"They seem to be more readily integrating with Azure, which is great."
"The simple infrastructure of the service is very useful."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the high level of performance for the databases."
"The pricing of the solution is pretty good."
"I like having the ability to easily run Oracle Linux server instances and to deploy Oracle Middleware and WebLogic servers. Oracle's Infrastructure as a Service products are also very useful, and we're using those right now within Oracle OCI."
"The security on the solution is very good."
"Oracle is valuable for improving performance and addressing issues between the nodes of clusters for private IPs. It provides a private connection between the client and the security cluster."
"Oracle offers more of the basic functionality needs."
"PCF is open, so the applications run really smoothly and with little downtime."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring and the deployment is easier."
"Stability is not a concern with this product."
"Sometimes when we install something, we need to partition and maybe rebuild the index. This can cause some issues for performance. In the future, I would like to see more stability and fewer bugs."
"The solution isn't very mature. The on-premises deployment has more features and the cloud needs to work to match those options."
"The product could use some more development and maturity so it has more peripheral functionality already integrated."
"I work with many clouds and I would say, in comparison, others have a better presentation of services and they have clearer steps in terms of implementation."
"In a future release, they could improve by adding some form of machine learning and artificial intelligence."
"The initial setup can be a bit complex."
"Lacking in additional PaaS services."
"Specific to the Oracle Cloud; while they have been able to showcase inbuilt features for Oracle applications, what doesn't really come across clearly is what happens when you want to host, work with, or integrate with applications outside of the Oracle stack."
"It is not straightforward to setup."
"In the next release, I would like to see easy integration with external tools."
"The user interface should be simpler to navigate because it t can take time for users to learn it."
Oracle Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in PaaS Clouds with 11 reviews while Pivotal Cloud Foundry is ranked 9th in PaaS Clouds with 3 reviews. Oracle Cloud Platform is rated 7.6, while Pivotal Cloud Foundry is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Platform writes "Flexibility in supporting different capabilities and integrations make this excellent for moving to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pivotal Cloud Foundry writes "Open-source makes it cost-effective, but the interface needs to be improved". Oracle Cloud Platform is most compared with Microsoft Azure, IBM Public Cloud, OpenShift, Amazon AWS and Heroku, whereas Pivotal Cloud Foundry is most compared with Microsoft Azure, OpenShift, Amazon AWS, VMware Tanzu Application Service and Dell EMC ECS. See our Oracle Cloud Platform vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
