SAP Information Steward vs SAS Data Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAP Logo
1,251 views|714 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SAS Logo
351 views|279 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAP Information Steward and SAS Data Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Quality Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits.""The most valuable features are data quality insight, metadata management, and metadata dictionary.""Initial setup was straightforward.""The Data Cleansing and the scorecard dashboard are very valuable. Additionally, the financial aspect of SAP Information Steward is very good. When a rule is incorrect then it will show how much is it costing the business. These features are very valuable.""Data insight is the most valuable feature.""The data profiling was excellent, as was the ease of generating the dashboards.""Setup is straightforward.""Ability to collect information, monitor user access and to plan storage capacity."

More SAP Information Steward Pros →

"This is an established product with powerful data analysis and varied options for user entry points.""I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize.""In terms of which features I have found most valuable, I would say the importing and exporting features. Additionally, the data sorting, categorizing and summarizing features, especially how it can summarize based on categories. These are the key features.""The tool is reliable, quick, and powerful.""Its robustness is valuable. It is a full-fledged suite. We have a data warehouse model, and there are also a lot of data quality management tools. The repository and all other tools are there. So, it is a full package in terms of reporting tools.""If you compare it to SQL, the memory and development times are very quick.""The product offers very good flexibility.""The solution is very stable. We haven't faced any issues with glitches or bugs. We haven't had any crashes."

More SAS Data Management Pros →

Cons
"A problem with the solution is that it does not allow us to review the results of Information Stewards for other analogies.""The support team is not very responsive.""Granularity could be reduced from an application level to the object level.""The solution could improve by incorporating other applications, such as Power BI to show more visualization. More interaction with other solutions would be a good benefit.""We'd like to see some manipulation techniques included in SAP Information Steward.""Performance could be improved.""Needs to be more powerful on rules.""SAP Information Steward could be improved by offering a cloud version of the product."

More SAP Information Steward Cons →

"The pricing of the solution needs to be improved. They need to work to make it more affordable.""We implemented it a while ago, and we are trying to improve the data delivery performance. We are looking into how to get faster and automated reporting. We would need better designs and workflows.""Very little needs to improve but perhaps a nicer graphic interface and remaining competetive in the growing field of data analytics.""With SAS Data Management, you have to purchase an external driver, configure all of the tables for all of the data that you will extract from Salesforce. It's not a straightforward process.""I would like the tool to include the ability to automate the modifications of the integrations.""We find we often have to go back and re-train users when there are changes made to the solution because the changes are not intuitive.""The solution is quite expensive and hard to install/configure.""The solution could use better documentation."

More SAS Data Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I do not know if there were additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."
  • "SAP Information Steward is an expensive solution compared to others."
  • "A bit pricey, and better tools are available for a lower price."
  • "Smaller-sized organizations may not be able to invest in SAP Information Steward because of the cost."
  • More SAP Information Steward Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "While it is even free for personal use on the cloud, it can be expensive for desktop installations and enterprise use."
  • "The tool is a bit expensive."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More SAS Data Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits.
    Top Answer:Smaller-sized organizations may not be able to invest in SAP Information Steward because of the cost.
    Top Answer:SAP Information Steward could be improved by offering a cloud version of the product. Rather than creating an evolution of this product, they have created a completely different solution with Data… more »
    Top Answer:I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize.
    Top Answer:I would like the tool to include the ability to automate the modifications of the integrations.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 56 in Data Quality
    Views
    1,251
    Comparisons
    714
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    7.8
    13th
    out of 56 in Data Quality
    Views
    351
    Comparisons
    279
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    180
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Information Steward, SAP Data Insight
    SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux
    Learn More
    Overview

    Monitor, analyze, and improve data integrity with SAP Information Steward software.  Combine data profiling and metadata management tools for continuous insight into the quality of enterprise information to optimize processes, and enhance operational, analytical, and data governance initiatives.

    Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

    Sample Customers
    American Water, Graphic Packaging International, OSRAM Licht AG, Maxim Integrated
    Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Insurance Company10%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Quality
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SAP Information Steward is ranked 6th in Data Quality with 9 reviews while SAS Data Management is ranked 13th in Data Quality with 15 reviews. SAP Information Steward is rated 7.6, while SAS Data Management is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SAP Information Steward writes "Great for collecting, monitoring and planning storage capacity; functionality could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Data Management writes "A scalable solution with customer support that is responsive and diligent". SAP Information Steward is most compared with SAP Data Quality Management, SAP Data Services, SAP PowerDesigner, Innovative Systems iLytics Enterprise Data Quality and Syniti Information Management, whereas SAS Data Management is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Tungsten RPA, Microsoft Purview, IBM InfoSphere DataStage and Palantir Foundry.

    See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

    We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.