Microsoft Entra ID vs RSA SecurID comparison

Microsoft and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while RSA is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.0. Microsoft holds a 15.3% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of RSA users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 234 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

25,521 Views
7,912 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

RSA SecurID

Read 9 RSA SecurID reviews

3,353 Views
2,984 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

RSA SecurID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

RSA SecurID and Microsoft Entra ID compete in the security solutions category. Based on user reviews, RSA SecurID excels in support and ease of deployment, while Microsoft Entra ID often edges out in overall features and ROI.

What features are offered by RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Users highlight the valuable two-factor authentication, robust security integrations, and advanced threat detection of RSA SecurID. Microsoft Entra ID is praised for its comprehensive identity management, seamless integration with Microsoft services, and multi-factor authentication. Entra ID's features generally appeal more to users due to their broader scope and versatility.

What areas of improvement can be found in RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

User reviews suggest RSA SecurID could improve its mobile support, ease of use for non-technical users, and user interface. Microsoft Entra ID users seek better multi-cloud support, more efficient troubleshooting resources, and enhanced third-party integrations. Microsoft Entra ID's issues are more aligned with evolving tech trends.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

RSA SecurID is noted for smoother deployment, particularly in large enterprises, and has robust customer service. Microsoft Entra ID faces fewer deployment hurdles within Microsoft ecosystems but can be challenging in multi-vendor environments. Its customer service receives mixed reviews. RSA SecurID is favored for deployment ease and support responsiveness.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

RSA SecurID has a higher setup cost but provides a high ROI through enhanced security. Microsoft Entra ID offers competitive pricing, especially for existing Microsoft customers, and demonstrates a substantial ROI by leveraging Microsoft’s ecosystem. Users feel that despite the higher initial cost, RSA SecurID’s long-term security benefits justify the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

234

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Identity Management (IM) (2nd), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

RSA SecurID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 15.3%, down from 19.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA SecurID is 6.6%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Bahram Piri

Chief Executive Officer & Founder at IDmelon Technologies

Security focus and seamless implementation increase platform productivity

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved in many ways, and there's a big wish list.If we're focusing on security, something that I definitely expect is improvement in the UI and UX for frontline workers. This is important, especially for non-tech savvy individuals. It is something Microsoft Entra ID could do to improve for a wider audience. It's important to focus on the frontline workers since they are non-tech savvy individuals. They are not like those back-office engineering C-level employees who are constantly dealing with computers, and we need to build a specific user experience and user interface for them to handle this stuff. That's something I expect Microsoft to focus on more for Microsoft Entra ID.

Read full review

Chandan Tripathi

Identity and Access Management Principal at Mobily

Useful for making logins more secure by using multifactor authentication but extremely expensive

There is room for improvement in a few areas. Firstly, it lacks support for OIDC and OS capabilities, making it less versatile for integrating various applications. Secondly, there are some limitations in the number of supported applications. Lastly, it doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft Entra ID efficiently responds to numerous requests, and we have not faced significant connectivity issues, making it reliable."

"Using [Azure AD's] passwordless technology, you're not even using a password anymore. You're basically just creating a logon request without actually sending or typing or storing the password. This is awesome for any user, regardless of whether you're a factory worker or a CFO. It's secure and super-simple."

"It enhanced our end user experience quite a bit. Instead of the days of having to contact the service desk with challenges for choosing their password, users can go in and do it themselves locally, regardless of where they are in the world. This has certainly made it a better experience accessing their applications. Previously, a lot of times, they had to remember multiple usernames and passwords for different systems. This solution brings it all together, using a single sign-on experience."

"Single sign-on, license management, and role management are the most valuable features. Integration with Microsoft 365 is also very valuable."

"Microsoft Entra ID has also massively improved secure access to apps or resources compared to our previous setup."

"The most valuable feature of Azure AD is its ability to connect with services outside of Microsoft, although documentation is necessary to properly implement these connections."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to set up conditional access, where you can enforce users to connect using multifactor authentication."

"The valuable features I use daily are enterprise application, conditional access, identity governance, password monitoring, and a password reset."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things."

"One of the most valuable feature is the ID soft token and hard token."

"I would say that the two-factor authentication and the ease of installation and configuration are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment."

