Microsoft Entra ID vs RSA SecurID comparison

Microsoft and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while RSA is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.0. Microsoft holds a 15.7% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of RSA users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 234 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

8,927 Views
4,600 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

RSA SecurID

Read 9 RSA SecurID reviews

3,111 Views
2,045 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

RSA SecurID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

RSA SecurID and Microsoft Entra ID compete in the security solutions category. Based on user reviews, RSA SecurID excels in support and ease of deployment, while Microsoft Entra ID often edges out in overall features and ROI.

What features are offered by RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Users highlight the valuable two-factor authentication, robust security integrations, and advanced threat detection of RSA SecurID. Microsoft Entra ID is praised for its comprehensive identity management, seamless integration with Microsoft services, and multi-factor authentication. Entra ID's features generally appeal more to users due to their broader scope and versatility.

What areas of improvement can be found in RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

User reviews suggest RSA SecurID could improve its mobile support, ease of use for non-technical users, and user interface. Microsoft Entra ID users seek better multi-cloud support, more efficient troubleshooting resources, and enhanced third-party integrations. Microsoft Entra ID's issues are more aligned with evolving tech trends.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

RSA SecurID is noted for smoother deployment, particularly in large enterprises, and has robust customer service. Microsoft Entra ID faces fewer deployment hurdles within Microsoft ecosystems but can be challenging in multi-vendor environments. Its customer service receives mixed reviews. RSA SecurID is favored for deployment ease and support responsiveness.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with RSA SecurID in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

RSA SecurID has a higher setup cost but provides a high ROI through enhanced security. Microsoft Entra ID offers competitive pricing, especially for existing Microsoft customers, and demonstrates a substantial ROI by leveraging Microsoft’s ecosystem. Users feel that despite the higher initial cost, RSA SecurID’s long-term security benefits justify the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

234

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Identity Management (IM) (2nd), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

RSA SecurID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 15.7%, down from 20.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA SecurID is 6.7%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Bahram Piri

Chief Executive Officer & Founder at IDmelon Technologies

Security focus and seamless implementation increase platform productivity

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved in many ways, and there's a big wish list.If we're focusing on security, something that I definitely expect is improvement in the UI and UX for frontline workers. This is important, especially for non-tech savvy individuals. It is something Microsoft Entra ID could do to improve for a wider audience. It's important to focus on the frontline workers since they are non-tech savvy individuals. They are not like those back-office engineering C-level employees who are constantly dealing with computers, and we need to build a specific user experience and user interface for them to handle this stuff. That's something I expect Microsoft to focus on more for Microsoft Entra ID.

Read full review

Chandan Tripathi

Identity and Access Management Principal at Mobily

Useful for making logins more secure by using multifactor authentication but extremely expensive

There is room for improvement in a few areas. Firstly, it lacks support for OIDC and OS capabilities, making it less versatile for integrating various applications. Secondly, there are some limitations in the number of supported applications. Lastly, it doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft Entra ID scales effectively with the growing needs of our organization, as we have never faced any challenges with its scalability."

"Conditional access and Privileged Identity Management (PIM) are the most valuable features from a security perspective."

"A couple of features are valuable, but the one that comes across the most to me is multi-factor authentication."

"Entra has made it easy to manage identity and access by integrating with all Microsoft services."

"Entra ID has helped us implement role-based authentication rather than conditional keys."

"The most valuable components of the solution are provisioning and deprovisioning since both features work...Microsoft Entra Verified ID is a very stable solution."

"The most valuable features of this solution are definitely the authorization and authentication, and the rule-based user validation."

"Microsoft Entra ID's integration capabilities influence our Zero Trust model by allowing us to enforce our Zero Trust model."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment."

"It is a scalable solution."

"One of the most valuable feature is the ID soft token and hard token."

"I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things."

"I would say that the two-factor authentication and the ease of installation and configuration are the most valuable features of this solution."

Cons

"They should put the features of P1 and P2 into a single license."

"I would like it to be easier to integrate third-party applications."

