OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs ScienceLogic comparison

Broadcom and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #13, while ScienceLogic is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7. Broadcom holds a 3.4% mindshare in EM, compared to ScienceLogic’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 27 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews

527 Views
290 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

4,007 Views
521 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

ScienceLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

ScienceLogic and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence are competing products in IT operations management. ScienceLogic has an upper hand in monitoring capabilities, while OPS/MVS excels with advanced automation features.

Features: ScienceLogic provides real-time visibility and predictive insights with extensive monitoring and analytics tools. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence offers AI-driven process optimization, seamless integration, and advanced analytics. While ScienceLogic emphasizes monitoring, OPS/MVS focuses on intelligent automation.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic can enhance its application monitoring capabilities and expand integration with more third-party tools. OPS/MVS could streamline user interface design for greater ease of use and offer more pricing options for budget-conscious enterprises. Both platforms could improve their documentation for better user guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is praised for its intuitive deployment process and responsive customer service. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence provides straightforward implementation backed by dedicated support teams. ScienceLogic focuses on simplifying deployment, while OPS/MVS ensures comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers a cost-effective setup with competitive ROI. It is valued for its pricing structure. OPS/MVS, though more expensive upfront, provides significant ROI through enhanced efficiency and automation capabilities. ScienceLogic attracts with its affordability, while OPS/MVS offers long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Management (7th)

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Event Monitoring

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (26th), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (19th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th), AIOps (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 3.4%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 7.1%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ScienceLogic	7.1%
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence	3.4%
Other	89.5%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Greg Payne

Sr. Analyst/Technology Infrastructure at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It automates responses, preventing issues from becoming more severe

I just installed version 12.3, which actually already has a number of new features. It's going to make it easier for some of our new users. I'm old-school, I learned it the old way. I actually want to go back and implement it and start doing things the new way. As I need to train people, it's going to make it easier for them and make the learning curve much shorter. The new release addressed some shortcomings of the product. It was old-school. The learning curve was a little bit long in the beginning, but it's really come a long way.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a very stable product. I very much like the SSM stuff in it. The rules engine, it's awesome."

"The service has been wonderful. I like the people that I have had to deal with. The process is very straightforward. I call or use the website."

"OPS/REXX is valuable because it allows us almost unlimited flexibility in automating our system."

"If something breaks and it goes down when it's not supposed to, automation brings it right back up."

"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem."

"It's very secure, because it's a legacy application."

"I can and interrupt what's going on, bring a job down if I need to, and bring it back up."

"It is an easy product to use and it is stable."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"A major benefit is eliminating visibility gaps, which motivates me to consolidate tools."

"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."

"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented."

"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."

"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."

"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."

"Some of the command sequences are too long."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."

"It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Logistics Company

20%

Educational Organization

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 20% of the time

BMC AMI Ops vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 19% of the time

SCOM vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 17% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 14% of the time

IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 14% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

August 2025

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

August 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

No data available

Overview

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Broadcom

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

Sample Customers

Tieto

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic

September 2025

Free Report: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. ScienceLogic report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.