We performed a comparison between Precisely Assure QuickEDD and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Synchronous applications are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is the backup system."
"Drives the back-end through a powerful, well-documented API."
"What I like about Rubrik is its strong focus on security, particularly in combating ransomware threats."
"Adaptative backup and SLAs simply allow you to tell a machine to backup without taking care of the backup window."
"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. It is a very simple system compared to just about any other back up technology. It is extremely easy to use and very versatile."
"The archiving, off-of-box, is awesome. It lets you put your data where you want it and gives you the peace of mind of having more than one copy of it. And it's smart about the way that it does the archiving. It doesn't just copy one-for-one. It does all of its processing of the deduplication and compression before it sends it off to the archive, which helps with our cloud costs."
"Rubrik has made the process to manage backup and recovery painless. This frees up more time to work on other projects."
"This is a centralized tool where we are able to schedule backups and perform monitoring."
"It has also saved us time managing backups. It's pretty stable. So it sends us a report if something goes wrong, then you get a report. You don't really need to manually monitor this software over time. If something happens, you'll get an error and you'll get an email notification and then address it. We found the product pretty stable if it's configured correctly. So it has reduced management time."
"There should be more interactive dashboards."
"Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over."
"The Office 365 protection could be improved."
"Collecting logs in Rubrik is very difficult compared to other tools."
"There could be better reporting and better filtering."
"I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. There is always room for improvement."
"The interface is still slightly clunky and has room for improvement. They do work with us whenever we mention anything that needs to be done or anything that we want. We find that bringing up the management interface is a little slow and not as intuitive as we would like, but it's been getting better as it evolves."
"They support Hyper-V and it works with our CloudOut, the cloud DR, but they seem to add features for VMware first and Hyper-V gets added second or sometimes several releases after the VMware feature comes out."
"The reporting in the dashboard and reporting for extractions both need improvement. I would suggest making them easier to understand and use, not just out-of-the-box. We should also be able to customize them."
"Could be improved from an analytics point of view."
Precisely Assure QuickEDD is ranked 21st in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 2 reviews while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 84 reviews. Precisely Assure QuickEDD is rated 8.6, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Precisely Assure QuickEDD writes "Trustworthy and provides good availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Easy to use with minimal training required, innovative, good support". Precisely Assure QuickEDD is most compared with Precisely Assure MIMIX, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Zerto and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain). See our Precisely Assure QuickEDD vs. Rubrik report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
