SnapLogic vs Unifi comparison

"By using snaps instead of functions in code, you can see the building blocks of the integration visually. This helps a lot."

"Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently."

"The vendor handles the maintenance of the solution"

"The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten."

"The solutions ability to connect "snaps" or components to the graphic user interface is very intuitive, prevents errors, and makes implementations easy."

"It is a scalable solution."

"You can use other languages, such as Python, and easily connect to other systems."

"I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL."

"It's easy to manage and support the user, our guests, and our customers if they have a problem."

"The controller makes it easy to control everything from one platform. The management is easy."

"Ultra Pipelines provides real-time ingestion but it needs some adjustment."

"It needs some more snaps. I would like to see some of the features be changed in some of the snaps."

"While new features are always welcome, I do not have anything else at the top of my mind currently."

"If the AI capabilities and integrations were more intuitive and easy for new users to learn, it would be greatly beneficial."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

"I don't think the support has better knowledge about technologies and tool support. There were lots of times when we had an issue, and it took me quite a long time to explain the problem. I feel like some of the support staff don't know their product well."

"We'd like zero downtime in the future."

"The support is the most important improvement they could make."

"It's stable, but it depends on the office and location."

"There are issues with certain Apple devices."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

"They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"I used the free trial."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"The pricing is okay."

"There is no license. The solution is free."