Salt Security vs Tenable Nessus comparison

The compared Salt Security and Tenable solutions aren't in the same category. Salt Security is ranked #5 in APIS , and holds a 7.7% mindshare in the category. Tenable is ranked #2 in VM , with an average rating of 8.6, and holds a 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Salt Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Salt Security

Read 1 Salt Security review

975 Views
858 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable Nessus

Read 87 Tenable Nessus reviews

9,508 Views
7,606 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Salt Security

Tenable Nessus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Salt Security and Tenable Nessus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai, Imperva, Checkmarx and others in API Security.

To learn more, read our detailed API Security Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

API Security

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 879,889 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Salt Security

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (5th), AI Security (12th)

Tenable Nessus

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Salt Security is designed for API Security and holds a mindshare of 7.7%, down 13.8% compared to last year.
Tenable Nessus, on the other hand, focuses on Vulnerability Management, holds 5.2% mindshare, down 10.3% since last year.

API Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Salt Security	7.7%
Akamai API Security	9.8%
Imperva Application Security Platform	7.9%
Other	74.6%

API Security

Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tenable Nessus	5.2%
Wiz	7.5%
Qualys VMDR	5.0%
Other	82.3%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

IgmarRautenbach

Managing Director at Tegra

Provides visibility and control over all APIs

I've built integrations for different systems, and some specific integrations might not be built in yet. This might be an issue for large customers but is not a major concern overall. So, the integration part could be a bit extended. Every organization has different systems, but Salt integrates with 90% of them. If a custom integration is needed, they can build it. They're very good at integrations. So, Salt Security can provide a proof of concept with system integration and share results within two weeks, which often leads to customer purchases. At this point, the product covers everything needed. They keep adding new features, and my local customers haven't requested any missing functionality. The product roadmap is good for the market.

Read full review

MohammedJaffir

Founder at Cipheroot

Has enabled me to reduce false positives and perform deep credential auditing with seamless integrations

I mostly use the configuration audit feature for the audit configuration as a scan policy, and I will use it for credential audit, which helps me scan credentials access such as local administrator or root access, performing a deeper and more accurate check of local configuration settings and file systems, making it a highly recommended feature. Regarding integration capabilities, we can integrate Tenable Nessus with SIM tools such as Splunk, IBM QRadar, and Azure Sentinel, as well as with ticketing systems such as ServiceNow, Jira, and Slack. There is no complexity as it is very easy to integrate everything. In terms of the reporting feature, while vulnerability scanning can throw some false positives, Tenable Nessus has very few, achieving a reduction of 75% to 80% false positives with manual analysis needed. We can generate standard Nessus reports that typically include host summaries and vulnerabilities by host and plugin, alongside solutions and remediation recommendations. The main benefits I get from Tenable Nessus are complete asset inventory and comprehensive attack surface management, allowing us to prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk, focusing on true risk and threat path analysis.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's really great. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I haven't encountered any instability issues."

"The most valuable features of Tenable Nessus are the scanning option. Advanced scanning is highly useful. The offline config audits and application assessments are useful."

"The main benefits I get from Tenable Nessus are complete asset inventory and comprehensive attack surface management, allowing us to prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk, focusing on true risk and threat path analysis."

"Overall Zoom is a good solution."

"The trial version is very good for testing whether it will suit your needs."

"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is the dashboard. They are convenient to use."

"The plug-in text information is quite useful."

"Vulnerability assessment is the most valuable feature in Tenable Nessus, as it provides brief details regarding the vulnerability issues we have in our network."

"The solution is easy to understand for users because instructions are included on the platform."

More Tenable Nessus pros

Cons

"The integration part could be a bit extended."

"We'd like to see the solution embrace more user-friendliness."

"Sometimes, the categorization for clients was tricky at first, however, they eventually got used to it."

"The reports are okay, but the interface is a bit difficult to navigate in some cases."

"We use credentialed scans. They need more permissions and more changes or settings on Windows and Linux."

"The report for counters is too simple and would be improved by a dashboard."

"Technically, it is an excellent and the best solution available in Libya. My only concern is related to its pricing. They are an emerging company in Libya, and they need to put in some effort to provide us with very good prices so that customers can go with the best solution. Chinese companies are getting into the market here, and they're providing very cheap solutions."