Cons

"Microsoft needs to make improvements in this regard and extend its services to other operating systems as well, especially when considering their widespread usage."

"Be aware that it may not work perfectly globally yet. There are still glitches with the solution in Africa."

"Microsoft's technical support has shortcomings where improvements are required."

"I would like to be able to authenticate Wi-Fi users using the Azure ID"

"Reading documentation could be simplified. Technical support could also be faster."

"The security policy of Azure Active Directory should be based on a matrix so that we can easily visualize which users have access to what."

"The onboarding process for new users can be improved. It can be made simpler for people who have never registered to Azure AD previously and need to create an account and enable the MFA. The initial setup can be made simpler for non-IT people. It should be a bit simpler to use. Unless you get certifications, such as AZ-300 and AZ-301, it is not a simple thing to use at the enterprise scale."

"Generally, everything works pretty well, but sometimes, Azure Active Directory has outages on the Microsoft side of things. These outages really have a very big impact on the users, applications, and everything else because they are closely tied to the Azure AD ecosystem. So, whenever there is an outage, it is really difficult because all things start failing. This happens very rarely, but when it happens, there is a big impact."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"The interface needs to improve a lot. It should be easier to manage and navigate."

"It doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility."

"Sometimes, we encounter issues with other applications that are not compatible with RSA SecurID Access and require expert troubleshooting. At those times, we need additional support from an implementation perspective. This is an area where Oracle can improve as there is no substitute for reliable and efficient support."

"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure AD comes with Office 365, so we are just paying for the Office 365 license."

"Entra ID is not too bad, but Microsoft licensing generally is insane. Most customers normally buy a bundle license with Microsoft 365, E3, or E5. Out of our 2,000 customers, for 99.9% of our customers, the Entra ID license that they are getting through the part of that would be sufficient. There are some more advanced ones that give you a bit more functionality, but we probably have not had a customer for that. We do not even internally use that ourselves. When you buy the Entra ID license on its own, it is probably three or four pounds. You just get it included in the license."

"We pay about $35 per user."

"Most features of Entra ID are part of Microsoft's ecosystem and included in Microsoft 365 bundles, which means there are no additional costs associated with pricing and licensing."

"The pricing for companies and businesses is okay, it's fair. But if you are trying to teach someone about Azure AD, there is no licensing option for that... It would be nice to have a 'learning' license, one that is cheaper for a single person."

"Its price is okay. It is easy to go from P1 to P2 license. It is not exactly a bargain, but I would recommend the P2 license."

"Azure AD has four licensing options- Free, Office 365 apps, Premium P1, and Premium P2. The free option has a limited number of identities and features, and the Office 365 version comes included in several Office 365 subscriptions. With the P1 and P2 licenses, we get all the freeware features plus additional security features, but these come at a higher price. The base price for P1 and P2 is $6 and $9 per user per month, respectively."

"The pricing for Azure Active Directory is affordable; I would rate the cost a six out of ten."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"I think the price of this solution is reasonable compared to YubiKey and Duo given that it offers the same similar features."

"RSA SecurID Access is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Our experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Microsoft Entra ID involves leveraging Microsoft 365 E5 licensing, so it's included. Being included in Microsoft licensing makes it mu...

See all answers

What do you like most about RSA SecurID Access?

The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RSA SecurID Access?

RSA SecurID Access is quite expensive. I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of costliness.

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA SecurID Access?

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 9% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 6% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Yubico YubiKey vs RSA SecurID

Compared 56% of the time

Cisco Duo vs RSA SecurID

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA SecurID

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiToken vs RSA SecurID

Compared 4% of the time

Thales Authenticators vs RSA SecurID

Compared 3% of the time

More RSA SecurID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

July 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

July 2025

Download RSA SecurID product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

RSA SecurID Access, RSA Access Manager

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

RSA

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

The RSA SecurID Suite combines the separate disciplines of access management and authentication with identity governance and user lifecycle management into one comprehensive suite. It goes way beyond the capabilities of traditional identity and access management systems by using risk analytics to provide identity and access assurance. This helps organizations solve two fundamental challenges:

Verifying that their users are who they say they are.
Providing their users with the right level of access.

RSA

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Milliman, Geisinger Health System, Advanced Micro Devices

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID

July 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.