Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

T-Plan Robot vs Testuff comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

T-Plan Robot
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (56th)
Testuff
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (32nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. T-Plan Robot is designed for Test Automation Tools and holds a mindshare of 0.1%, up 0.0% compared to last year.
Testuff, on the other hand, focuses on Test Management Tools, holds 0.5% mindshare, up 0.3% since last year.
Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
T-Plan Robot0.1%
Tricentis Tosca19.2%
OpenText Functional Testing8.4%
Other72.3%
Test Automation Tools
Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Testuff0.5%
Tricentis qTest12.5%
OpenText Application Quality Management11.2%
Other75.8%
Test Management Tools
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: October 2025.
872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Abraxas Informatik AG, AGCO GmbH, Beyond Trust, Bluebox, Bridgewater, Canon, Capita, Criminal Records Bureau, Euronext - NYSE Group, Eurostar International Ltd, EurotaxGlass, Fujitsu-Siemens, Gemini Observatory, NYSE Euronext, NWIPT, OCLC, Olea Medical, Watertek, Xerox Corporation, Xtrakter Ltd, Yodel - HDNL, Yoodoo
Leica Microsystems, SRA International, TDR, Core Brands, Blackboard, Repete, Roblox
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: October 2025.
872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.