SAP Process Orchestration vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAP Logo
3,771 views|1,590 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
WSO2 Logo
1,115 views|798 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten.""The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced.""Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity.""The solution is easy to use.""It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business.""t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution.""The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are its system monitoring and alerts.""The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pros →

"The learning curve for this solution is very good.""It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well.""The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable.""The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone.""It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system.""In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users.""The stability is excellent.""Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Pros →

Cons
"The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life.""The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users.""It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud.""It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way.""SAP Process Orchestration breaks down sometimes.""The usability is an area where it can be improved upon.""The older version of the solution will no longer be supported.""The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."

More SAP Process Orchestration Cons →

"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach.""The integration capabilities need to be improved.""They should release upgrades more frequently.""There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced.""In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience.""The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution.""The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required.""I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."
  • "The pricing for this solution is fine."
  • "There are fees in addition to the licensing."
  • "It's not an expensive solution."
  • "Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."
  • "The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."
  • "The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."
  • "The fee for maintenance is costly."
  • More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."
  • "The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."
  • "The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."
  • "It is a low-cost solution."
  • "The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."
  • "I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
  • More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.
    Top Answer:We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable. We find that the cost is even more affordable compared to other options available in the market.
    Top Answer:Implementing changes and introducing new interfaces in Process Orchestration should have been more straightforward. The current system is burdened with a heavy load and has become overly complex… more »
    Top Answer:WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.
    Top Answer:The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive since… more »
    Top Answer:The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components. Some workloads may benefit from optimization or additional features… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,771
    Comparisons
    1,590
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    8.4
    19th
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    1,115
    Comparisons
    798
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    545
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
    Learn More
    Overview
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

    WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

    Sample Customers
    Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
    West
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company30%
    Wholesaler/Distributor17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government6%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business-to-Business Middleware
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 19th in Data Integration with 18 reviews. SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and BizTalk Server, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.

    We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.