ConformIQ Creator vs OpenText Silk Central comparison

Conformiq and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Conformiq is ranked #22, while OpenText is ranked #21. Conformiq holds a 1.3% mindshare in TMT, compared to OpenText’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Conformiq users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

ConformIQ Creator

Read 3 ConformIQ Creator reviews

217 Views
38 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Central

Read 9 OpenText Silk Central reviews

269 Views
64 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

ConformIQ Creator

OpenText Silk Central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

OpenText Silk Central and ConformIQ Creator are both prominent test management tools. ConformIQ Creator has the upper hand in overall user satisfaction based on ease of use and feature set.

Features: OpenText Silk Central is notable for comprehensive traceability, robust reporting capabilities, and a robust feature set. ConformIQ Creator stands out for advanced automation, intuitive process design, and cutting-edge automation features.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Central lacks frequent updates, needs better integration with third-party tools, and has mixed reviews on customer service. ConformIQ Creator faces occasional stability issues, a steeper learning curve, and complexity in deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Central offers straightforward deployment but has mixed reviews on customer service. ConformIQ Creator, while complex to deploy, benefits from highly responsive and supportive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Central offers competitive pricing and is deemed cost-effective. ConformIQ Creator, despite being more expensive, provides a higher ROI due to advanced features and efficiency gains, making users find its benefits justify the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed ConformIQ Creator vs. OpenText Silk Central Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ConformIQ Creator vs. OpenText Silk Central

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ConformIQ Creator

Ranking in Test Management Tools

22nd

Ranking in Test Design Automation

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (23rd)

OpenText Silk Central

Ranking in Test Management Tools

21st

Ranking in Test Design Automation

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of ConformIQ Creator is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Silk Central is 1.6%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1518657

QE Manager at Capgemini

Feature-rich stable tool with multiple options to control output, good integration with other tools, and knowledgeable support team

The core functionality of the tool is automated test generation of optimized test suite; the tool has extensive list of options for the same. The product's integration with other tools sets it apart. It has integrations with many upstream (for requirements mapping) and downstream (export of test cases to various tools) products. It is like "plug-and-play". For any customized downstream tool, like our proprietary automation framework, support is provided for custom development. It is has features - Business AD - to use in Agile implementations. The latest version seems to have support for BDD/Gherkin as well, which we have not used much.

Read full review

it_user685080

Test Governance at Poste Italiane

A powerful platform and strong technical support help us to make the right decisions

We are primarily interested in improving the flexibility to customize parts of the tool. At this point, we feel that the customization is bad. For example, we would like to be able to automatize internal projects. We would like like to see the visibility improved, and want to perform certain tests faster. We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end. This is very important to us. In terms of usability and the interface, a few small improvements can lead to a lot of benefits. The interface is good but can be improved. The section on managing requirements for testing has to be improved. This is an old feature that has not been updated at the same rate as the rest of the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool has the ability to integrate with various requirement management, test management, and version control tools."

"Though optimized and automated test generation is the core functionality, the product's integration with other tools sets it apart."

"The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."

Cons

"Even though the 4.1 version is a far-improved version from its earlier avatars, the performance of test generation is still an issue on real-time models we have."

"It would be helpful to have a feature in the tool's UI to map object locators within the system."

"I would like to see the output data optionally used as input for the model, as further action in the flow."

"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

42%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs ConformIQ Creator

Compared 39% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs ConformIQ Creator

Compared 38% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs ConformIQ Creator

Compared 23% of the time

More ConformIQ Creator Competitors

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText Silk Central

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText Silk Central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

June 2025

Download ConformIQ Creator product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

June 2025

Download OpenText Silk Central product report

Also Known As

Conformiq Creator, Conformiq Transformer

Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central

Overview

Conformiq Creator provides a solution for automating testing processes and speeding up the software development lifecycle of Enterprise IT applications. Conformiq Creator is used in various sectors, including Telecom, Banking, Finance, Insurance, Retail, and Public Sector services. Launched initially in 2013, Creator quickly gained popularity among its users for its functional testing, application testing, system testing, and end-to-end testing.

Conformiq Transformer shortens the path to test automation, simplifies model-based testing (MBT) adoption using existing methods, and automates manual test execution. Along with Conformiq Creator, which generates executable test cases, scripts and documentation from models, it automates and transforms test design, extending the Conformiq 360° Test Automation™ solution for complex system testing at the speed of development.

Conformiq

Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Alcatel-Lucent, Avaya, Daimler, Ericsson

AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University

Buyer's Guide

ConformIQ Creator vs. OpenText Silk Central

May 2025

Free Report: ConformIQ Creator vs. OpenText Silk Central

Find out what your peers are saying about ConformIQ Creator vs. OpenText Silk Central and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ConformIQ Creator vs. OpenText Silk Central report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors and best Test Design Automation vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.