

ThreatLocker and Tailscale compete in securing network architecture. Tailscale seems to have the upper hand with superior network connectivity solutions.
Features: ThreatLocker provides strict application whitelisting, comprehensive endpoint security protocols, and focuses on restricting endpoint risks. Tailscale emphasizes seamless VPN connectivity, ease of use, and efficient network creation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThreatLocker offers straightforward deployment and strong customer service. Tailscale simplifies onboarding with a user-friendly setup and seamless integration with existing systems.
Pricing and ROI: ThreatLocker involves substantial upfront costs with long-term ROI through robust security. Tailscale offers a flexible pricing model, with lower initial investment and cost-efficiency by reducing network complexity.
Previously, networks with FortiGate were used, and that forced us to spend on hardware. With Tailscale, that type of investment is not necessary.
We have seen clear return on investment since implementing Tailscale by eliminating VPN server infrastructure costs.
With Tailscale, I set it up and forget it because it just works, allowing me to avoid worrying about the whole VPN aspect of my home network architecture.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
Based on what we use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for with the same functionalities and packaging, it was around 13 or 14 hours.
We have the MDR package as well, and just knowing someone is watching those endpoints at 3:00 a.m. is a lifesaver that you cannot put a dollar figure on.
Tailscale is that reliable, and their documentation answers any questions I have.
The user interface, documentation, and support for Tailscale are fabulous.
I would give it a ten out of ten.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
I would say it is really scalable, and I do not think I have ever experienced any downtime with Tailscale.
As a free-tier user, I have tested my limits, connecting the maximum amount of devices, and everything performed great.
We have over 300 to 400 devices that use Tailscale that we connect with and utilize on a daily basis.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales very smoothly with our growing needs.
Tailscale is a SaaS platform, so Tailscale scales it themselves.
Tailscale is stable; it has never given me downtime on their side.
For what we use it for—interconnection and networks—it is very stable.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
Tailscale could be improved with more advanced network visibility and monitoring tools, cleaner pricing tiers for scaling teams, and enhanced built-in reporting for device posture and controls for enterprise environments.
At my apartment, I can do 2-gig networking, but when I connect via the exit node, and I'm wired in somewhere else, and that place also has 2-gig networking, I'm at max getting half of my speed.
I would like Tailscale to provide more censorship-resistant options, such as Shadowsocks or VLESS, as fallback protocols.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform could improve by being a little more hands-off, perhaps by having a team inside ThreatLocker that does all the vetting of patches; having one person hired by ThreatLocker to check out patches means that a million other industries using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform do not have to vet the same patch, ultimately saving time and money around the world.
This feedback would help us understand what is learned in real-time, especially during a one-hour learning mode setup, ensuring we remain aware of potentially unnecessary learned items.
Tailscale has definitely made it so I don't have to incur additional costs.
The setup has been straightforward and predictable with the per-user subscription model and no infrastructure or hardware setup cost, making the initial deployment inexpensive.
I never used a license. I never purchased or bought anything more than the basic free license.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
Money is saved because it is not costly, and I would suggest it for other companies.
The security is valuable, as there are many providers available, but Tailscale fulfills the requirements that we had, allowing us to access and expose internal apps without exposing them to the general internet.
The most valuable features are the Zero Trust architecture, peer-to-peer connectivity using WireGuard, easy deployment and setup, access control for granular permissions, single sign-on, subnet and routing, exit nodes, and cross-platform support.
Tailscale's security is fabulous, especially the access control features and the ability to use existing OAuth accounts for access.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Tailscale | 6.6% |
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform | 2.6% |
| Other | 90.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Tailscale offers secure, remote network access without complex VPN setups, using Zero Trust architecture and WireGuard. It suits enterprises and personal use by simplifying connections across platforms and improving workflows.
Tailscale enhances remote access by providing seamless integration across devices. It supports connectivity for subnet routers and exit nodes and integrates with GitHub Actions to streamline workflows. Its Zero Trust and WireGuard-based security architecture ensures safe, reliable access while reducing the complexity of traditional VPNs. Users appreciate the ability to manage resources, connect server clusters, and access internal systems with ease. Documentation is robust, aiding in the swift setup and management of network deployments.
What are Tailscale's standout features?In industries requiring secure, remote network access, Tailscale is employed to connect teams and maintain resource accessibility without compromising security. It's utilized in mesh networking, server management, and granting intranet-only access, enhancing collaboration by allowing safe internal connectivity while preventing external threats.
Gain proactive, industry leading Zero Trust cybersecurity capabilities with ThreatLocker. By employing a deny-by-default approach, you will greatly enhance your security and operational efficiency. Solutions from ThreatLocker are focused on precise application control and
streamlined access management without administrative rights.
ThreatLocker Application Control solutions include Zero Trust Alllowlisting, Zero Trust Ringfencing and Privilege Access Management, significantly reducing any unauthorized software activities in your environment. Granular controls improve your overall security, while ringfencing enhances application behavior monitoring. Elevation requests will allow users to gain administrative access without IT intervention. The platform's ease of policy management and real-time threat visibility contribute to reduced help desk tickets and operational costs, ensuring protection against ransomware and
unauthorized applications.
What are the key features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
Organizations often deploy ThreatLocker to ensure endpoint security in industries requiring stringent application control and administrative access management. Its functionalities are critical for managing Shadow IT, creating policies, and overseeing software installation approvals. Common usage spans sectors demanding robust security and compliance, such as finance and healthcare, where maintaining high
security and efficiency is crucial.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.