Oracle Access Manager vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Oracle and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Access Management category. Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.3, while Ping Identity is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2. Oracle holds a 2.4% mindshare in AM, compared to Ping Identity’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Oracle Access Manager

Read 21 Oracle Access Manager reviews

892 Views
830 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 29 Ping Identity Platform reviews

5,196 Views
2,494 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Access Manager and Ping Identity Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,837 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Access Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (3rd), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (8th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 7.1%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ping Identity Platform	7.1%
Oracle Access Manager	2.4%
Other	90.5%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Upendar G

Senior Consultant at Wipro Limited

Efficiently manage applications with secure single sign-on and streamlined operations

Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access. Its ability to consolidate applications on a single interface streamlines operations significantly. The product is highly secure and reliable, especially in managing user access across various platforms. Multi-factor authentication enhances security by requiring additional verification steps.

Read full review

MAHESHKUMAR7

Cyber Security Engineer at TECHMINDZ DIGITAL CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED

Offers multi-factor authentication and application support side of PingFederate but application only supports specific protocols

A lot of teams work with technical support, but I work with it for user issues only. You might need support with things like application swaps, application names, and application URLs. I didn't know where to find those in Ping Identity, so I contacted technical support for those issues. The support team is very clever and active. They provide end-to-end support once an issue is created. I have worked with most of the support team. I also work with the support team because I work with the operations team. I provide 24/7 support to production and non-production environments. I coordinate with application and network teams to troubleshoot critical tickets and issues related to Ping Identity solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access."

"Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible."

"From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."

"I rate Oracle Access Manager a nine out of ten."

"The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients."

"The most important functions of Oracle Access Manager are single sign-on and its integration capability with different applications."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

"The only feature we were looking for in PingID was SSO integration with our existing web app."

"It is a very stable solution."

"I would recommend PingFederate as an IAM solution for its no-code environment, single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, bidirectional services, and advanced features."

"The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."

"It is a scalable solution."

"People use the solution to secure their applications and authenticate particular processes."

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based capabilities for handling cloud applications and providing authentication and authorization through OIDC and SAML. It also supports integrations needed for both local and internal applications, including legacy applications requiring web server access."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure."

"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products."

"The solution's lifecycle management is troublesome. Also, another area of issue in the solution is the part involving documentation of certain features."

"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management."

"Sometimes if a session takes too long, you have to log in again."

"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the interface."

"I suggest Oracle make the integration process for non-Oracle applications as straightforward and easy as it is for Oracle applications."

"Although Oracle Access Manager is generally stable, we experienced issues with multi-domain configurations and web agent settings."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

"In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex."

"We can choose a drop-down to search for which certificate we have to create, which is difficult."

"Ping Identity Platform must improve its UI since its management console is complicated."

"PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration."

"The product's community has certain shortcomings that require improvement."

"Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement."

"I think that the connection with like Microsoft Word, especially for Office 365, is a weak point that could be improved."

"We have encountered instances where it is not easy to do authentication."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is a little expensive."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

"The tool is affordable."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"The product is costly."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other products. I have not dealt with the setup cost concern as we have a team responsible ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redundant nodes to load balance across multiple nodes for Oracle Access Manager and Or...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Access Manager?

My main use cases for Oracle Access Manager involve using it as an authentication server integrated with Oracle Internet Directory as LDAP, which contains the user store for authentication. We have...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Security Verify Access vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 13% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 17% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

October 2025

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

October 2025

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

September 2025

Free Report: Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.