Qlik Replicate vs Upsolver comparison

Qlik and Upsolver are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0, while Upsolver is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.3. Qlik holds a 1.6% mindshare in DI, compared to Upsolver’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Upsolver users who would recommend it.

Qlik Replicate

Read 18 Qlik Replicate reviews

4,009 Views
2,927 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Upsolver

Read 3 Upsolver reviews

869 Views
704 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

Upsolver

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Qlik Replicate and Upsolver based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Replicate vs. Upsolver Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. Upsolver

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Upsolver

Ranking in Data Integration

39th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Streaming Analytics (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 1.6%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Upsolver is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qlik Replicate	1.6%
Upsolver	0.7%
Other	97.7%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Shraddha Waghulde

Solution Architect at Predoole Analytics

Real-time data synchronization faces challenges with monitoring and affordability

The user-friendly interface in Qlik Replicate simplifies configuration and management of replication tasks because it is based on GUI, and users don't have to write any scripts. It is entirely drag and drop functionality. Even with zero knowledge of scripting, users can effectively use Qlik Replicate. The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature. As soon as data is entered into the source, it gets captured at target locations. This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location. Additionally, whatever operations are performed at the source, whether adding data, deleting data, or updating anything, it gets replicated at target locations. It functions as data injection from source to target, ensuring all operations performed on the source system are replicated on target systems.

Read full review

reviewer2784462

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Streaming pipelines have become simpler and onboarding new data sources is now much faster

One of the best features Upsolver offers is the automatic schema evolution. Another good feature is SQL-based streaming transformations. Complex streaming transformations such as cleansing, deduplication, and enrichment were implemented using SQL and drastically reduced the need for custom Spark code. My experience with the SQL-based streaming transformations in Upsolver is that it had a significant positive impact on the overall data engineering workflow. By replacing custom Spark streaming jobs with declarative SQL logic, I simplified development, review, and deployment processes. Data transformations such as parsing, filtering, enrichment, and deduplication could be implemented and modified quickly without rebuilding or redeploying complex code-based pipelines. Upsolver has impacted my organization positively because it brings many benefits. The first one is faster onboarding of new data sources. Another one is more reliable streaming pipelines. Another one is near-real-time data availability, which is very important for us. It also reduced operational effort for data engineering teams. A specific outcome that highlights these benefits is that the time to onboard new sources is reduced from weeks to days. Custom Spark code reduction reached 50 to 40 percent. Pipeline failures are reduced by 70 to 80 percent. Data latency is improved from hours to minutes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The system is basically user-driven, mostly operating as a local platform."

"Its capability to replicate the data without impacting the source databases performance-wise is the most useful aspect."

"Great with replicating and updating records."

"A valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is that you do not need ETL; it's easy to use—you choose two systems and it automatically replicates them."

"It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change."

"The most valuable features of Qlik Replicate are its CDC performance and trigger functions. CDC feature is important to the financial industry."

"Qlik Replicate stands out with its cutting-edge technology and its ability to handle diverse data management tasks. This powerful tool allows us to efficiently and swiftly load data into various data stores or destinations, while also enabling easy distribution across different endpoints. A notable feature is its capability to reload data from multiple sources by creating multiple tasks within a brief timeframe of fifteen to twenty minutes. This eliminates the need for manual intervention and ensures quick data loading from different tables."

"A pretty good series of connectors is one of the best features of Qlik Replicate."

More Qlik Replicate pros

"The most prominent feature of Upsolver is its function as an ETL tool, allowing data to be moved across platforms and different data technologies."

"It was easy to use and set up, with a nearly no-code interface that relied mostly on drag-and-drop functionality."

"A specific outcome that highlights these benefits is that the time to onboard new sources is reduced from weeks to days, custom Spark code reduction reached 50 to 40 percent, pipeline failures are reduced by 70 to 80 percent, and data latency is improved from hours to minutes."

"Customer service is excellent, and I would rate it between eight point five to nine out of ten."

Cons

"In the next release, I would like to see closer integration with data catalyst."

"Some features can also be overly dependent on each other. So, there is room for improvement."

"When you remote into it the Qlik Replicate UI a lot of times it just freezes."

"I am not very comfortable with Qlik support as it often goes in loops. Even priority tickets, which should be resolved in minutes, can take days."

"We'd like better connectivity."

"This product could be improved by providing more insight regarding errors. We tried to debug it, but we could not trace the error message."

"It's not possible to replicate the QVC files in data analytics."

"Some features on the graphical user interface are clunky."

More Qlik Replicate cons

"On the stability side, I would rate it seven out of ten. Using multiple cloud providers and data engineering technologies creates complexity, and managing different plugins is not always easy, but they are working on it."

"There is room for improvement in query tuning."

"Upsolver excels in ETL and data aggregation, while ThoughtSpot is strong in natural language processing for querying datasets. Combining these tools can be very effective: Upsolver handles aggregation and ETL, and ThoughtSpot allows for natural language queries. There’s potential for highlighting these integrations in the future."

"I think that Upsolver can be improved in orchestration because it is not a full orchestration tool."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"Upsolver is affordable at approximately $225 per terabyte per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?

The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

In terms of handling diverse data sources, Qlik Replicate does exhibit certain shortcomings.Other areas of Qlik Replicate that could be improved include its ability to serve as a single point tool,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My usual use cases for Qlik Replicate involve my previous organization and my current organization. I can provide my current experience. As an Australian energy provider, we have a lot of operation...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Upsolver?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was a very good experience, but it is not a direct experience because it was not my responsibility. It was in charge of the customer. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Upsolver?

I think that Upsolver can be improved in orchestration because it is not a full orchestration tool. I believe it could be better in this regard. The cost needs attention at a very large scale. I th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Upsolver?

My main use case for Upsolver is during an IT consulting project for a large enterprise running a cloud-native data platform on AWS. I used Upsolver to ingest and process high-volume stream data fr...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Data Services vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Databricks vs Upsolver

Compared 12% of the time

SAS Access vs Upsolver

Compared 9% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs Upsolver

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs Upsolver

Compared 8% of the time

Striim vs Upsolver

Compared 8% of the time

More Upsolver Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

March 2026

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2026

Download Upsolver product report

Also Known As

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

No data available

Overview

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

Qlik

Upsolver's mission is to turn engineering-intensive data lakes into easy-to-use repositories that serve 50X more data professionals compared to the status-quo today. Upsolver cuts 95% from the tedious process of preparing event data for analytics and machine learning, using a visual SQL-based interface, a cloud-native data platform and deep technology for stream-processing, indexing and eventually-consistent file systems.

Upsolver

Sample Customers

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. Upsolver

March 2026

Free Report: Qlik Replicate vs. Upsolver

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Replicate vs. Upsolver and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Replicate vs. Upsolver report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.