We performed a comparison between Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service and Sucuri based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."DDoS Protection Service provides excellent defense in the cloud, and the implementation and migration are very straightforward."
"Provides good monitoring and has a user-friendly dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is the controller that determines when and how traffic can be moved to the cloud."
"The most important part is that Radware DDoS integrates seamlessly and provides anomaly identification, real-time notifications, and security against DDoS attacks. It also helps us with multi-layer volumetric attacks. It shields us from global botnet threats."
"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."
"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."
"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."
"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."
"We heavily relied on Radware's technical team to ensure the proper setup and configuration of VPN tunnels for cloud mitigation."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing; the product could be more affordable."
"Customization could be improved."
"Radware's management is very proactive, but Radware's lower-level staff is not proactive. You need to do a lot of follow-ups."
"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."
"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."
"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."
"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."
"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."
"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."
More Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service is ranked 19th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 4 reviews while Sucuri is ranked 18th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 6 reviews. Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service is rated 9.2, while Sucuri is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service writes "Fast mitigation, competitive pricing, and guaranteed SLA". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sucuri writes "Simple solution and good WAF". Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service is most compared with Corero and NSFOCUS ADS, whereas Sucuri is most compared with Cloudflare, AWS WAF, SiteLock, Comodo cWatch and StackPath WAF. See our Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service vs. Sucuri report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
