QlikView vs XLCubed comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Qlik and Fluence Technologies are both solutions in the Reporting category. Qlik is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3, while Fluence Technologies is ranked #30. Qlik holds a 3.6% mindshare in RT, compared to Fluence Technologies’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Fluence Technologies users who would recommend it.

QlikView

Read 163 QlikView reviews

11,555 Views
7,049 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

XLCubed

Read 2 XLCubed reviews

1,339 Views
1,058 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

QlikView

XLCubed

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

QlikView and XLCubed are competing in the business intelligence and data visualization market. QlikView often leads with its sophisticated data discovery capabilities, while XLCubed is popular for its Excel integration and detailed reporting.

Features:QlikView offers a powerful associative data engine for quick insights, comprehensive dashboards, and real-time analytics. XLCubed provides tight Excel integration, multi-dimensional analysis, and customizable reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: XLCubed supports straightforward deployment with robust documentation and responsive support. QlikView requires more initial setup but provides substantial support and training resources.

Pricing and ROI: QlikView involves higher setup costs due to its extensive feature set but promises significant ROI. XLCubed has lower initial costs, providing excellent ROI for Excel-based analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed QlikView vs. XLCubed Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

QlikView vs. XLCubed

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,889 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

QlikView

Ranking in Reporting

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

163

Ranking in other categories

Embedded BI (7th)

XLCubed

Ranking in Reporting

30th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Reporting category, the mindshare of QlikView is 3.6%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of XLCubed is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Reporting Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
QlikView	3.6%
XLCubed	1.3%
Other	95.1%

Reporting

Featured Reviews

Srdjan Grbic

Financial Controller with task of Business Intelligence Implementation at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Daily invoice analytics has become streamlined and complex data modeling is now simplified

We are not using analytics features and possibly predictive analytics and forecasting features in QlikView, although they are available. QlikView is very flexible, but we are currently using only tabular presentation of data because that is what we need. Presenting a large volume of data in QlikView with graphics can be overwhelming for the majority of people who want to see a lot of information in one picture. It would be beneficial to have AI or ML features in QlikView. However, I think they will decommission QlikView, and AI features are already available in Qlik Sense, so you would need to migrate to that platform.

Read full review

reviewer1489434

Junior Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Connection should be simplified, but it's priced well

For anyone who intends to implement this solution, I would recommend contacting technical support the first time it doesn't work. At this time, I cannot recommend this solution to others because I cannot connect. Because of the connection issues that we are experiencing, I would rate this solution a five out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Customer service and support from QlikView South Africa is first rate."

"You can switch views easily."

"Now reports are available in short time in a single source."

"We have cut Fire Department 911 response time 8-30 seconds, improved the timeliness, accuracy, and consistency of reporting, and increased compliance of firefighter training and certification, ensuring that firefighters are properly trained and improving our performance on training and certification audits from our regulatory agency."

"Our sales reps use dashboards for reporting latest inventory quantities on a real-time basis, which is critical for the business."

"This is a tool with a lot of functionality to provide any kind of reporting to customers, it has a range of solutions."

"We create BI solutions so our customers benefit from solutions that are delivered in weeks rather than months and we look good by providing timely value-for-money solutions"

"It is useful to use a tool like this to have a view of data at a point in time. You can extract and create little data sets that you can store, and then over time, you can have a view for tracking changes. Especially when you work with a relational database or a database that's a production database, the data is dynamic, but if you use QlikView, you can take a snapshot of different datasets. In your own time, you can then get insights and report, build, analyze, and draw whatever you need from the data, which is quite useful."

More QlikView pros

"I am looking forward to testing their full graphics that are available, as they looked very interesting in the demo."

"The solution has great capability, performance, flexibility, visuals, everything, and we also have a very good relationship with the consultants and the solution is also very cost effective."

Cons

"Their pricing structure doesn’t match their aggressiveness either, costing an end user $1500 for a web-based license."

"It is really old. We are moving towards converting everything into a Power BI environment. We want to have a self-service type of BI environment where different levels of users in organizations can log onto a portal and retrieve the data they need or get the necessary insights for decision-making that's important for them or their business unit. They have built a new version of QlikView called QlikSense, which probably competes with newer BI tools, such as Power BI, but they are far behind. That's why we are moving towards a newer tool that's easier to use and has more visualizations to represent the data."

"It is really missing a comprehensive semantic/metadata layer and security/data profiling can be hard to accomplish at corporate level without a high level of scripting."

"QlikView has little success by itself, so we have to go with ERP, CRM, or some planning and estimation solutions, which means other costs besides the costs of implementing QlikView."

"The performance of the Qlikview website is poor as it takes three minutes to open a page."

"I would like to see more visualisation objects features."

"The look and feel of the charts and graphs can greatly be improved."

"Scalability really depends on the size of your data and QlikView server architecture. For the biggest data sets, it could become an issue at some point."

More QlikView cons

"At this time, I cannot recommend this solution to others because I cannot connect."

"There should be a better or an easier way to establish that connection to external sources."

"It's quite a stable solution although we sometimes encounter issues internally within our IT department with regard to the structure."

"Would like the ability to be able to benchmark."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate QlikView's pricing a five out of ten."

"The pricing is moderate, in the medium price range."

