HCL AppScan vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] comparison

HCLSoftware and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. HCLSoftware is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #31. HCLSoftware holds a 2.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

HCL AppScan

Read 43 HCL AppScan reviews

4,377 Views
3,151 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] reviews

756 Views
318 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 22, 2025

HCL AppScan and Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] compete in the cybersecurity space, with AppScan excelling in application security testing and CyberFlood [EOL] focusing on network threat assessment. HCL AppScan appears to have an edge due to its comprehensive security features.

Features: HCL AppScan offers vulnerability detection across the software lifecycle, supports multiple programming languages, and integrates with CI/CD tools. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] provides advanced threat environment simulations, network resilience evaluation, and flexibility in network performance testing.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could enhance its scalability and multi-language support for broader adaptability. More intuitive UI improvements and quicker update rollouts may also benefit users. For Spirent CyberFlood [EOL], increased compatibility with more configurations, better reporting features, and enhanced UI would be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan offers flexible deployment options, either on-premises or in the cloud, coupled with a highly responsive support system. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] also adapts easily in various environments, though feedback suggests HCL AppScan's customer service is more effective and timely.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is known for competitive pricing and offers a high ROI due to low setup costs and wide-ranging security capabilities. Although Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] might incur higher initial expenses, it provides significant returns for businesses focused on extensive network testing.

To learn more, read our detailed HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 871,829 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

15th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st)

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Ranking in Application Security Tools

31st

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HCL AppScan	2.5%
Spirent CyberFlood	0.4%
Other	97.1%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

AnshulTomar

Cyber Security Architect and Presales Consultant at Kyndryl

Scalable platform with efficient static and dynamic testing features

We use the product for Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). By integrating AppScan into our CI/CD pipelines, aligned with Agile methodologies, we ensure that security testing becomes an integral part of the software development lifecycle The…

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase."

"Technical support is helpful."

"AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further."

"The UI was very intuitive."

"The reporting part is the most valuable feature."

"I like the recording feature."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution...The initial setup or installation of HCL AppScan is easy."

"We use it as a security testing application."

More HCL AppScan pros

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

Cons

"The penetration testing feature should be included."

"We have experienced challenges when trying to integrate this solution with other products. When you compare it with the other SecOps products, the quality of the output is too low. It is not a new-age product. It is very outdated."

"The pricing has room for improvement."

"IBM Security AppScan Source is rather hard to use."

"They have to improve support."

"I think being able to search across more containers, especially some of the docker elements. We need a little tighter integration there. That's the only thing I can see at this point."

"The solution needs to improve in some areas. The tool needs to add more languages. It also needs to improve its speed."

"IBM Security AppScan needs to add performance optimization for quickly scanning the target web applications."

More HCL AppScan cons

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

"The product is moderately priced, though it's an investment due to extensive code analysis needs."

"With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. HCL AppScan is an expensive tool."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"The price is very expensive."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

871,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	31

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives. It also requires enhancements in customer support, similar to what Veracode provides. Regularly scheduling calls with clients to discuss fe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

The primary use case for AppScan is for security purposes. I compare AppScan with other tools such as Veracode. We use AppScan for vulnerability detection and auto-remediation of vulnerabilities wi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?

The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan

Compared 11% of the time

OWASP Zap vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 66% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

October 2025

Download HCL AppScan product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

September 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] product report

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

HCLSoftware

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] effectively minimizes network monitoring tasks with its impressive traffic generator and call flow function. Known for its user-friendliness, it supports network security testing and compliance across public and private clouds for large enterprises.

Users find Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] beneficial for comprehensive security evaluations, particularly in compliance and product testing. Its capabilities in generating SSL traffic assist in cybersecurity assessments, demonstrating flexibility and ease of use. The platform supports custom test assurance and automation, allowing financial and public sectors to enhance their cybersecurity measures. Despite its advantages, users desire improvements in ports, speed, multilingual support, browser accessibility, error reporting, and interface navigation.

What features does Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] offer?

Traffic Generator: Minimizes network monitoring tasks effectively.
Call Flow Function: Simplifies network processes for better management.
User-Friendliness: Enhances scheduling and usage efficiency.
Compliance Testing: Aids in product and compliance examinations.
Unauthorized File Transfer Monitoring: Ensures superior compliance performance.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Flexibility: Supports diverse network security testing scenarios.
Performance: Delivers reliable compliance enforcement capabilities.
Comprehensive Testing: Addresses small to large enterprise security needs.
Enhanced Automation: Benefits public and financial sectors for test assurance.

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] is instrumental in enterprise environments within public and private sectors, offering robust network security testing and automation support. Large enterprises in financial industries utilize it to ensure cybersecurity standards, especially in cloud environments.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

September 2025

Free Report: HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

871,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.