We performed a comparison between SonarQube and Venn Software based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution is simple to use and can be quickly deployed."
"We've configured it to run on each commit, providing feedback on our software quality. ]"
"It is working fine. It provides a good value for money."
"The SonarQube dashboard looks great."
"There is a free version."
"All the features of the solution are quite good."
"The product is simple."
"I like the by-default policies that are they, as they seem to cover most of what I need."
"We don't need to go to the physical office, and it only requires minimal supervision or assistance from our IT Team."
"It allows us to improve our security and prevent company files and data leaks."
"Since the software is launched directly from the computer, not remotely delivered, it has minimized latency and response time."
"This is a well-rounded solution, however, some features could be made available on the free version. The price of the solution could be reduced."
"There isn't a very good enterprise report."
"The pricing could be reduced a bit. It's a little expensive."
"If there was an official Docker image of SonarQube that could easily integrate into the pipeline would help the user to plug in and plug out and use it directly without any custom configuration. I am not sure if this is being offered already in an update but it would be very helpful."
"I don't believe you can have metrics of code quality based upon code analysis. I don't think it's possible for a computer to do it."
"The scanning part could be improved in SonarQube. We have used Coverity for scanning, and we have the critical issues reported by Coverity. When we used SonarQube for scanning and looked at the results, it seems that some of them have incorrect input. This part can be improved for C and C++ languages."
"Expression of common vulnerabilities and exposures is not always current."
"Dynamic scanning is missing and there are some issues with security scanning."
"It would be better to have the back end more efficient."
"We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities."
"Currently, Venn only uses two platforms/applications: Windows and Mac. It would be great if they could also add more platforms since some BYOD employees might be using an application other than Windows or Mac - for example, Linux."
SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 110 reviews while Venn Software is ranked 28th in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews. SonarQube is rated 8.0, while Venn Software is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Venn Software writes "Great for hybrid workers, minimizes latency and delivers great performance". SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk, whereas Venn Software is most compared with Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and Microsoft Intune. See our SonarQube vs. Venn Software report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
