Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Rapid7 and Keysight Technologies solutions aren't in the same category. Rapid7 is ranked #5 in DAST , with an average rating of 7.7, and holds a 5.5% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 94% of Rapid7 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Read 21 Rapid7 InsightAppSec reviews

3,723 Views
1,787 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightAppSec and Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).

To learn more, read our detailed Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,743 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (5th), AI Observability (23rd)

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Brandi Lea

Regional Information Security Analyst, Lead at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Rapid risk detection has transformed how I uncover hidden vulnerabilities in new applications

Rapid7 InsightAppSec offers excellent features including a cloud-based platform that allows for detailed breakdowns of information into more digestible bits. The platform is user-friendly with a broad range of tools, although it does require quite a bit of a learning curve. It allows me to aggregate data and put it into presentations to send to executives about the security status across the entire enterprise. My favorite aspect of the user-friendly interface of Rapid7 is the primary cloud-based dashboard, which I find most useful. I love that even inside a browser, the intuitive help options are available for figuring out what things are, whether it's hovering over a particular option for insights or using right-click features that offer tools and tips on managing the vulnerabilities when found. The interface is very clean, not overly convoluted or difficult to navigate, which I do enjoy. Rapid7 has positively impacted my organization by allowing me to discover vulnerabilities, both publicly known and zero-day, much faster and efficiently than I ever did in the past, ultimately saving the company a lot of money in compliance issues, fines, and possibly even lawsuits. The number of vulnerabilities I am discovering has improved by almost thirty seven percent in the last two years alone. Remediation especially has increased significantly because I am finding these vulnerabilities faster, and Rapid7 provides tips on how to remediate or harden against them, whether through hardening options or upgrading to better versions, which does save the company money.

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is stable."

"The reporting functionality is excellent."

"The initial setup for us was easy enough. We didn't face too many issues. Deployment took maybe 30 minutes. It's quite quick and doesn't cause too much trouble at the outset."

"The templates feature is very easy; you just choose the kind of attack you want on your web application, and you run it against that template and receive a report, which is great."

"Rapid7 MDR has positively impacted my organization by allowing me to discover vulnerabilities, both publicly known and zero-day, much faster and efficiently than I ever did in the past, ultimately saving the company a lot of money in compliance issues, fines, and possibly even lawsuits."

"It uses a signature-based method to check for problems with your code and will provide an alert if anything is found."

"The product’s most valuable feature is UI. It is easy to manage and find vulnerabilities in the application."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the graphical interface."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec pros

"If any customer doubts their existing network security policy this is a perfect product to analyze their network security and even existing processes."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"CyberFlood is bundled and basic, but it's still powerful and easy to use, and I would recommend it, especially for beginners."

Cons

"The number of web applications we can scan is limited."

"The interface should be a little bit easier to manage. Sometimes, the logic that they use is kind of strange. They need to work a little bit more on their interface to make it more understandable. The interface is the only problem. I'm using Rapid7, which is very intuitive. There are other applications available in the market with a better interface. They can include more techniques or options to test different types of security because the templates are limited. It would be great to see them follow the MITRE ATT&CK framework or what is there in tools like Veracode and Synopsys."

"In terms of behavioral and pattern recognition, identifying complex attacks such as SQL, blind SQL, JSON, and LDAP injections often results in 94% false positives."

"The interface should be a little bit easier to manage. Sometimes, the logic that they use is kind of strange."

"Customers sometimes experience issues with performance."

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec needs improvement in detecting phishing pages."

"They should add more features. I would like to see them do a little more on static analysis and also interactivity analysis. Currently, it does very basic static analysis. It could do a little more static analysis, which is something that would help. A lot more interactivity analysis should also be there. It should basically look at security during interactivity."

"In the future, if they can have integration with a lot of ticketing systems then it would be amazing."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec cons

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Rapid7 InsightAppSec is cheap."

"They offer a good price, but I don't remember its cost. It is fair as compared to the competition. We have opted for project-based licensing, not user-based. We can add any number of users. That doesn't matter. It is worth the money."

"The price of this product is very cheap."

"I'm not sure how much it costs exactly, but I know it's expensive."

"Its price is competitive. It is not expensive."

