Planview Daptiv vs Planview PPM Pro comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Planview Daptiv and Planview PPM Pro are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Planview Daptiv is ranked #10 with an average rating of 10.0, while Planview PPM Pro is ranked #11. Planview Daptiv holds a 3.2% mindshare in PPM, compared to Planview PPM Pro’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Planview Daptiv users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Planview PPM Pro users who would recommend it.

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

3,322 Views
1,528 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Planview PPM Pro

Read 32 Planview PPM Pro reviews

5,285 Views
2,484 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Planview PPM Pro

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Planview Daptiv and Planview PPM Pro are project portfolio management solutions catering to different organizational needs. Planview PPM Pro is favored for its robust feature set and strategic management capabilities, whereas Planview Daptiv is recognized for competitive pricing and strong customer support.

Features: Planview Daptiv offers intuitive dashboards, customizable reporting tools, and flexibility, making it user-friendly for teams seeking ease of use. Planview PPM Pro provides comprehensive portfolio management features, including financial management, capacity planning, and detailed analytics, ideal for complex project handling.

Room for Improvement: Planview Daptiv could enhance its strategic management features, expand financial management capabilities, and improve analytics. Planview PPM Pro might benefit from simplifying deployment processes, offering more intuitive user interfaces, and providing faster adoption support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview Daptiv stands out with a straightforward deployment model and efficient support, enabling quick adoption. Planview PPM Pro involves a complex setup yet supports extensive customization and strategic applications with comprehensive training and knowledgeable support teams.

Pricing and ROI: Planview Daptiv is praised for lower initial costs and rapid ROI owing to its streamlined implementation and operational efficiency. Planview PPM Pro, though higher in setup cost, offers extensive features and long-term benefits, making it preferable for large enterprises seeking a comprehensive PPM solution.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Daptiv vs. Planview PPM Pro Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Planview PPM Pro

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview PPM Pro

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 3.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview PPM Pro is 3.9%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Planview Daptiv	3.2%
Planview PPM Pro	3.9%
Other	92.9%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Valentina Rada

Project Manager at Taco Cabana, Inc.

Provides good visibility and clearly shows priorities; entering tasks needs an upgrade

The solution is valuable because it gives our executives a high level of understanding of what's going on. I like the portfolio aspect that shows all the projects and the budget and you can see the priorities and whether the project is on track or not. It has good visibility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Daptiv templates give you a world of possibilities, no matter the PMI maturity level the company has."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"I implemented for a large client of mine and saw them quickly get up and running and leverage Daptiv to help them manage their IT demand from their internal customers."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

"The most valuable features are resource allocation and capacity planning."

More Planview Daptiv pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting."

"The solution's time-tracking abilities are one of the strong points. The only challenge is enabling it to the minute-level task. It's not at a project level but it's at an organization level. If I want it to be at a higher level as compared to some of the other projects where I want it to go to the nth level of a task for the time reporting, I cannot control it at a project level but it's controllable at an organization level. That's the only big challenge that I have."

"PPM Pro absolutely enables us to create reusable project templates that reflect our project management lifecycle. We had a good customer session on this, where a team utilizes portfolio management and project management of the tool very intensively. We follow all of the templates but having said that, we have so many divisions and we have so many users and project managers utilizing the tools. They have a different bunch of templates. We're not just following one or two templates. We have a number of templates that the teams are using."

"Time tracking, portfolio management reporting, and what-if analysis create visibility into project planning, resource capacity, and demand planning."

"Overall it's been a great tool to use as far as project management."

"The dashboards are one of the most valuable aspects of this solution, although, we've only developed a few that anyone's using. There is more maturity there and, of course, we're a month and a half into this, but getting our executive leadership to see these things is half the battle. I think dashboards are going to be critical."

"Portfolio tools are strong; what if planning and understanding demand is good."

"It gave us a clarity of purpose. Everybody knows what they are doing and that they are all aligned: Managers know what employees are doing. Employees know what they are doing and the managers think they should be doing. That is the clarity which really helps in efficiency."

More Planview PPM Pro pros

Cons

"I would say there is too much work that has to go into the configuration up front and for the first 6 months to 1 year after, which costs time, money, and resources, and it is not a very advanced tool and seems interface-wise to be behind the times."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"Limited unless you purchase additional support hours."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions i.e. to Infor ERP, Confluence, ..."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"The user interface is quirky and does not always conform to the expected Microsoft UI standards."

More Planview Daptiv cons

"It takes more time than it should to create a new project because we can't bulk edit things very easily. That is definitely an area that has room for improvement."

"Integrations need improvement. We have the ability now with the FLEX licensing to take advantage of the different applications. But if you want them integrated there's a really large cost associated with that. The integration should be included in the cost per license. We shouldn't have to pay these really high fees to get the systems to talk together."

"Connecting funding and strategic outcomes with work execution is a challenge right now for us. Part of what we are facing is we have a couple of drivers of where projects are coming from. One of them is our innovation group. They are just sort of tangentially using PPM Pro for recording the status of projects and not really planning them within there. We need a stronger link between our current financial reporting system and Planview PPM Pro, so we can start to more easily record our external costs in the tool."

"Based on my experience, the financial management screens have gone a long way, but I think there's still some room for improvement in terms of how you model them and the different version controls."

