OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs ScienceLogic comparison

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

11,993 Views
1,439 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

ScienceLogic and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence are competing products in IT operations management. ScienceLogic has an upper hand in monitoring capabilities, while OPS/MVS excels with advanced automation features.

Features: ScienceLogic provides real-time visibility and predictive insights with extensive monitoring and analytics tools. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence offers AI-driven process optimization, seamless integration, and advanced analytics. While ScienceLogic emphasizes monitoring, OPS/MVS focuses on intelligent automation.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic can enhance its application monitoring capabilities and expand integration with more third-party tools. OPS/MVS could streamline user interface design for greater ease of use and offer more pricing options for budget-conscious enterprises. Both platforms could improve their documentation for better user guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is praised for its intuitive deployment process and responsive customer service. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence provides straightforward implementation backed by dedicated support teams. ScienceLogic focuses on simplifying deployment, while OPS/MVS ensures comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers a cost-effective setup with competitive ROI. It is valued for its pricing structure. OPS/MVS, though more expensive upfront, provides significant ROI through enhanced efficiency and automation capabilities. ScienceLogic attracts with its affordability, while OPS/MVS offers long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: September 2026).

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

10th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Management (4th)

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Event Monitoring

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (22nd), Server Monitoring (9th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (17th), IT Operations Analytics (9th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th), AIOps (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 4.4%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 7.1%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ScienceLogic	7.1%
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence	4.4%
Other	88.5%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sakkamon Rapeepisarn

System Programmer at Krungsri

Automation has improved alerts and file handling but script-based setup still needs simplification

OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is the automation tool I use. I think OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is good for creating complex rules because it's coding, but it takes time to learn how to use it. OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence works well if you know the syntax very well and you have experience in creating scripts or REXX syntax; it would be very good and is a good tool, but it takes time to learn, so that is for experienced staff to work with. I would rate the product a six from one to ten. I cannot think of any additional features in the next release of OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."

"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem."

"OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence works well if you know the syntax very well and you have experience in creating scripts or REXX syntax; it would be very good and is a good tool, but it takes time to learn, so that is for experienced staff to work with."

"It is an easy product to use and it is stable."

"I would say yes, definitely use it."

"When selecting a vendor, the most important thing is the ability to meet our needs, and CA does a very good job of that."

"What I like about it personally is that I can go out and interrupt what's going on and bring a job down if I need to, and bring it back up."

"Stability is probably the best out-of-the-box. Put it in, set it up, and you leave it alone. It works wonderfully."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

"The whole platform overall is very powerful."

"It is simple."

"The Power Packs that are available are amazing."

"After deploying ScienceLogic in our infrastructure and configured IT services around our critical applications we have experienced a considerable drop in major incidents which impact our customers."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"The support's been fantastic."

"Overall, I really like the product, and I recommend it."

"We chose the ScienceLogic platform because it really met and exceeded all of the requirements that we had put forth in the RFI."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"I think, for me, I’d like to see more of its web base."

"The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better."

"I've seen a mobile app that allows you to get the system status from your phone. That's a really nice feature that I’d like to see."

"The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented."

"The only issue we have is when we try to integrate with common services."

"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"Use the professional services proposed solution to support private MIBs, we are encountering what appears to be poling time outs, which creates false positives."

"Overall monitoring capabilities could be improved. We run into instances where we are not able to configure monitoring for specific things and it requires quite a bit of manual labor to accomplish these tasks."

"Turning it on was pretty straightforward but getting it configured was a Herculean task and a lot of work."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"One of the main areas for improvement would be the reporting section of ScienceLogic."

"I see room to do better in the network and SNMP trap processing."

"Reporting is still a gigantic pain point, we invest a lot of cycles in manufacturing reports off-board -#notfun."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

20%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

My impressions on OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is that it's quite difficult to use, as it relies mainly on the coding syntax and doesn't provide an easy-to-use GUI. OPS_MVS should have an easy-t...

What is your primary use case for OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

We use the auto-purge transaction for some transactions that run very long, and we also use automation to open and close files in CICS as well.

What advice do you have for others considering OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

What is your primary use case for ScienceLogic?

Our usual use case of ScienceLogic is as a strategic monitoring tool for all the customers in our company, and because of that reason, all the accounts and projects are migrated from other monitori...

SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 9% of the time

BMC AMI Ops vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 8% of the time

CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 8% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

No data available

Overview

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is designed for effective mainframe automation with flexibility and user convenience, offering tools for synchronized operations and comprehensive platform automation.

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence provides robust automation features that streamline mainframe operations, enhancing task synchronization and minimizing manual interventions. Its adaptability across multiple platforms, integration capabilities, and support for ad hoc operations ensure an efficient automation environment. However, users identify potential improvements in setup, third-party compatibility, graphical interfaces, and documentation. While it serves diverse automation needs, enhancing web interfaces and API accessibility could further improve user experience.

What are the key features of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

Automatic IPL and Shutdown: Ensures orderly system startups and shutdowns.
System State Manager: Offers synchronized task operations for consistent system states.
OPSLOG: Enables message filtering to streamline communications.
Global Variables: Facilitates script customization and variable management.
OPS/REXX Support: Supports ad hoc operations for versatility in automation tasks.

What benefits and ROI can organizations expect?

Labor Minimization: Reduces manual task handling through automation.
Comprehensive Integration: Seamless connection with legacy applications for smooth operations.
Resource Control: Efficient management of resources across LPARs.
Enhanced Workflow Management: Improved automation of time-critical functions.

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is widely deployed in industries requiring high-level automation for mainframe environments. Organizations benefit from its capabilities in message suppression, system activity monitoring, startup and shutdown management, and resource control. Its efficient automation helps in inventory control and ensures seamless function integrations within diverse operational settings.

Broadcom

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

Sample Customers

Tieto

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic