We performed a comparison between Toad Data Modeler and Toad for Oracle based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I found all features valuable and necessary in Toad Data Modeler, particularly how good the solution is for modeling, database schema generation, and database re-engineering. I also found Toad Data Modeler straightforward to use."
"It is not feasible for small businesses. It is not used in a small company."
"Auto-complete is the best feature of the solution."
"The schema browser is the most valuable feature. The way it presents the objects in our database."
"The most valuable feature is the navigation within the UI, where you can right-click on an object in an SQL query and go right to it, versus going through all of the menus to find what you are looking for."
"The tool evaluates non-optimized queries and generates the queries in a way that is more optimal - in addition to giving us some good practices for code development."
"Simply the best GUI software for administration is the most valuable aspect for me."
"The best product for working with Oracle databases for support, checking and loading data."
"I find Toad easy to use and I love the Workspace feature, which allows me to set up projects so that I can open SQL files applicable to what I am working on at any particular time."
"It is very easy to manage all of the objects."
"The product's most valuable features are UI and monitoring."
"What could be improved in Toad Data Modeler is stability and the complex setup."
"It is not feasible for small businesses. It is not used in a small company."
"The product should provide better debugging features."
"Many users don't know how to add licensing to Toad, or where it is shown, so they could make that easier."
"I would like to see an improvement in the performance because opening the browser and the editor should be faster."
"The way the dialog boxes appear can be improved."
"Toad for Oracle does not have a particular resolution within the application."
"Query optimization is still very resource-intensive."
"Improvement wise, for the user it should show the minimum features on the screen and not all the features. Toad has a lot of features, but most users will use only 5 or 10 based on their role. Nobody needs all the features, and they should provide the option to choose only the required features. Only minimum requirements should be enabled by default. When all the features are shown, the performance is not good; it loads slowly and has hundreds of popups and unnecessary questions."
"It would be better if they had an online option allowing me to connect from anywhere on any device. Sometimes I face some errors, depending on the network and setup. It's not a big issue."
"I'd like reporting to be more available. If it was a feature that was already installed, more people would take advantage of it."
"There may be an issue with processing limitations but this cannot be confirmed as a problem with the product or with the newest releases."
Toad Data Modeler is ranked 9th in Database Development and Management with 18 reviews while Toad for Oracle is ranked 3rd in Database Development and Management with 15 reviews. Toad Data Modeler is rated 8.4, while Toad for Oracle is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Toad Data Modeler writes "Along with an initial setup that is straightforward, the solution offers excellent support to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Toad for Oracle writes "Advanced query optimization and tuning features ". Toad Data Modeler is most compared with Oracle SQL Developer, IDERA ER/Studio, Aqua Data Studio and Redgate SQL Toolbelt, whereas Toad for Oracle is most compared with Toad Edge, Oracle Enterprise Manager, Aqua Data Studio, DbVisualizer and SolarWinds Database Performance Analyzer. See our Toad Data Modeler vs. Toad for Oracle report.
See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
