Zeenyx AscentialTest and ReadyAPI compete in the software testing environment category. ReadyAPI has an advantage in integration capabilities, making it preferable for extensive API testing, while Zeenyx AscentialTest is more appealing for cost-effectiveness and support.
Features: Zeenyx AscentialTest offers a strong automated testing framework with easy capturing of snapshots for creating app object libraries, seamless integration with Subversion for file versioning, and reusability of steps to enhance test automation efficiency. ReadyAPI provides a user-friendly interface with advanced API testing features, seamless integrations with CI/CD tools, and robust functionality for functional, load, and security testing.
Room for Improvement: Zeenyx AscentialTest could enhance its user experience with more intuitive navigation and improve speed for handling large data sets. Its integration with modern version control systems could be expanded, and additional support for more application platforms could add value. ReadyAPI can improve its learning curve for new users by simplifying interfaces further and offering more detailed documentation. It can enhance its reporting capabilities for more complex test outcomes and expand its scripting support beyond Groovy for greater versatility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zeenyx AscentialTest typically provides a straightforward deployment process with strong support, focusing on a smooth setup for varied environments. ReadyAPI presents a more complex deployment process suited for extensive system integrations, supported by robust customer service for troubleshooting and integration issues.
Pricing and ROI: Zeenyx AscentialTest stands out with competitive pricing and a favorable ROI, appealing to teams with budget constraints or smaller teams. ReadyAPI may involve a higher initial setup cost but delivers substantial ROI through its comprehensive API solutions and advanced features, making it viable for environments requiring in-depth API management.
SmartBear had an ALM tool that helped manage project documentation, including Jira-related specifications, test plans, and test cases.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
ReadyAPI's performance testing capabilities can impact API scalability assessments.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI.
I'm considering the use of AWS and its Lambda functionalities prepared by the vendor.
Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
It also aids in faster feedback to developers, allowing them to implement developments in a sprint without the need for extensive testing afterwards, thus improving our time to market metrics.
I consider ReadyAPI a cost-effective solution because it covers three verticals without needing to purchase separate tools for security, performance, or functional testing.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
