Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Acunetix vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] comparison

Invicti and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.4, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #31. Invicti holds a 2.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.
Acunetix
Read 33 Acunetix reviews
  • 5,850 Views
  • 2,808 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] reviews
  • 756 Views
  • 318 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 22, 2025

Acunetix and Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] compete in the cybersecurity tools category. Acunetix takes the lead in web application security with its robust scanning capabilities, while Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] excels in performance testing and network assessment.

Features: Acunetix offers automated scanning, a broad vulnerability detection range, and an intuitive dashboard. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] provides realistic threat scenarios, scalable performance testing, and network infrastructure analysis.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance integration capabilities and reduce false positives. Its user interface may need updates for better user experience. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] might improve in reducing complexity during setup and offering more flexible deployment options. Better documentation for complex scenarios could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service with extensive documentation. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] requires a more intricate setup due to diverse functionality but provides efficient expert support for troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix presents a competitive pricing model, proving cost-effective for smaller enterprises and promising high ROI due to efficient vulnerability detection. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] has higher initial costs balanced by advanced features, supporting strong ROI through extensive security improvements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 871,829 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix
Ranking in Application Security Tools
16th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (23rd), DevSecOps (6th)
Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Ranking in Application Security Tools
31st
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
29th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.5%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Acunetix2.5%
Spirent CyberFlood0.4%
Other97.1%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil - PeerSpot reviewer
Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy
Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.
Read full review
Jos Badimo - PeerSpot reviewer
Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance
The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."
"The features of Acunetix have proved most effective in identifying vulnerabilities."
"One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that."
"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."
"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."
"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick."
"Our developers can run the attacks directly from their environments, desktops."
More Acunetix pros
"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."
"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."
"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."
"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."
"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."
"CyberFlood is flexible."
 

Cons

"The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans."
"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."
"Tools that would allow us to work more efficiently with the mobile environment, with Android and iOS."
"While we do have it integrated with other solutions, it could still offer more integrations."
"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."
"It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched."
"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."
"Acunetix should improve by further reducing false positives and providing more customized reports, plus better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps."
More Acunetix cons
"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."
"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."
"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."
"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."
"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."
"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."
"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."
"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."
"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."
"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."
"The solution is expensive."
"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."
"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."
More Acunetix pricing and cost advice
"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
871,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
8%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise14
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
The primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is automated scanning and detection of security vulnerabilities in web applications, websites, and APIs.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?
The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?
I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?
The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix Logo
OWASP Zap vs Acunetix
Compared 16% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix
Compared 9% of the time
HCL AppScan vs Acunetix Logo
HCL AppScan vs Acunetix
Compared 7% of the time
Invicti vs Acunetix Logo
Invicti vs Acunetix
Compared 7% of the time
Veracode vs Acunetix Logo
Veracode vs Acunetix
Compared 5% of the time
More Acunetix Competitors
Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Logo
Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Compared 66% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Compared 25% of the time
Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Logo
Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Compared 9% of the time
More Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Acunetix
October 2025
Acunetix reportDownload Acunetix product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
September 2025
Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] reportDownload Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

AcuSensor
CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
 

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] effectively minimizes network monitoring tasks with its impressive traffic generator and call flow function. Known for its user-friendliness, it supports network security testing and compliance across public and private clouds for large enterprises.

Users find Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] beneficial for comprehensive security evaluations, particularly in compliance and product testing. Its capabilities in generating SSL traffic assist in cybersecurity assessments, demonstrating flexibility and ease of use. The platform supports custom test assurance and automation, allowing financial and public sectors to enhance their cybersecurity measures. Despite its advantages, users desire improvements in ports, speed, multilingual support, browser accessibility, error reporting, and interface navigation.

What features does Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] offer?
  • Traffic Generator: Minimizes network monitoring tasks effectively.
  • Call Flow Function: Simplifies network processes for better management.
  • User-Friendliness: Enhances scheduling and usage efficiency.
  • Compliance Testing: Aids in product and compliance examinations.
  • Unauthorized File Transfer Monitoring: Ensures superior compliance performance.
What benefits should be considered in user reviews?
  • Flexibility: Supports diverse network security testing scenarios.
  • Performance: Delivers reliable compliance enforcement capabilities.
  • Comprehensive Testing: Addresses small to large enterprise security needs.
  • Enhanced Automation: Benefits public and financial sectors for test assurance.

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] is instrumental in enterprise environments within public and private sectors, offering robust network security testing and automation support. Large enterprises in financial industries utilize it to ensure cybersecurity standards, especially in cloud environments.

Keysight Technologies
 

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
Digicel
Buyer's Guide
Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
September 2025
Free Report: Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]
Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
871,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.