OpenText Silk Test vs Qualibrate comparison

Read 5 Qualibrate reviews

1,432 Views
1,074 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and Qualibrate are competing products in the realm of automated testing solutions. While OpenText Silk Test provides robust features and capabilities, Qualibrate stands out due to its ease of integration and intuitive design, closely aligning with business workflows for a potentially more efficient ROI.

Features: OpenText Silk Test provides comprehensive testing solutions with extensive support for various technologies and platforms, powerful automation of complex test cases, and detailed reporting. Meanwhile, Qualibrate offers a user-friendly experience with its intuitive interface, process-driven testing features, and low-code approach enabling quick onboarding.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could enhance ease-of-use in complex scenarios and simplify its user interface. Additionally, quicker adaptability for smaller enterprises could be improved. Qualibrate may benefit from more robust capabilities for extremely complex testing environments, expanded support for diverse technologies, and enhanced reporting features to match more extensive solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test provides flexible deployment options for various environments, though it necessitates skilled resources for effective use. Qualibrate, with its cloud-based model, allows for quicker deployment and offers responsive customer service, simplifying initial setup and ongoing maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test involves a higher initial investment due to its extensive feature set, potentially leading to a longer ROI period. In contrast, Qualibrate's competitive pricing structure focuses on efficiency, often resulting in a faster ROI, appealing to companies looking to minimize costs while maximizing productivity.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. Qualibrate Report (Updated: June 2026).

OpenText Silk Test vs. Qualibrate

Download the complete report

Helped 902,417 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualibrate

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

32nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

21st

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

28th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualibrate is 1.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Silk Test	2.0%
Qualibrate	1.4%
Other	96.6%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

it_user1760325

Test Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently

The most valuable feature is the way it works, the usability. From the first setup, the user interface is the most beautiful. It's very nice the way you can recover things and make it work. We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate. Because everything we do is in SAP Solution Manager, we are now able to do test automatization, combined with Qualibrate. All the defects are available in SAP Solution Manager and all the changes will be in Qualibrate, immediately. From Qualibrate, we see whether tests are good or not. We can create a test-related incident in Solution Manager for those that are not good, and Test Suite in Solution Manager will notify the person who has to rebuild it. That works very nicely.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Silk4J feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"It speeds up testing efforts."

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"The OCR recognition is great, way over Sikulix or Robot Framework."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting, as you get a single frame of reporting across all the various tests and the program is very user-friendly."

More OpenText Silk Test pros

"Overall, we are really happy with it."

"What Qualibrate makes very easy to do is to record a process flow. Within five minutes you have a clear document produced by Qualibrate. Instead of using Word, and copying and pasting pictures into it from printscreens, within five minutes what you have was easy to make and it's easy for users to use."

"The most valuable feature is that it's user-friendly."

"Before Qualibrate, we did a release in about three months, and the regression testing would take us about three weeks with 15 people; now, we do it in one night."

"With Qualibrate, when we looked at the time and resources we are saving it was €1.5 million per year, mostly because of the move away from manual testing."

"The widget's ease of use is the most valuable, which means it allows you or business people to record the automated test scripts. In most cases, it is really good because it is the business people who actually know how the system is being used. The simplicity of the design is valuable, where you can record your transactions, then create your automated scripts. You can automate it at the same time, and the automation features are cool."

"If you look at it from an overall perspective, where you look at the time that we typically would spend on testing, then it is probably a bit more like 60 to 70 percent time savings."

"We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate."

More Qualibrate pros

Cons

"GUI interface could be simpler for non-developers."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"The initial setup is somewhat complex if you're deploying on-prem."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help."

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"The browser based testing needs to be improved."

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

More OpenText Silk Test cons

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate."

"Their support has been quite good overall, but there have been some frustrations recently where we just feel like we're not always being heard."

"We had an issue with SAP when using PDF forms. That was something that was not supported by Qualibrate, but we solved that issue by choosing another solution. That was the only wish we had with Qualibrate."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine. It does have reporting, i.e., a dashboard, but it is preconfigured, predefined KPIs and datasets. That could be improved because the datasets don't have descriptions, so you really need to know what you're doing. Whereas, it would be great if it could have more descriptions and be easy to build your own KPIs."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate. There is a development tool called xpath and you have to program it. We always thought it wouldn't be necessary to program it with Qualibrate, that everything could be solved by Qualibrate without programming, but you have to program some things. Using xpath is more complicated, and not easy for everybody. It would be helpful if there were a no-code solution for this."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine."

