No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

PlainID vs Veza comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

PlainID
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Authorization Software (3rd)
Veza
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
GRC (23rd), Identity Management (IM) (18th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (23rd), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (9th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (7th), Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. PlainID is designed for Authorization Software and holds a mindshare of 13.8%, down 24.8% compared to last year.
Veza, on the other hand, focuses on Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM), holds 17.3% mindshare, down 26.1% since last year.
Authorization Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
PlainID13.8%
Axiomatics Policy Server15.5%
NextLabs Externalized Authorization Management12.9%
Other57.8%
Authorization Software
Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Veza17.3%
Saviynt Identity Cloud19.8%
Silverfort12.0%
Other50.9%
Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use PlainID?
Leave a review
Guddeti Srikanth - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at Capgemini
Identity visibility has improved and access governance supports least-privilege decisions
I wouldn't say major drawbacks, but there are a few minor challenges and limitations to consider. Veza provides significant value for identity security and access governance, but one of the main challenges is the initial implementation and integration process, particularly in organizations with complex environments, multiple cloud platforms, and a larger number of applications.Connecting different systems and ensuring that identity and permissions data is collected accurately required careful planning, technical coordination, and collaboration between security, IT, and application teams. Regarding its governance and security, my experience has not been very comprehensive, but the security approach is valuable because the AI-driven security insights need to operate with a clearer framework of access control, accountability, and data protection.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authorization Software solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
12%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veza?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is much higher and the setup is very complex.
What needs improvement with Veza?
Veza can be improved as it is currently not suitable for small projects due to its high cost, complex setup, and requirement for more integration with multiple systems. Additionally, there are no e...
What is your primary use case for Veza?
My main use case for Veza is to use it for authentication and to determine who can access what and what can be accessed by the system or organization users. We set permissions for cloud platforms a...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

kuppingercole
Information Not Available