"I rate Rapid7 InsightAppSec’s pricing an eight out of ten."

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,743 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

While Rapid7 InsightAppSec is getting better with each update or version, it needs to enhance its zero-day detection for anomalous things without relying on third-party solutions like Vericode. Hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

My main use case for Rapid7 is onboarding all new applications both built in house and third party acquired, where I run them through a sandbox environment and allow Rapid7 to conduct an initial sc...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Rapid7 InsightAppSec?

If you are looking for a solution that will help identify vulnerabilities and provide remediation tips for hardening your infrastructure, I think Rapid7 does an excellent job. While I do not know t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?

The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...

See all answers

Comparisons

Invicti vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 14% of the time

AppCheck vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 12% of the time

Veracode vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 12% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 12% of the time

StackHawk vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec

Compared 10% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Competitors

HCL AppScan vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Sqreen vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Invicti Web + API vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

GitLab vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightAppSec

October 2026

Download Rapid7 InsightAppSec product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2026

Download Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] product report

Also Known As

InsightAppSec

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

Rapid7 InsightAppSec is a cloud-based security tool offering robust web scanning capabilities with a user-friendly interface and seamless integration. It enhances dynamic application security testing through customizable modules, providing comprehensive reports and remediation guidance.

InsightAppSec delivers dynamic application security testing with features like Attack Replay and a centralized dashboard for vulnerability insights. It supports flexible deployment options and simplifies scheduling frequent scans. The tool's intuitive graphical interface and extensive scanning coverage make it valuable for identifying vulnerabilities in web applications, APIs, and e-commerce sites, ensuring compliance. However, improvements are needed in detection accuracy, reporting options, and integrations with external tools like WAF and ticketing systems. There is a need for better scan management, support for mobile applications, customized reporting options, pricing flexibility, improved support, and AI integration.

What are the key features of InsightAppSec?

Seamless Integration: Easily integrates within SDLC for automated scans.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers an intuitive graphical experience.
Robust Web Scanning: Provides extensive vulnerability scanning of web applications and APIs.
Customizable Attack Modules: Tailors testing to meet specific security needs.
Attack Replay: Facilitates re-testing of potential vulnerabilities for accuracy.
Centralized Dashboard: Offers comprehensive insights into vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users look for?

Comprehensive Reports: Delivers detailed insights into security vulnerabilities.
Remediation Guidance: Provides actionable advice to fix identified vulnerabilities.
Scalability: Supports growth by handling increased demands efficiently.
Extensive Coverage: Ensures thorough security testing across multiple platforms.
Flexible Deployment: Adapts to different operational environments.

Industries rely on InsightAppSec for vulnerability scanning to secure web applications, APIs, and e-commerce platforms. Its integration within the SDLC aids in automating scans during development. While limitations exist with certain tool integrations, its cloud-based engine and effective reporting make it essential for internal and external application security assurance.

Rapid7

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] effectively minimizes network monitoring tasks with its impressive traffic generator and call flow function. Known for its user-friendliness, it supports network security testing and compliance across public and private clouds for large enterprises.

Users find Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] beneficial for comprehensive security evaluations, particularly in compliance and product testing. Its capabilities in generating SSL traffic assist in cybersecurity assessments, demonstrating flexibility and ease of use. The platform supports custom test assurance and automation, allowing financial and public sectors to enhance their cybersecurity measures. Despite its advantages, users desire improvements in ports, speed, multilingual support, browser accessibility, error reporting, and interface navigation.

What features does Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] offer?

Traffic Generator: Minimizes network monitoring tasks effectively.
Call Flow Function: Simplifies network processes for better management.
User-Friendliness: Enhances scheduling and usage efficiency.
Compliance Testing: Aids in product and compliance examinations.
Unauthorized File Transfer Monitoring: Ensures superior compliance performance.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Flexibility: Supports diverse network security testing scenarios.
Performance: Delivers reliable compliance enforcement capabilities.
Comprehensive Testing: Addresses small to large enterprise security needs.
Enhanced Automation: Benefits public and financial sectors for test assurance.

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] is instrumental in enterprise environments within public and private sectors, offering robust network security testing and automation support. Large enterprises in financial industries utilize it to ensure cybersecurity standards, especially in cloud environments.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

CenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,743 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.