No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Sahi Pro vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Sahi Pro
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (17th)
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (9th), Test Management Tools (5th)
 

Featured Reviews

Vipul Saxena - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at PureSoftware Ltd
Easy to deploy, good technical support, and stable
Sahi Pro can improve the transformation process. Suppose we are working in Python and we want to view our code in Python. If the conversion is available, it would be much easier for the user to support Python users, making it a better tool if it can be converted into different languages including Java Script.
Payel Saha - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting
Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"There are many features that are very easy to use, such as the identification of commands."
"This product is a nine out of ten."
"The stability is great, I trust in the solution."
"The solution is easy to use and they have also integrated with Microsoft."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"We aren't bothered by the pricing of the solution at all due to the fact that it provides us with a lot of great tools."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"Microsoft programs are usually very easy and straightforward to install."
"The product is very easy to use and we were able to scale up the automation solution quickly which was beneficial."
 

Cons

"Sahi Pro can improve the transformation process."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its scalability."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
"The stability of this solution needs to be improved because sometimes it hangs and crashes."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"There are some bugs, and sometimes it runs very slowly, but nothing that is major."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Sahi Pro is priced well."
"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."
"There are two versions of Visual Studio Test Professional: Community and Professional. We are currently using the Community version, but if we start working on a commercial product, we will consider upgrading to the Professional version. We need to identify how we will proceed with our projects, and based on that, we will decide on our licensing."
"We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."
"I think that the pricing is quite good."
"It is a price-effective solution"
"We pay a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional, which is expensive."
"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."
"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
912,753 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise25
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?
The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.
What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?
Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio C...
What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional?
We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for automation testing, specifically using C# Selenium.Visual Studio Test Case Management, which is embedded in Azure DevOps itself, is part of our process. We ...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: August 2026.
912,753 professionals have used our research since 2012.