"There is a module that we would like to have. We would like Qualibrate to design a requirements module so that we can design our testing, our flows, and our scenarios based on our actual requirements. Right now, we're doing that, but we're having to do it outside of Qualibrate. For example, in Excel, we might have a list of 50, 60, or 70 different requirements and combinations of tests that need to be executed, and since that module doesn't exist in Qualibrate, we're doing it offline. We have already vocalized that wishlist to them, and they have acknowledged it, but I have no idea when they're going to get around to deploying something like that. It is probably number one on our list."

"What I would really like to see is if you are running scripts in Qualibrate, and there is a defect, then you can have it automatically raise a defect in your own ticketing system."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Qualibrate is realistically priced. I can't compare it because I haven't looked at other tools, but I think it is good. What I like is you can simply add new users, if you want. It has a license model that comes with different types of users, which I think makes sense."

"Automated testing is not cheap. But other companies, for example, Panaya, required a minimum of 10 licenses. Qualibrate allowed us to start small, with three licenses, with a price that was competitive within the market."

"We signed a three-year contract and the pricing is in line with our expectations."

"I compared the prices of the 15 solutions we looked at. Qualibrate was the most valuable because it could be integrated with SAP Solution Manager."

"We probably have 10 licenses, but I don't know what are the costs or anything like that."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silk Test?

The pricing depends on the license used. The pricing is similar to others in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Silk Test?

The pricing could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Silk Test?

The product is used for manual, functional, and performance testing. I'm using the tool for loading data into ERP systems.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 6% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Qualibrate

Compared 10% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Qualibrate

Compared 9% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Qualibrate

Compared 7% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Qualibrate

Compared 6% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Qualibrate

Compared 3% of the time

More Qualibrate Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Silk Test

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Download Qualibrate product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

No data available

Overview

OpenText Silk Test is a versatile automated testing tool known for its advanced scripting and recording capabilities in Visual Studio. It offers robust test case management, supporting cross-browser testing and seamless integration with Java and C#, providing a stable environment for automation.

OpenText Silk Test supports GUI object recognition and offers a user-friendly interface that facilitates multi-language support. It enhances test design with its object-oriented approach and integrates performance testing tools for precise data-driven tests. Silk Test excels in browser testing and performance testing across web applications, making it a comprehensive choice for regression testing, SAP automation, and performance analysis.

What are the key features of OpenText Silk Test?

Scripting and Recording Capabilities: Integrates with Visual Studio for efficient script creation.
Cross-Browser Testing: Supports multiple browsers ensuring comprehensive coverage.
GUI Object Recognition: Enhances automation accuracy with reliable object identification.
Multi-Language Support: Facilitates diverse testing environments.
Robust Reporting: Detailed insights into testing processes and outcomes.
SAP Testing Functionality: Optimizes SAP project performance.

What benefits can users expect from OpenText Silk Test?

Enhanced Test Efficiency: Streamlines automation processes for faster results.
Comprehensive Test Management: Manages test cases systematically for improved organization.
Improved Accuracy in Automation: Reduces errors with precise object recognition.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities.
Performance Testing Integration: Identifies and resolves bottlenecks efficiently.

OpenText Silk Test is widely implemented in industries requiring high precision in data handling and performance analysis. It is commonly used in financial services for month-end regression testing and SAP projects for effective automation. Manual, functional, and performance testing in ERP systems further showcases its diverse application in complex business environments.

OpenText

Qualibrate is a leading solution for test automation, offering a low-code approach that simplifies automation tasks. Its integration with SAP Solution Manager ensures efficient test management, making it an ideal choice for organizations looking to streamline their testing processes.

Qualibrate provides user-friendly features that make test script recording and automation accessible to business personnel. It facilitates the reduction of transactions into end-to-end processes, allowing for seamless changes. The tool's integration with SAP Solution Manager enhances test planning, execution scheduling, and process flow management. Users utilize Qualibrate mainly for regression and user acceptance testing within SAP applications, automating standard change processes, and transitioning from manual to automated testing. Its capability to integrate with systems like ServiceNow and host operations in the cloud highlights its versatility in managing critical applications.

What are Qualibrate's most important features?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies test script recording with low-code features.
SAP Integration: Streamlines test management with SAP Solution Manager.
Test Planning: Offers scheduling tools for test execution.
End-to-End Processes: Allows conversion of transactions into comprehensive processes.
Dummy Data Reduction: Minimizes unnecessary data in testing environments.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Reduces manhours through automation of regression testing.
SAP Optimization: Enhances testing strategies specifically for SAP applications.
Cloud Hosting: Ensures reliable testing of critical applications in the cloud.
System Integration: Seamlessly operates with platforms like ServiceNow.

In industries heavily reliant on SAP applications, Qualibrate plays a key role in transitioning from manual to automated regression testing, significantly reducing development complexity. Organizations employing this tool can expect streamlined operations, especially in sectors requiring frequent updates and changes to SAP environments.

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,

OpenText Silk Test vs. Qualibrate