We performed a comparison between Symantec Data Center Security and Tripwire IP360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud and Data Center Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Docker containers make it easy to develop, deploy, and deliver applications where containers can be deployed and brought down in a matter of seconds. This flexibility makes it very useful for DevOps to automate deployment of containers. Symantec Data Center Security: Server Advanced provides agentless Docker container protection that allows you to achieve the performance benefits of Docker without sacrificing security. Full application control enables administrator privilege de-escalation, patch mitigation, and protection against zero day threats in today's heterogeneous data centers.
Tripwire IP360 delivers risk-based vulnerability assessment and asset discovery capabilities. With IP360, you get:
Symantec Data Center Security is ranked 8th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 2 reviews while Tripwire IP360 is ranked 21st in Vulnerability Management. Symantec Data Center Security is rated 7.0, while Tripwire IP360 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Symantec Data Center Security writes "Great file integrity monitoring features; lacking in reporting capabilities and support". On the other hand, Symantec Data Center Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Symantec Endpoint Security, VMware NSX and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, whereas Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable.sc, Veracode and SonarQube. See our Symantec Data Center Security vs. Tripwire IP360 report.
We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.