Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Rapid7 Logo
345 views|231 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Spirent Logo
185 views|117 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightAppSec and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HCLTech, OpenText, Rapid7 and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).
To learn more, read our detailed Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
RussellBurrows
Haider Jarral
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"You have various attack modules, and you also have the Attack Replay feature for the attack sequence. You can reproduce an attack and see it. That is a very good feature I noticed in this solution. It helps developers as well.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the graphical interface.""It is very convenient to get reports from the tool, which offers high-level environmental statistics.""The product’s most valuable feature is UI. It is easy to manage and find vulnerabilities in the application.""In Rapid7 InsightAppSec, a distinctive feature is the provision of a CDM for integrating web servers and web applications. To establish the connection between these applications, you only need to paste the provided CDN into your metadata. Once connected, every piece of information, including vulnerabilities, can be accessed. It also offers demo sessions.""We have seen measurable decrease in the mean time to respond to threats by 20 percent.""The solution is stable.""The initial setup for us was easy enough. We didn't face too many issues. Deployment took maybe 30 minutes. It's quite quick and doesn't cause too much trouble at the outset."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Pros →

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator.""CyberFlood is flexible.""Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer.""CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

More Spirent CyberFlood Pros →

Cons
"Rapid7 InsightAppSec needs improvement in detecting phishing pages.""We'd like to see integrations with WAF solutions.""The reporting is definitely an aspect of the solution that's in need of some work. We found that we'd try to use widgets, but often getting them to work for us wasn't very clear. They need to be more user friendly or offer better instructions.""When you add new projects for the same product, it either duplicates or replaces the scan configuration. If I run a scan for the same product with a different scan configuration, it should keep the previous scan configuration and not replace it with the new scan configuration. It should just add the new scan configuration. That would be helpful. They do keep the results as it is, but the scan configuration keeps changing. For example, I have set a scan configuration to a full scan, and next week, I want to run a new scan for the same product with some changes or new functionalities. I want to run a partial scan. Currently, if I change the scan configuration to partial, it changes the old one also to partial. That should be improved.""They should add more features. I would like to see them do a little more on static analysis and also interactivity analysis. Currently, it does very basic static analysis. It could do a little more static analysis, which is something that would help. A lot more interactivity analysis should also be there. It should basically look at security during interactivity.""The number of web applications we can scan is limited.""The product’s pricing could be flexible.""I would like more details of what the product can do."

More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Cons →

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing.""CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better.""I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule.""The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

More Spirent CyberFlood Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of this product is very cheap."
  • "They offer a good price, but I don't remember its cost. It is fair as compared to the competition. We have opted for project-based licensing, not user-based. We can add any number of users. That doesn't matter. It is worth the money."
  • "Its price is competitive. It is not expensive."
  • "I'm not sure how much it costs exactly, but I know it's expensive."
  • "I rate Rapid7 InsightAppSec’s pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "Rapid7 InsightAppSec is cheap."
  • More Rapid7 InsightAppSec Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "CyberFlood is reasonably priced."
  • More Spirent CyberFlood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:In Rapid7 InsightAppSec, a distinctive feature is the provision of a CDM for integrating web servers and web applications. To establish the connection between these applications, you only need to… more »
    Top Answer:Rapid7 InsightAppSec needs improvement in detecting phishing pages.
    Top Answer:I use the solution to check multiple websites, particularly dynamic and e-commerce websites, for vulnerabilities within the code. The tool helps identify any vulnerabilities present in the code… more »
    Top Answer:Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details… more »
    Top Answer:I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
    Ranking
    Views
    345
    Comparisons
    231
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    482
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    185
    Comparisons
    117
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    225
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    InsightAppSec
    CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
    Learn More
    Overview

    Your web applications may be complex, but your application security testing tool doesn’t need to be. InsightAppSec brings Rapid7’s proven Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) technology to the Insight platform, combining powerful application crawling and attack capabilities, flexibility in scan scope and scheduling, and accuracy in results with a modern UI, intuitive workflows, and sensible data organization. This enables you to identify XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, and other vulnerabilities with unparalleled ease. The best part? All of these capabilities are delivered via the cloud so that you’re up and running in minutes to identify the critical security risks that exist in your applications.

    Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

    Sample Customers
    CenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace
    Digicel
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Printing Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HCLTech, OpenText, Rapid7 and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Rapid7 InsightAppSec is ranked 3rd in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) with 12 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews. Rapid7 InsightAppSec is rated 8.6, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightAppSec writes "A highly scalable and robust product that enables users to automate scans". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". Rapid7 InsightAppSec is most compared with Rapid7 AppSpider, OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Acunetix, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE.

    We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.