"There should be a possibility to install agents on scanned machines. Tenable IO provides the capability of using local agents to check local problems, but this feature is not there in Tenable Nessus Professional. It would be nice to have something similar in Tenable Nessus Professional. We should have the capability to use local agents installed on the machines to locally check a problem."

"We have had some false positives in the past, which we hope can improve in the future."

More Tenable Nessus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost is around $4,300 per year. Use is unlimited. You don't pay more if you want to use it for another IP."

"The price is reasonable."

"The price of Tenable Nessus is too expensive for each service center."

"The solution is worth the cost. It's a good investment."

"Nessus is affordable, but its licensing model could be improved with more flexibility for adding assets."

"Its price is high for Libya. The companies here in Libya don't have the awareness of and a good budget for cybersecurity services. If you want them to go for a product, you need to provide something different. This differentiation is related to the price. They should give about 40% to 45% discount per person on the current cost."

"We incurred a single cost for a perpetual license, although I cannot comment on the price as this is above my management level."

"The price of Tenable Nessus could improve, it is expensive."

More Tenable Nessus pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Salt Security?

It's really great. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I haven't encountered any instability issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Salt Security?

It is an annual subscription fee. It's very affordable. The value it provides justifies the cost, considering automation and availability features. Compared to other solutions, it's within a typica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Salt Security?

See all answers

How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?

You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable Nessus?

We have around 500 virtual machines. Therefore, we conduct monthly scans and open tickets for our developers to address identified vulnerabilities. These scans cover the servers, other network equi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Akamai API Security vs Salt Security

Compared 25% of the time

Cequence Security vs Salt Security

Compared 24% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Salt Security

Compared 13% of the time

Traceable AI vs Salt Security

Compared 13% of the time

Orca Security vs Salt Security

Compared 11% of the time

More Salt Security Competitors

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Nessus

Compared 11% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Nessus

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Nessus

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Nessus

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Nessus

Compared 5% of the time

More Tenable Nessus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Security

January 2026

Download Salt Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Nessus

December 2025

Download Tenable Nessus product report

Also Known As

Salt Security API Protection Platform

No data available

Overview

The Salt Security API Protection Platform secures the APIs at the heart of all your modern applications. The platform collects API traffic across your entire application landscape and makes use of AI/ML and a big data engine to discover all your APIs and their exposed data, stop attacks, and eliminate vulnerabilities at their source.

Salt Security

Tenable Nessus provides an efficient vulnerability management system with swift deployment and comprehensive scanning capabilities, making it an ideal choice for organizations seeking to enhance their security posture through effective threat detection and mitigation strategies.

Renowned for its top-tier vulnerability detection, Tenable Nessus offers a robust platform that integrates effortlessly across systems, enhancing threat management through automation, real-time monitoring, and customizable scanning options. Its broad asset coverage, including network devices and applications, coupled with ease of deployment, positions it as a go-to option for risk assessment and compliance. Organizations value its extensive reporting features and database, although they suggest enhancements in reporting formats and false positive detection. A more intuitive interface, improved cloud support, and competitive pricing models are sought after to cater to evolving enterprise needs.

What are the key features of Tenable Nessus?

Comprehensive Vulnerability Detection: Identifies security gaps across systems and platforms.
Remedy Recommendations: Provides actionable insights for vulnerability fixes.
Predictive Prioritization: Helps in focusing on critical vulnerabilities first.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with diverse platforms for cohesive threat management.
Automation Capabilities: Streamlines routine scans and reports.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Fast Setup: Quick deployment that saves time and resources.
Cost-Effective: Affordable pricing supports budget-conscious cyber strategies.
Real-Time Monitoring: Offers continuous oversight of system health.
Extensive Reports: Detailed insights enhance decision-making processes.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and tech, Tenable Nessus is implemented for scanning internal and external networks, identifying risks, and ensuring data protection compliance. Organizations conduct regular scans to detect security vulnerabilities in servers and databases, leveraging its capabilities to strengthen their security frameworks while managing cloud infrastructures and enterprise networks efficiently.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Appsflyer, Armis, City National Bank, Coralogix, Finastra, Gett, Honeybook, Payoneer

Bitbrains, Tesla, Just Eat, Crosskey Banking Solutions, Covenant Health, Youngstown State University

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai, Imperva, Checkmarx and others in API Security. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.