"QlikView is more expensive than one of its competitors."

"My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly."

"QlikView pricing and licensing is on the high side for a small sized company, but it's competitive among its peers."

"It is not very expensive. I think it it is on par with other similar products on the market."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one being low price and ten being high price, I rate pricing a four."

"It is expensive for small companies."

More QlikView pricing and cost advice

"14,000 Pounds per year for licensing."

"I am still using the two-week trial, but at first sight, the price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user79932

Senior Manager - BI Head with 5,001-10,000 employees

Feb 4, 2015

Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho

1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	76

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?

I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QlikView?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for QlikView?

The primary use case involves analyzing data on a daily invoice level with QlikView. Building metrics using simple language, similar to what you have in Excel, is what I have found most valuable in...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tableau Enterprise vs QlikView

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle OBIEE vs QlikView

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Cognos vs QlikView

Compared 3% of the time

More QlikView Competitors

Tableau Enterprise vs XLCubed

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs XLCubed

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle OBIEE vs XLCubed

Compared 10% of the time

SAP Crystal Reports vs XLCubed

Compared 7% of the time

SAS Visual Analytics vs XLCubed

Compared 7% of the time

More XLCubed Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

QlikView

September 2026

Download QlikView product report

Buyer's Guide

Reporting

September 2026

Download XLCubed product report

Overview

QlikView enhances data analysis with its associative data model and rapid in-memory processing, providing dynamic dashboards and robust visualization, while efficient data integration allows connections to multiple sources.

QlikView offers powerful analytics and insight generation capabilities through its integration with Salesforce, enabling real-time sales data access. Its customizable dashboards are complemented by scripting for complex calculations and QVDs for performance optimization. Designed to be user-friendly, it supports ETL processes and diverse data browsing, allowing users to interact with data intuitively. However, there is room for improving licensing complexities, scalability, and self-service functionality. Additional enhancements are desired in visualization, integration with Qlik Sense, and predictive analytics support.

What are QlikView's key features?

Data Integration: Connects seamlessly with multiple data sources for diverse data access.
Associative Data Model: Enhances data discovery and analysis.
In-memory Technology: Offers rapid data processing for efficient analysis.
Customization Options: Allows personalized dashboards and visualizations.
Salesforce Integration: Provides real-time access to sales data.
Scripting Capabilities: Facilitates complex calculations and analytics.
QVD Performance: Optimizes data loading and processing speeds.

What benefits should you look for in QlikView reviews?

Enhanced Data Access: Seamless integration allows widespread data connectivity.
Rapid Insights: In-memory technology speeds up analysis.
Flexible Customization: Tools enable tailored visualizations.
User-friendly Interaction: Non-technical users can navigate data easily.

QlikView finds use in building business intelligence dashboards across sectors, integrating with Salesforce for analytics, supporting financial planning, and tracking sales. Its intuitive interface aids manufacturing companies in KPI monitoring and informs commercial decisions. The tool enhances reporting, ETL processes, and diverse data source integration, facilitating offline data access.

Qlik

XLCubed enhances data analytics by offering seamless integration with Microsoft Excel. Its flexibility provides users with advanced data visualization, facilitating efficient business intelligence.

XLCubed stands out in the data analytics landscape by empowering Excel users with sophisticated capabilities for data visualization and analysis. It enables users to create interactive dashboards directly in Excel, bridging the gap between data sources and actionable insights. With XLCubed, decision-makers can easily access critical data in real-time, improving the pace and quality of decision-making processes.

What are the most important features of XLCubed?

Interactive Dashboards: Craft dynamic and interactive dashboards that bring data to life seamlessly within Excel.
Direct Data Access: Connect directly to data sources like SQL and OLAP, ensuring real-time insights without redundant data transfers.
Advanced Charting: Utilize a wide array of chart types to represent data compellingly, allowing for nuanced data interpretation.
Slicer Support: Use Excel’s slicers for intuitive filtering and drill-down capabilities within reports.
Rapid Report Creation: Facilitate the swift creation of complex reports that are easy to share and refresh.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Increased Productivity: Save time by leveraging Excel’s familiar environment, reducing the learning curve for advanced analytics.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Seamless data integration enhances the speed and accuracy of business decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Minimize additional software costs by leveraging existing Excel infrastructure.
Scalable Insights: Support growing data needs without extensive overhauls to existing systems.

XLCubed is often implemented by industries that rely heavily on data-driven strategies, such as finance, retail, and healthcare. In finance, it enables real-time portfolio monitoring and risk assessment. Retail industries utilize it for sales analysis and demand forecasting, while healthcare benefits from the timely presentation of patient and clinical data insights.

Fluence Technologies

Sample Customers

Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.

Marshalls Ltd, BP Exploration and Production, Thorntons, Ted Baker, Bristol-Myers, Rank Group, ING Bank Genve, Cargill Value Investment, Chloride Power, Auchan, Erste, UEFA, Novartis, Porsche Informatik, Raiffeisen Bank International

Buyer's Guide

QlikView vs. XLCubed

September 2026

Free Report: QlikView vs. XLCubed

Find out what your peers are saying about QlikView vs. XLCubed and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our QlikView vs. XLCubed report.

See our list of best Reporting vendors.

We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.