"Microsoft support has some room for improvement. I avoid contacting them because it can be time-consuming. They don't necessarily find the solution, but you have to be on call for them to connect and do things on your system remotely. You have to schedule a time to meet with them, and it's somewhat inconvenient."

"There is no great solution in the cloud for Conditional Access authentication and RADIUS-type authentication."

"The thing that is a bit annoying is the inability to nest groups. Because we run an Azure hybrid model, we have nested groups on-premise which does not translate well. So, we have written some scripts to kind of work around that. This is a feature request that we have put in previously to be able to use a group that is nested in Active Directory on-premise and have it handled the same way in Azure."

"I hope, in the roadmap, Microsoft eventually offers the same features as Okta. It will take some more time to mature."

"I rate Microsoft support four out of 10. Tier 1 and Tier 2 support could be better. It's not timely or professional."

"Generally, everything works pretty well, but sometimes, Azure Active Directory has outages on the Microsoft side of things. These outages really have a very big impact on the users, applications, and everything else because they are closely tied to the Azure AD ecosystem. So, whenever there is an outage, it is really difficult because all things start failing. This happens very rarely, but when it happens, there is a big impact."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based."

"Sometimes, we encounter issues with other applications that are not compatible with RSA SecurID Access and require expert troubleshooting. At those times, we need additional support from an implementation perspective. This is an area where Oracle can improve as there is no substitute for reliable and efficient support."

"The interface needs to improve a lot. It should be easier to manage and navigate."

"It doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think we're on the E3 — I think it was about 35 dollars per user."

"Make sure that you get the most out of your Office 365 licenses for Azure AD. If you have additional concerns for users who don't have an Office 365 license, consider Azure AD Premium P1 and P2. Be aware that you have to evaluate your license usage beforehand."

"It is a really nice tool and we have a license for the more complex model."

"As a nonprofit, we have A5 licenses for nonprofits in education, so we at least have some reduced costs."

"I'd recommend Azure Active Directory if you are a big company. For small or medium companies, it's probably not the best idea in the world because of the pricing. If you are a small company, you can probably deploy your own solutions because you're not handling a website with tons of traffic. If you are not like Adidas, Nike, or Walmart, you can do it in a way that is more localized than handling everything through a big price solution. However, Azure tends to provide you with solutions that are easier to use. If it was cheaper, I'd definitely recommend going for it."

"The licensing cost is a bit prohibitive."

"Pricing could always be better. You pay the premium for Microsoft. Sometimes, it is worth it, and at other times, you wish to have more licensing options, especially for smaller companies."

"MFA and P2 licenses for two Azures for fully-enabled scenarios and features cost a lot of money. This is where Okta is trying to get the prices down."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"RSA SecurID Access is expensive."

"I think the price of this solution is reasonable compared to YubiKey and Duo given that it offers the same similar features."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Our experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Microsoft Entra ID involves leveraging Microsoft 365 E5 licensing, so it's included. Being included in Microsoft licensing makes it mu...

See all answers

What do you like most about RSA SecurID Access?

The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RSA SecurID Access?

RSA SecurID Access is quite expensive. I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of costliness.

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA SecurID Access?

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 7% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Yubico YubiKey vs RSA SecurID

Compared 56% of the time

Cisco Duo vs RSA SecurID

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA SecurID

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiToken vs RSA SecurID

Compared 4% of the time

Thales Authenticators vs RSA SecurID

Compared 3% of the time

More RSA SecurID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

May 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

June 2025

Download RSA SecurID product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

RSA SecurID Access, RSA Access Manager

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

RSA

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

The RSA SecurID Suite combines the separate disciplines of access management and authentication with identity governance and user lifecycle management into one comprehensive suite. It goes way beyond the capabilities of traditional identity and access management systems by using risk analytics to provide identity and access assurance. This helps organizations solve two fundamental challenges:

Verifying that their users are who they say they are.
Providing their users with the right level of access.

RSA

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Milliman, Geisinger Health System, Advanced Micro Devices

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID

June 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA SecurID report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.