"The biggest things are the status notes and internal notes. They have made some great improvements these past couple of weeks, but they are still lacking a bit. There are still a little kludgy. It just needs to be a bit more straightforward with notes, copying and pasting. They've made huge improvements, but it still could do some work. E.g., for some reason, the formatting is still looking a little bit weird on selecting different fonts."

"Innotas is revamping their UI. They need to focus on their request management area."

"The calculated field area needs improvement. There are a lot of formulas and functions available to make a calculated field, but it is still not comprehensive. We process the data to represent it through a report or dashboard. Due to the current constraints, for complex calculations, we do the data processing outside PPM Pro."

"I think PPM Pro is going to release a resource self-service admin which is going to duplicate the standard groups. I think that will help us a lot because right now a standard group has their own permission and we don't know what permission is getting out to the users. After the resource self-service admin will be in place, I think we will be in a much better position in terms of the formation profile."

More Planview PPM Pro cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"Bulk volume discounts are a little better. Right now we have to buy in lots of 20 at $200 a license. That's a little steep. For example, with Service Now, I pay $48 a seat for a license."

"The pricing for me is more about understanding your own needs in the company because it is one license for one person model. So, you have to really understand how many licenses you need and what may be the influx of your staff. The good thing about Daptiv is that we just need a quick telephone call to our customer success manager if we want to increase our licensing. It takes a day or two to do. So, we can upscale very quickly. We've never downscaled, but I'm guessing if we had to, we'd have to wait till the contract completes or renegotiate a different licensing cost. So, you definitely need to understand what different types of licenses provide from a functionality point of view, and then order 10% more than you need based on the influx of staff in the company. There are costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. We have the report functionality for which we pay separately for 10 hours per month."

"We have their Flex plan."

"Because we have PPM Pro with Project place, we transitioned to the Flex model."

"Our current license is from 2019 to 2022. So for that three-year subscription, it was $60,000 for the subscription, users, platform, and connections. Then there were some add-ons. Connecting to some of our other systems like HR for that period cost us around $12,000."

"Pricing was fair and I thought it was comparable to the other ones that we looked at. Other than ServiceNow, it was the most expensive, but we knew we were going to get a lot of value for that, so we went with it. We paid $40,000 for the implementation and for the workshops."

"A collaboration of all their tools truly gets the biggest bang for the buck."

"$6 million has been the return on investment so far, and that was because of work intake. Now that we are scrutinizing the work intake and asking questions like, "Is there an alternative to your $10 million project?" We had one project come in for $10 million, scrutinize it through our gate review process, and wound up with the alternative, which was $3.8 million. So, a $6 million savings."

More Planview PPM Pro pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

18%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 10% of the time

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Wrike vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 9% of the time

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

ITM Platform vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview PPM Pro

Compared 7% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Planview PPM Pro

Compared 6% of the time

Asana vs Planview PPM Pro

Compared 6% of the time

Planview AdaptiveWork vs Planview PPM Pro

Compared 5% of the time

WorkOtter vs Planview PPM Pro

Compared 3% of the time

More Planview PPM Pro Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

October 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview PPM Pro

October 2026

Download Planview PPM Pro product report

Also Known As

No data available

Innotas

Overview

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

Planview PPM Pro offers a cloud-based platform focused on enhancing project management with high configurability and flexibility, supporting organizations in streamlining tasks and decisions.

Planview PPM Pro is recognized for its robust reporting capabilities, customizable project templates, and effective resource management. As a cloud-based solution, it enhances workflow efficiency and project visibility through integration with other tools. Features like timesheet tracking, dashboard capabilities, and Kanban views optimize resource and demand management. Although users value its functionality, there is room for improvement in areas such as capacity and financial management, intuitive reporting, and modern dashboards. Enhancements in integration with tools such as JIRA and Outlook, as well as improved task management and Agile functionality, are also desired.

What are the key features?

Configurable Platform: Offers high flexibility to adapt to changing project needs.
Robust Reporting: Provides comprehensive reporting tools for insights.
Resource Management: Helps in optimizing resource allocation.
Customizable Templates: Allows personalization of project templates.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with other tools for better efficiency.

What benefits can be expected?

Improved Project Visibility: Streamlines project tracking through enhanced dashboard capabilities.
Efficiency Boost: Integrations lead to enhanced workflow productivity.
Effective Resource Utilization: Optimizes resource and demand management with its advanced tools.
Enhanced Strategic Decisions: Facilitates informed decision-making with detailed project insights.

Planview PPM Pro is primarily used in IT project management to centralize project practices and manage resources effectively. Organizations leverage it for strategic planning, time tracking, and portfolio analytics. It supports project management offices and cross-divisional collaboration, visualizing business demand and creating detailed reports. Integration with LeanKit empowers agile methodologies and project lifecycle transparency.

Planview

Sample Customers

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

The Weather Channel, corcs, Crayola, Scan Health Plan, Vermont, Bank of the West, North West Company, University of Southern Mississippi, Jeffries, Purdue University, Chesterfield County Virginia, City of Memphis

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Planview PPM Pro

November 2026

Free Report: Planview Daptiv vs. Planview PPM Pro

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Daptiv vs. Planview PPM Pro and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview Daptiv vs. Planview PPM Pro report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.