IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise vs SingleStore comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Relational Databases
June 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: June 2022.
610,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy.""Provides very good integration.""This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Pros →

"MemSQL supports the MySQL protocol, and many functions are similar, so the learning curve is very short."

More SingleStore Pros →

Cons
"User interface could be more user friendly.""I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope.""SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Cons →

"There should be more pipelines available because I think that if MemSQL can connect to other services, that would be great."

More SingleStore Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I would advise users to try the free 128GB version."
  • More SingleStore Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    610,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control… more »
    Top Answer:The setup cost is a bit expensive, but the pricing and licensing are just right.
    Top Answer:SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    15th
    Views
    1,832
    Comparisons
    1,027
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    370
    Rating
    8.0
    6th
    Views
    3,071
    Comparisons
    2,181
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,087
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SAP ASE
    Learn More
    Overview

    With SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (SAP ASE), you can handle massive volumes of data and thousands of concurrent users to accelerate the growth of new data-driven business applications. Drive value with a faster, more efficient transactional system that is designed to meet the demands of the digital economy.

    Lenses is a simple and secure self service DataOps platform, to operate with confidence on Apache Kafka & Kubernetes.

    Offer
    Learn more about SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise
    Learn more about SingleStore
    Sample Customers
    City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International (ARI), Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba (Grupo Neoenergia), RZD Russian Railways, National Basketball Association - NBA, TALLY
    Uber, Akamai, Dell EMC, Samsung, Comcast, Kellogg
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Relational Databases
    June 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: June 2022.
    610,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is ranked 15th in Relational Databases with 3 reviews while SingleStore is ranked 6th in Database as a Service with 1 review. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is rated 8.0, while SingleStore is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise writes "Provides integration and ease of access to reporting; UI could be more user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SingleStore writes "MySQL Big Brother with built-in data pipeline, high concurrency, and blazing fast analytical queries". SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is most compared with SQL Server, SAP HANA, IBM Db2 Database, Oracle Database and SAP SQL Anywhere, whereas SingleStore is most compared with MySQL, CockroachDB, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, SQL Server and Oracle Database.

    We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.