having to purchase a lot of hardware separately."
"When we talk about a backup point of view, from a backup perspective, it's a good one."
"Backup/archive to multiple locations."
"Replication to Forever Cloud."
"I really like the reporting options you get for various email reports."
"What I found most valuable in Unitrends is its simple user interface. It also works reliably."
"This is a reliable system that supports Veeam backup and recovery for Windows."
"The user interface is good. It provides a lot of information."
"It is a stable solution."
"The Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is easy to use and performing a recovery is easy to do."
"A full-featured option for managing virtual machines with an instant recovery feature."
"It's powerful and user-friendly."
"The product is free to use. We don't have to pay for a license."
"If you have windows machine at home and you'd like a backup, you can always download their free edition and plug in an external hard disk, and do a full backup of your laptop."
"Unitrends can be challenging to scale."
"The solution’s UI can be improved. I am saying this because I have seen solutions with better UIs."
"I would like to see more storage options for the free version."
"No appliance update notifications."
"Making the seeding process more accessible and easier to understand. Also, make more of the undocumented best practices easier to find."
"There are some questions as to how safely they are storing backup data."
"In terms of improvement, the UI, especially in the recovery section, is unclear about which repository it uses."
"It would be great to have the job throttle/limit the max number of backups on a single ESXi host."
"I would like to have more flexibility in terms of reporting details about the backup."
"Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows should improve by having more features, easier deployment, and compatibility with Unix boxes."
"Troubleshooting is very hard."
"They should improve the solution's automation features."
"If they could let you can do replication to physical servers - a backup from physical servers and a replication to physical servers - that will be better."
"While the Veeam agent is perfect, sometimes the agent doesn't install in Windows."
"I would like to see the capability for remote installation of third party applications added( Like installing WinRar MS Office etc..) , and Firewall for servers."
"I would like to see the ability for incremental backups and reverse backups."
More Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Unitrends is ranked 42nd in Backup and Recovery with 34 reviews while Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery with 40 reviews. Unitrends is rated 7.8, while Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Unitrends writes "The solution can be used to back up servers and Hyper-V cluster nodes, but its support is super expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] writes "Functional application availability". Unitrends is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Acronis Cyber Protect, Commvault Cloud and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), whereas Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, AOMEI Cyber Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and AWS Backup.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.