Planview Daptiv vs SAP Build Work Zone comparison

Planview and SAP are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Planview is ranked #14, while SAP is ranked #45. Planview holds a 3.1% mindshare in PPM, compared to SAP’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

2,508 Views
1,129 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

SAP Build Work Zone

Read 5 SAP Build Work Zone reviews

1,499 Views
60 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

SAP Build Work Zone

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 15, 2026

Planview Daptiv and SAP Jam compete in the project management solutions category. Planview Daptiv often has the upper hand in intricate project tracking, while SAP Jam is more suitable for improving team collaboration and communication.

Features: Planview Daptiv includes advanced project portfolio management, resource allocation, and comprehensive task management. SAP Jam offers seamless integration with SAP applications, collaborative tools for enhanced communication, and a user-friendly social interaction platform.

Room for Improvement: Planview Daptiv could enhance user interface customization, reduce deployment complexity, and streamline its analytics. SAP Jam can improve integration with non-SAP systems, expand its feature set for task management, and offer more detailed collaboration analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview Daptiv is focused on providing substantial customer support with cloud-based deployment, though it may require a dedicated setup effort. SAP Jam benefits from smooth integration within the SAP ecosystem, offering easy deployment for SAP users.

Pricing and ROI: Planview Daptiv involves higher initial setup costs but offers greater long-term ROI due to its precise project management features. SAP Jam provides competitive pricing with lower initial costs, delivering quick returns through its efficient collaboration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Build Work Zone Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Build Work Zone

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Build Work Zone

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

45th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (150th), Enterprise Social Software (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 3.1%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Build Work Zone is 0.2%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Planview Daptiv	3.1%
SAP Build Work Zone	0.2%
Other	96.7%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

AhmedHaridy

Managing Director at Emkan

A powerful tool for managing subscriptions within the organization

It's undoubtedly more complex compared to the initial part. It depends on the requirements. You can't categorically say that HubSpot is only suitable for smaller devices; it's adaptable to various needs. Depending on the requirements, you can have a project completed within as little as six months or as long as a few years. It's a flexible solution that can cater to your specific needs. However, it's essential to start from the beginning, designing the screens and pages within HubSpot. It's somewhat similar to building a website but generally more straightforward to use. You need to input the necessary information based on your specific requirements, and it's not limited to a predefined structure. The team initiates the process with what we term as solution design, but it's more appropriately labeled as enterprise design. This initial phase involves understanding the integration points with other systems and commencing the configuration process. It's essentially the starting point for our analysis. The analysis covers several aspects, including the language requirements, integration tools for interfacing with Java server solutions, and how to effectively use these tools. All these components must seamlessly complement each other. Once the team has everything in place and confirms the tools, they can proceed to elaborate on the specific requirements. The deployment timeline typically ranges from four to six months, specifically for straightforward or standard requirements. However, in the case of a large enterprise organization with numerous legal entities across different countries, each requiring unique interfaces for various purposes, the implementation duration is highly dependent on the specific requirements. It's not feasible to provide a fixed period for such a solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"Consequently, it is the single point of truth for both our project managers and our senior leadership."

"Reporting of IT capacity available for first time, time sheets available for first time."

"I implemented for a large client of mine and saw them quickly get up and running and leverage Daptiv to help them manage their IT demand from their internal customers."

"Daptiv templates give you a world of possibilities, no matter the PMI maturity level the company has."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"The most valuable features are resource allocation and capacity planning."

More Planview Daptiv pros

"One notable feature is the "improvement training," which allows you to define groups, facilitate information sharing, enable participant rating, and establish rankings. This enables you to identify which participants are actively engaged and sharing information and which ones are less active."

"All employees, from the CEO to the warehouse personnel, have access to Jam and contribute to the news feeds and consume content."

"SAP JAM has lots of possibilities and my client is using it for very specific matters, like social collaboration."

"Properly done, this software can be a great resource for your employees to stay engaged and connected to each other and to your organization."

"It connects to SAP C4C (Cloud for Customer) and is a very useful collaboration tool for the sales, services, and marketing teams."

Cons

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"I would say there is too much work that has to go into the configuration up front and for the first 6 months to 1 year after, which costs time, money, and resources, and it is not a very advanced tool and seems interface-wise to be behind the times."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"The user interface is quirky and does not always conform to the expected Microsoft UI standards."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions i.e. to Infor ERP, Confluence, ..."

More Planview Daptiv cons

"Both layout and branding could be improved."

"Sometimes it's a bit confusing with so many options."

"Built-in integrations with other SAP products could be better. We use a SAP HCM product as well, but synching data is a tremendous issue."

"The user interface is still quite rigid."

"I'm hopeful for more integrations with SAP JAM in the future."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"You need to pay for additional languages. It is somewhat expensive and the payment frequency can be annual or monthly, depending on the choice. There are no extra costs beyond the standard license and implementation fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

16%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 10% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 7% of the time

Wrike vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 7% of the time

ITM Platform vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Slack Business - Enterprise vs SAP Build Work Zone

Compared 24% of the time

Yammer vs SAP Build Work Zone

Compared 18% of the time

SharePoint vs SAP Build Work Zone

Compared 9% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs SAP Build Work Zone

Compared 7% of the time

Quip vs SAP Build Work Zone

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Build Work Zone Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

August 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

July 2026

Download SAP Build Work Zone product report

Overview

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

SAP Jam provides a collaborative platform designed to enhance communication and streamline processes within organizations, offering tools to boost efficiency and facilitate knowledge sharing.

This comprehensive platform supports seamless collaboration, helping teams connect by integrating social networking capabilities and enterprise resource planning. Its features are tailored to meet the demands of fast-paced environments that value flexibility and connectivity.

What are the key features of SAP Jam?

Social Collaboration: Enhance team interactions with collaboration tools.
Content Management: Efficiently manage and share documents.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrate with SAP and third-party applications.
Mobile Access: Work is accessible through mobile applications.
Analytics and Reporting: Gain insights with robust analytics tools.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Productivity: Streamline work processes for higher output.
Enhanced Communication: Reduce silos with improved information flow.
Cost Efficiency: Decrease expenses associated with traditional communication tools.
Flexibility: Adapt to evolving business needs with versatile features.

SAP Jam is implemented in industries like healthcare and manufacturing, where real-time collaboration and efficient information dissemination are critical. In healthcare, it supports clinical teams with patient data sharing, while in manufacturing, it aids in aligning operations and supply chain management.

SAP

Sample Customers

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

INEOS Melamines GmbH, Medtronic, Schaidt Innovations GmbH & Co. KG, Plan International, Sailing Team Germany, Australian Department of Immigration and Border Protection, SHORE Solutions Inc., TranSystems Corporation, Day & Zimmerman, Serco Group, Harlequi

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Build Work Zone

August 2026

Free Report: Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Build Work Zone

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Build Work Zone and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview Daptiv vs. SAP Build Work Zone report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.