Parasoft SOAtest vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] comparison

Parasoft and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

2,343 Views
890 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 22, 2025

Parasoft SOAtest and Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] are competing within software testing and network security testing. Parasoft SOAtest holds the upper hand with its comprehensive features and continuous support.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides test automation, continuous testing, and CI/CD integration, optimizing software quality. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] excelled in network stress and advanced traffic simulation but lacked software testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance user interface intuitiveness and provide more comprehensive tutorial access. It may also improve cloud-based testing options. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] required updates in software testing capabilities and struggled with limited deployment flexibility. More robust technical support would have been useful during its lifecycle.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest integrates seamlessly with environments, aided by strong customer service, ensuring smooth implementation. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL], now discontinued, faced deployment challenges due to its lack of ongoing support, limiting its effectiveness for new users.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest demands significant upfront investment but delivers high ROI through enriched test coverage and risk reduction in software development. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] entailed substantial setup costs, and its end-of-life status detracts from long-term ROI benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), Functional Testing Tools (16th), API Testing Tools (10th), Test Automation Tools (15th)

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"Technical support is helpful."

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

Cons

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"The summary reports could be improved."

"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?

The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 14% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 36% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Acunetix vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

December 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

November 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] effectively minimizes network monitoring tasks with its impressive traffic generator and call flow function. Known for its user-friendliness, it supports network security testing and compliance across public and private clouds for large enterprises.

Users find Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] beneficial for comprehensive security evaluations, particularly in compliance and product testing. Its capabilities in generating SSL traffic assist in cybersecurity assessments, demonstrating flexibility and ease of use. The platform supports custom test assurance and automation, allowing financial and public sectors to enhance their cybersecurity measures. Despite its advantages, users desire improvements in ports, speed, multilingual support, browser accessibility, error reporting, and interface navigation.

What features does Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] offer?

Traffic Generator: Minimizes network monitoring tasks effectively.
Call Flow Function: Simplifies network processes for better management.
User-Friendliness: Enhances scheduling and usage efficiency.
Compliance Testing: Aids in product and compliance examinations.
Unauthorized File Transfer Monitoring: Ensures superior compliance performance.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Flexibility: Supports diverse network security testing scenarios.
Performance: Delivers reliable compliance enforcement capabilities.
Comprehensive Testing: Addresses small to large enterprise security needs.
Enhanced Automation: Benefits public and financial sectors for test assurance.

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] is instrumental in enterprise environments within public and private sectors, offering robust network security testing and automation support. Large enterprises in financial industries utilize it to ensure cybersecurity standards, especially in cloud environments.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

November 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.