We performed a comparison between IBM B2B Integrator and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive."
"Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations."
"This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."
"It can scale horizontally as well as vertically as a cluster."
"It is easy of use and it's easy to maintain. It's also faster to on-board partners."
"B2B Integrator is multi-platform, so it can be integrated with Windows, Unix, or whatever, and it can work with almost all programming languages. It can also transfer a lot of data in a short time. For instance, a system I recently implemented exchanges about 20 million files a day."
"The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data."
"Very flexible product; it allows implementing different flows on the same infrastructure."
"It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules."
"The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough."
"API-Fication required, and there should be more clarity on their cloud migration strategy."
"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough."
"There should be a single place to do things, rather than making it complicated, not moving away and truncating the old features but instead coming up with the new and still keeping the old stuff confuses people sometimes."
"They do not have a solid partner ecosystem, and they do not have a clear roadmap for down the line; they're missing that clear roadmap."
"The one thing that is lacking is easy visibility. It's hard to provide business users with a view into the statuses of their transactions."
"The dashboard is not integrated and should be bundled by the product vendor."
"IBM B2B Integrator could improve the business process itself, there is no resignation of duties and in terms of the console should be changed in a way that is more user-friendly."
"I would like for them to work in real-time."
Earn 20 points
IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 42 reviews while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 7th in Business-to-Business Middleware. IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "A widely-used, on-premises solution with tons of peer support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SAP Process Orchestration, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
