Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jitterbit Vinyl vs QuickBase comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Organizations saw significant ROI and efficiency from Jitterbit Vinyl, with faster application turnaround, budget adherence, and reduced development times.
Sentiment score
7.1
QuickBase delivers significant financial benefits by reducing costs, increasing productivity, improving efficiency, and enhancing business visibility.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.4
Jitterbit Vinyl's customer service is praised for its prompt, effective support and ability to adapt creatively to user needs.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase customer service excels in quick technical support with extensive resources, despite limited weekend support and occasional delays.
Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten.
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Users praise Jitterbit Vinyl for its seamless integration, scalability, reliable performance, and flexibility in supporting growing user bases and roles.
Sentiment score
7.7
QuickBase is highly scalable, efficiently managing growth in users and data, with strong support for expanding applications.
Quick Base has high potential to scale.
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Jitterbit Vinyl is highly reliable, featuring excellent uptime, solid performance, seamless integration, and 100% uptime over six months.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase is stable with minor disruptions, rated highly by users for reliability and timely maintenance communication.
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek improved metadata handling, document upload speeds, flexible design, better text editor, intuitive themes, and enhanced B2C development.
QuickBase requires better customization, UI, mobile experience, improved reporting, integrations, security, formulas, training, APIs, and cost management.
The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub.
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users praise Jitterbit Vinyl for its cost-effectiveness, transparent pricing, and valuable annual subscription model with minimal hidden costs.
Enterprise buyers appreciate QuickBase's flexible pricing, but costs rise with users; negotiating tailored solutions is advised for large enterprises.
Pricing could be cheaper.
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

Jitterbit Vinyl offers fast development, flexible integration, no-code tools, seamless migration, easy customization, robust UI, efficient workflows, and strong security.
QuickBase provides code-free app creation, customization, and efficient data management, enhancing operational efficiency with PaaS capabilities and API integrations.
This provides a unified solution without needing different databases or pipelines.
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Jitterbit Vinyl
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
27th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
24th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No-Code Development Platforms (14th)
QuickBase
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
18th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.9%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
QuickBase1.9%
Jitterbit Vinyl1.0%
Other97.1%
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2208660 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mobile Dog Product Manager at BioPet Laboratories
It has sped up the app development process, enabling us to release a public version of the app much quicker
Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles.
RS
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Empowers content management and application creation without SQL
The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for improvement in front-end functionalities. I cannot deploy and use front-end features anywhere; they must be deployed inside Quick Base. The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub. Additionally, their APIs have limitations, such as reliance on XML for backend APIs, which restricts their utility.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Performing Arts
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
7%
University
7%
Performing Arts
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business38
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about QuickBase?
The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?
Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.
What needs improvement with QuickBase?
The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for imp...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Quick Base, TSheets
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley
Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Find out what your peers are saying about Jitterbit Vinyl vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.