We performed a comparison between Parallels Access and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's great that the total deployment can happen completely remotely."
"We don't have problems with stability. Everything is good."
"Parallels Access gives me full access and control of the computer, and I can do anything I want remotely."
"Parallels Access has flexible licensing policies, which is beneficial for customers who have intermittent usage or users who are on and off the system."
"It's got a very easy-to-use interface."
"It saves trips to customer sites, which saves time. I am able to get in there remotely and fix things."
"The product allows easy access to any system in case of any issues."
"This solution is straightforward to use."
"The most valuable features of I use TeamViewer are the ease of access and frequent updates."
"The product and platform work well. That is why I have stay with them so long. The stability has typically been good."
"TeamViewer is fast and easy to manipulate."
"I recommend it as a solution for remote disk users."
"The most valuable features of TeamViewer are the high performance and it is not complicated to use, neither for me nor for the one I'm helping."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing policy. The price point is pretty aggressive."
"When you want to transfer a file from your iPad or remote device to the computer, the copy-and-paste feature doesn't always work."
"The solution may not scale well for enterprises."
"One challenge we do notice is that the application is limited to Windows servers only. If a customer has a Linux server, things get complicated. They should open it up a bit to be more compatible with different types of servers."
"They could improve the reporting."
"TeamViewer is expensive, and you get a limited number of connections for your money."
"The performance could always be better."
"Sometimes it lags."
"I'm not sure if they provide good quality audio alongside screensharing."
"There is a paid version of this solution with more features available. However, they should provide more free features to the user, such as factor authentication."
"Voice communication and screen communication or face-to-face communication could be improved."
"I would like to see TeamViewer support multiple platforms."
"If were to I put myself in the seat of a small business owner, I would prefer TeamViewer to be more of a pay-once-and-own-it solution, rather than paying via a subscription model (although I am using the free version). Only annual subscriptions are available. It makes paying for it the first time seem a little daunting."
Parallels Access is ranked 11th in Remote Access with 5 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 84 reviews. Parallels Access is rated 8.8, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Parallels Access writes "Allows users to access and operate their computers remotely". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". Parallels Access is most compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Splashtop Remote Support, VNC Connect, TeamViewer Tensor and LogMeIn Pro, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, ISL Online, LogMeIn Central and BeyondTrust Remote Support. See our Parallels Access vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
