SafeBreach vs XM Cyber comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SafeBreach Logo
2,055 views|1,163 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
XM Cyber Logo
2,111 views|1,079 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SafeBreach and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed SafeBreach vs. XM Cyber Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods.""The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."

More SafeBreach Pros →

"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable.""The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."

More XM Cyber Pros →

Cons
"There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable.""I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support."

More SafeBreach Cons →

"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas.""We'd like to see a cheaper price."

More XM Cyber Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price starts from about $140,000 so this solution is expensive in my opinion. Maintenance and support is included in the license cost."
  • "The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today."
  • More SafeBreach Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have to pay standard licensing fees."
  • More XM Cyber Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection.
    Top Answer:The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today.
    Top Answer:I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support.
    Top Answer:The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation.
    Top Answer:We have to pay standard licensing fees. There are no additional costs. It is an expensive product. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,055
    Comparisons
    1,163
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    178
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    2,111
    Comparisons
    1,079
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    294
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 29% of the time.
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 23% of the time.
    Pentera logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    AttackIQ logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Verodin logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Pentera logo
    Compared 30% of the time.
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tenable Security Center logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Qualys VMDR logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    SafeBreach is the world's most widely used continuous security validation platform in enterprise companies. The company's patented platform empowers CISOs and their teams to validate security controls, maximize their effectiveness, and drive down risk. 

    SafeBreach provides a "hacker's view" of an enterprise's security posture by continuously validating security controls and presenting findings in customized dashboards to enable stakeholders to cleanly focus on the biggest risk to the organization. SafeBreach automatically and safely executes thousands of attack methods to validate network, endpoint, cloud, container, and email security controls against the Hacker's Playbook, the world's largest collection of attack data broken down by methods, tactics, and threat actors. Data from SafeBreach validations can improve SOC team responses and empower management to make smarter decisions to better manage risk and invest resources.

    XM Cyber is a leading hybrid cloud security company that’s changing the way innovative organizations approach cyber risk. Our attack path management platform continuously uncovers hidden attack paths to your critical assets across cloud and on-prem environments, so you can cut them off at key junctures and eradicate risk with a fraction of the effort. This overcomes the big disconnect that security teams experience when they’re presented with endless alerts, yet can’t see which exposures impact risk the most, how they come together to be exploited by an attacker, or how to efficiently eliminate them. This approach is a complete game-changer, which is why some of the world’s largest, most complex organizations choose XM Cyber to help eradicate risk. Founded by top executives from the Israeli cyber intelligence community, XM Cyber has offices in North America, Europe, and Israel.

    Sample Customers
    PayPal, ICON, Netflix, Johnson & Johnson, CVS Health, Pepsi, Kellogg's, Cisco, Deloitte
    Hamburg Port Authority, Plymouth Rock Corporation
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    SafeBreach vs. XM Cyber
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SafeBreach vs. XM Cyber and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SafeBreach is ranked 6th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews while XM Cyber is ranked 5th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. SafeBreach is rated 8.0, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SafeBreach writes "Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". SafeBreach is most compared with Picus Security, Cymulate, Pentera, AttackIQ and Verodin, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security, Tenable Security Center and Qualys VMDR. See our SafeBreach vs. XM Cyber report.

    See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

    We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.