OpenText Silk Test vs Panaya Test Dynamix comparison

OpenText and Panaya are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Panaya is ranked #21. OpenText holds a 1.5% mindshare in FT, compared to Panaya’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Panaya users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

1,149 Views
827 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Panaya Test Dynamix

Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews

1,336 Views
868 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

Panaya Test Dynamix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and Panaya Test Dynamix are both competitors in the automated software testing category. Panaya Test Dynamix has the upper hand due to its feature richness, providing a high value for investment despite its higher pricing.

Features: OpenText Silk Test supports test automation for web, mobile, and enterprise applications, offering cross-platform support, robust test automation capabilities, and ease in handling testing scenarios. Panaya Test Dynamix includes end-to-end business process testing, change impact analysis, and extensive testing features tailored for business agility.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could improve in areas like more dynamic integration options, enhanced reporting capabilities, and a more intuitive user interface. Panaya Test Dynamix may benefit from reducing initial costs, minimizing setup complexity, and improving ease of use for smaller teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test offers straightforward setup and reliable support services, making it accessible to various teams. Panaya Test Dynamix aligns with complex enterprise environments, providing effective customer service to larger organizations.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test is cost-effective, appealing to budget-focused businesses with a swift ROI. Panaya Test Dynamix, though more costly initially, promises substantial long-term ROI with its extensive features, especially for companies invested in digital transformation.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,768 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (17th)

Panaya Test Dynamix

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

21st

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Defect Tracking (4th), Test Management Tools (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 1.9%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Silk Test	1.5%
Panaya Test Dynamix	1.9%
Other	96.6%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

Alain Vanhaeght

IT Project leader at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options

For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."

"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."

"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary."

"It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools."

"The test repository to follow the test progress is most valuable because we can easily create and manage a huge number of test scripts. We can copy and paste, replicate, and drag and drop many tests scripts. We can create test scripts en masse. When you have a high volume of tests, the tool is quite useful. It works well when you want to manage a lot of tests, such as you have 1,000 or more test scripts."

"The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use."

"Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format."

"Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing."

Cons

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

"The pricing could be improved."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"Support is reactive and in English only."

"They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great."

"It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories and we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we have a network connection."

"The setup of Panaya Recorder is a bit complex. Panaya is a SaaS application, but you need to install some components on your computer. You need to set up your computer to allow Panaya Recorder to work. There are five or six things to do each time you install Panaya for any user. If you miss something, Panaya Recorder doesn't work. So, it is complex to install."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

"It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a basic license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silk Test?

The pricing depends on the license used. The pricing is similar to others in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Silk Test?

The pricing could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Silk Test?

The product is used for manual, functional, and performance testing. I'm using the tool for loading data into ERP systems.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 21% of the time

Qt Squish vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 11% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 45% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 9% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Rational ClearQuest vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 5% of the time

More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

December 2025

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

January 2026

Download Panaya Test Dynamix product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

No data available

Overview

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

OpenText

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

Panaya

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Silk Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Test vs. Panaya Test Dynamix report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.