No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) vs Zero Networks comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Symantec Zero Trust Network...
Ranking in ZTNA
20th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Access Management (26th), ZTNA as a Service (21st)
Zero Networks
Ranking in ZTNA
17th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Microsegmentation Software (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the ZTNA category, the mindshare of Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is 2.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zero Networks is 1.7%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ZTNA Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Zero Networks1.7%
Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)2.5%
Other95.8%
ZTNA
 

Featured Reviews

cto543714 - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Restricts access to applications but improvement is needed in integrations
Over the last year, I have been working with customers because it's changing and maturing. These things are rolled out in segments and chunks, not all at once. Additional internal work is often required to make it functional, such as properly configuring the active directory. This internal work can take up to three months. The process varies, and implementing Symantec ZTNA quickly is not realistic. I wouldn't recommend the tool to non-core customers because you won't get the support you need. I'd rate Symantec ZTNA a seven on a scale of one to ten. They're still integrating different pieces into their solution. The challenge with ZTNA is that different companies implement it slightly differently, with some features present in one product but missing in another. ZTNA is a tricky acronym that companies use, but when you look closely, you find that each vendor might only have some of the expected features.
Use Zero Networks?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.
892,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Performing Arts
7%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?
Pricing varies depending on the situation. In competitive situations, it's usually priced competitively. Nobody pays the full MSRP. Typically, you negotiate and work with them on the pricing.
What needs improvement with Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?
For areas of improvement, the main issue is with integrations. The Symantec ZTNA comprises many products cobbled together on the back end. Sometimes, the integrations work well; sometimes, they don...
What is your primary use case for Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?
The solution helps to allow access only to what is explicitly needed. This means restricting access to specific applications rather than providing broad access to multiple resources, some of which ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Symantec Secure Access Cloud, Luminate.io, Luminate
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NEX, AIG, Fiverr, Upwork
Sani Marc, Great Clips, MIO Partners, ACT Commodities, Evercore, Atlantic Constructors
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies, Tailscale and others in ZTNA. Updated: April 2026.
892,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.