OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs ScienceLogic comparison

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

611 Views
436 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

ScienceLogic and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence are competing products in IT operations management. ScienceLogic has an upper hand in monitoring capabilities, while OPS/MVS excels with advanced automation features.

Features: ScienceLogic provides real-time visibility and predictive insights with extensive monitoring and analytics tools. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence offers AI-driven process optimization, seamless integration, and advanced analytics. While ScienceLogic emphasizes monitoring, OPS/MVS focuses on intelligent automation.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic can enhance its application monitoring capabilities and expand integration with more third-party tools. OPS/MVS could streamline user interface design for greater ease of use and offer more pricing options for budget-conscious enterprises. Both platforms could improve their documentation for better user guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is praised for its intuitive deployment process and responsive customer service. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence provides straightforward implementation backed by dedicated support teams. ScienceLogic focuses on simplifying deployment, while OPS/MVS ensures comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers a cost-effective setup with competitive ROI. It is valued for its pricing structure. OPS/MVS, though more expensive upfront, provides significant ROI through enhanced efficiency and automation capabilities. ScienceLogic attracts with its affordability, while OPS/MVS offers long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: April 2025).

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Management (6th)

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Event Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (27th), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (24th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th), AIOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 2.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 7.5%, up from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

it_user351621

IT System Analyst - Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The ability to use command rules is great when our operators have repetitive tasks, but we'd like to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is.

One of the things we've been wanting to do is to be able to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is. For example, we'd like to be able to create some generic automation when we receive a warning or alert message to allow, if nothing else, the automation team to know so we can contact the product owner. If there's something we can do to automate or expedite notification to the proper people, we want to try to do that.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can and interrupt what's going on, bring a job down if I need to, and bring it back up."

"Because we can define complex commands, the training of new operators is quicker. We can also put checks in place, that will prevent user errors."

"It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."

"It reduces the number of repetitive motions required by a human to respond to the system."

"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem."

"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."

"The documentation is simple, easy to follow, and use. A limited, first-time systems programmer can do it, in that it is out-of-the-box almost functional."

"The service has been wonderful. I like the people that I have had to deal with. The process is very straightforward. I call or use the website."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"It is simple."

"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."

"Power packs."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented."

"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."

"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."

"Some of the command sequences are too long."

"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."

"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Logistics Company

21%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...

See all answers

Comparisons

CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 100% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 11% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 8% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

No data available

Overview

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Broadcom

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Tieto

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic