OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs ScienceLogic comparison

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

4,294 Views
515 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

ScienceLogic and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence are competing products in IT operations management. ScienceLogic has an upper hand in monitoring capabilities, while OPS/MVS excels with advanced automation features.

Features: ScienceLogic provides real-time visibility and predictive insights with extensive monitoring and analytics tools. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence offers AI-driven process optimization, seamless integration, and advanced analytics. While ScienceLogic emphasizes monitoring, OPS/MVS focuses on intelligent automation.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic can enhance its application monitoring capabilities and expand integration with more third-party tools. OPS/MVS could streamline user interface design for greater ease of use and offer more pricing options for budget-conscious enterprises. Both platforms could improve their documentation for better user guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is praised for its intuitive deployment process and responsive customer service. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence provides straightforward implementation backed by dedicated support teams. ScienceLogic focuses on simplifying deployment, while OPS/MVS ensures comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers a cost-effective setup with competitive ROI. It is valued for its pricing structure. OPS/MVS, though more expensive upfront, provides significant ROI through enhanced efficiency and automation capabilities. ScienceLogic attracts with its affordability, while OPS/MVS offers long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: December 2025).

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 879,443 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

10th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Management (6th)

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Event Monitoring

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (16th), Server Monitoring (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th), AIOps (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 3.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 6.2%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ScienceLogic	6.2%
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence	3.8%
Other	90.0%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Greg Payne

Sr. Analyst/Technology Infrastructure at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It automates responses, preventing issues from becoming more severe

I just installed version 12.3, which actually already has a number of new features. It's going to make it easier for some of our new users. I'm old-school, I learned it the old way. I actually want to go back and implement it and start doing things the new way. As I need to train people, it's going to make it easier for them and make the learning curve much shorter. The new release addressed some shortcomings of the product. It was old-school. The learning curve was a little bit long in the beginning, but it's really come a long way.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."

"I do not have to keep recordings. It is there and is proactive. It helps the operators, human editors, and me."

"It allows us to respond faster to issues. If there are issues that come out, we're able to capture a message and alert somebody about it."

"I can and interrupt what's going on, bring a job down if I need to, and bring it back up."

"Valuable features include: SSM, which provides for orderly startup and shutdown; OPSLOG, which enables filtering by message-id, and/or jobname(s); Rules, as OPS/REXX interface streamlines deployment, interfaces easily with JES2 and z/OS."

"Once automatic IPL has been defined, anyone can perform an IPL with very little intervention. We know that all of the components will be started correctly."

"The follow-up surprised me. Making sure that I am happy with what I have gone to them on. They will call after I have made changes and verify that I am happy with the changes that I did have to make. If it did not fix the complete problem, they go back over it until I am satisfied."

"The service has been wonderful. I like the people that I have had to deal with. The process is very straightforward. I call or use the website."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

"It is simple."

"Power packs."

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."

"Some of the command sequences are too long."

"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."

"The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"They need a little more self-service."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Logistics Company

16%

Educational Organization

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC AMI Ops vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 22% of the time

IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 17% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 13% of the time

SCOM vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 12% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

No data available

Overview

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Broadcom

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

Sample Customers

Tieto

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic