Tanium vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

Tanium and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Tanium is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.6, while WatchGuard is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8. Tanium holds a 2.2% mindshare in EPP, compared to WatchGuard’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 78% of Tanium users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

Tanium

Read 20 Tanium reviews

10,658 Views
4,690 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

WatchGuard EPDR

Read 37 WatchGuard EPDR reviews

4,897 Views
3,722 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Tanium

WatchGuard EPDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 16, 2025

Tanium and WatchGuard EPDR are competing products in endpoint protection. Tanium has the upper hand in enterprise features, while WatchGuard EPDR excels in ease of deployment and customer service.

Features: Tanium provides robust asset discovery, threat detection, and patch management. It offers comprehensive endpoint protection suitable for large enterprises in need of detailed insights. WatchGuard EPDR combines traditional antivirus with endpoint detection and response capabilities, emphasizing automated threat hunting and zero-trust application services.

Room for Improvement: Tanium could enhance its ease of deployment and reduce the complexity of its installation process. Users have indicated that Tanium requires significant IT involvement for setup and management. There's also room for improving Tanium's ongoing resource requirements. WatchGuard EPDR can improve its enterprise feature set to better compete with larger solutions. Some users desire more customization in reporting capabilities and a reduction in initial costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WatchGuard EPDR offers simple deployment with a cloud-based management system, reducing setup time and integration challenges. Its customer service is responsive, addressing queries quickly. On the other hand, Tanium demands a complex installation process, requiring more involvement from IT professionals.

Pricing and ROI: WatchGuard EPDR’s initial pricing is higher but is justified with rapid deployment and lower overall cost of ownership due to automation, which leads to significant ROI over time. Tanium's higher upfront costs and need for ongoing management may result in slower ROI. However, its comprehensive protection is appreciated by organizations with complex security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Tanium vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Tanium vs. WatchGuard EPDR

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Tanium

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

21st

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (3rd), Vulnerability Management (20th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th)

WatchGuard EPDR

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

10th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Tanium is 2.2%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WatchGuard EPDR	2.1%
Tanium	2.2%
Other	95.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Vignesh K

Infra Vulnarability Manager at Rezilyens

Immediate results in patching promptly address vulnerabilities

When working with Tanium, there are some older devices that haven't been patched for a long time, and certain patches are not included in Tanium. I have to search outside to download patches, create bundles, and then perform the task. It would be easier if Tanium provided the patches directly. Some other brands provide the patch with a direct download link, which facilitates the process. Also, I feel that if there were more detailed documents and remediations readily available online for troubleshooting, especially more up-to-date information, it would be beneficial. Currently, some resources online are very out-of-date.

Read full review

Norlia Jalani

Section Head, Information Technology at a transportation company with 201-500 employees

Using cloud-based console for software inventory management and email alerts

I have no idea if I use some automation functions. I can't find any disadvantages; maybe that is because many companies haven't used it. I would prefer to see some features such as AI in antivirus solutions. I appreciate reporting, but it could be better with monthly reporting or auto-generated monthly reports.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When I push a quick update, it's done right away, and I can rescan immediately to confirm completion within minutes."

"The interrogation piece was the most valuable feature because it was very detailed."

"Threat hunting is a very good feature on Tanium. We have just started using it and have not used it extensively."

"The product is granular and can build complex roles compared to other EDR vendors."

"I would say Tanium is the best tool for vulnerability management."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the consolidation of all historical data on device endpoints, security drivers, firmware, and Software version gaps."

"For incident response tasks, all these tasks can get done in minutes with minimal disruption to the end-user."

"Tanium is a very good product and I would rate it eight or nine out of ten."

More Tanium pros

"It's very easy to deploy, we don't have any problem or issues. It's most full automatic. It basically takes the assumption that everything is supposed to be a suspect; files, processes, URL accesses, and so on."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its device control."

"The protection from malware is the most important feature. It has some endpoint information about the vehicle of the virus, malware, etc. It is also stable and easy to install, and they also provide good technical support."

"The reporting feature is valuable."

"Panda Security solution has a feature to block any unknown process and that is what is best about it."

"The patch management module is very important."

"The interface is great."

"It is easy to manage."

More WatchGuard EPDR pros

Cons

"We had some issues with the solution's OS upgrade."

"The most painful thing is the interface. It's a bit unclear sometimes."

"I would like to have more integrations and custom plugins to input. Integration is always a big deal in a lot of different environments."

"Tanium's limitations should be improved because although it is a great tool, it is limited to only a few classes during a session."

"The solution can give a lot of false positives."

"Most of the time, agent-relative issues have to be more equipped with self-healing features. At times, the agent is there, but for some reason, it doesn't report a status. It gives certain problems that are obviously agent-based."

"There are some bugs in the product. The tool needs to improve in the area of reporting."

"Tanium required local admin or root rights on Mac devices, which did not comply with our security policies. This made the solution less suitable for our restrictive environment."

More Tanium cons

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense’s stability could be improved."

"The Linux installation is performed on the command line and they need a package installer for that operating system."

"The gap between the two final conclusions is a problem, whether or not a file is known to be malware or is known to be safe."

"The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor, however, these issues are common with other vendors, not just WatchGuard."

"The product is available at a very high price, making it an area where improvements are required."

"WatchGuard EPDR does have areas for improvement. One significant gap is the lack of a virtual patching feature integrated into the endpoint security. This would be particularly useful for endpoints running operating systems that are no longer supported, such as Windows 7."

"For some urgent updates, I don't like the need for the tool to be frequently restarted."

"Needs a better way to scan the hardware to detect whether it's valid."

More WatchGuard EPDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive but it's a good investment."

"The product's pricing differs from region to region depending on negotiations and the number of endpoints."

"There is an annual license required to use this solution."

"Tanium is a more expensive solution in Latin America than some of the competitors, such as BigFix."

"The solution offers value for money."

"It's an expensive solution. It would be nice if the cost were lower."

"It is higher than some competitors in the market."

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."

"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."

"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."

"The product is available at a high price."

"The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions."

"The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."

"The price is excellent."

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

More WatchGuard EPDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Hospitality Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Tanium?

The product is granular and can build complex roles compared to other EDR vendors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tanium?

While there is always room for improvement, I am pleased with Tanium.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tanium?

The primary use case for Tanium ( /products/tanium-reviews ) is compliance, patching, and inventory as part of the core functions.

See all answers

What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?

The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?

The price of the solution is okay. It's all right.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?

I would not be able to say what areas of WatchGuard EPDR have improved, as I do not work with the product myself so much anymore. I just used to assist with installation and deployment, especially ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tanium

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Tanium

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Tanium

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs Tanium

Compared 5% of the time

BigFix vs Tanium

Compared 5% of the time

More Tanium Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 13% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 5% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 4% of the time

More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Tanium

December 2025

Download Tanium product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard EPDR

December 2025

Download WatchGuard EPDR product report

Also Known As

Tanium Inc Cloud, Tanium XEM

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Overview

Tanium offers robust endpoint protection, patching, and inventory management, consolidating the functions of tools like BigFix with capabilities in incident response, network security, and cloud or on-premise deployments.

Known for real-time capabilities, Tanium provides detailed analytics, security features, and device management. Users benefit from quick implementation, real-time updates, and patching campaigns. Despite its strengths, integration and custom plugin expansion remain areas to improve, along with data visualization and network optimization. Reporting enhancements and user training could advance its usability, and some UI elements may require updates for clarity and security.

What are the essential features of Tanium?

Detailed Analytics: Provides actionable insights for better decision-making.
Security Capabilities: Offers strong defense measures against threats.
Real-Time Queries: Facilitates immediate information access.
Patch Management: Streamlines software updates across devices.
Device Management: Efficiently handles comprehensive inventory and monitoring tasks.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex IT tasks.
Scalability: Adapts to growing IT infrastructure needs.
Integration Flexibility: Merges with existing systems effortlessly.
Real-Time Updates: Ensures current data availability for informed actions.

Tanium's deployment spans industries focusing on endpoint protection and compliance, ensuring reliable device and server management in settings where safety and quick adaptation are critical. Organizations use it for application deployment, compliance checks, and integrating it as an EDR solution, enhancing overall security and operational efficiencies.

Tanium

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

JPMorgan Chase, eBay, Amazon, US Bank, MetLife, pwc, Cerner, Delphi, MGM Grand, New York Life

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

Tanium vs. WatchGuard EPDR

December 2025

Free Report: Tanium vs. WatchGuard EPDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Tanium vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tanium vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.