We performed a comparison between RSA SecurID Access and Starling Two-Factor Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Authentication Systems solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Earn 20 points
The RSA SecurID Suite combines the separate disciplines of access management and authentication with identity governance and user lifecycle management into one comprehensive suite. It goes way beyond the capabilities of traditional identity and access management systems by using risk analytics to provide identity and access assurance. This helps organizations solve two fundamental challenges:
With Starling Two-Factor Authentication, a SaaS-based solution, you can secure your organization and keep users productive. It solves the password problem without the capital costs or increased infrastructure management often incurred with traditional on-premises solutions.
RSA SecurID Access is ranked 8th in Authentication Systems with 1 review while Starling Two-Factor Authentication is ranked 46th in Authentication Systems. RSA SecurID Access is rated 7.0, while Starling Two-Factor Authentication is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of RSA SecurID Access writes "Scalable and secure, but could be more compliant-based". On the other hand, RSA SecurID Access is most compared with Microsoft Authenticator, Yubico YubiKey, PingID, Fortinet FortiToken and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas Starling Two-Factor Authentication is most compared with .
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.