Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024
Parasoft Development Testing Platform and OpenText Silk Central compete in the software testing solutions market. Parasoft appears to have the upper hand in comprehensive automated testing features, while OpenText Silk Central is recognized for powerful test management capabilities.
Features: Parasoft stands out for its extensive automated test generation and execution, integrated code analysis, and support for multiple programming languages. OpenText Silk Central is recognized for its robust test planning and management, flexible test execution options, and detailed reporting features.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft could improve its learning curve, enhance documentation to be more user-friendly, and address performance issues with large-scale tests. OpenText Silk Central needs more intuitive navigation, better support for new integrations, and less cumbersome maintenance and setup.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft offers straightforward deployment options but requires significant initial configuration impacting time-to-deployment. Its customer service received mixed reviews. OpenText Silk Central’s deployment is relatively more complex but supported by comprehensive vendor guidance. Customer service for OpenText received generally positive feedback.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft is considered cost-effective over time with substantial ROI due to reduced testing times and early bug detection, though initial setup costs are higher. OpenText Silk Central’s pricing is higher, but the investment is seen as justified due to extensive features and long-term benefits, leading to decent ROI.
