SolarWinds NPM and OpenText Operations Bridge are competing in the network monitoring and management category. SolarWinds NPM holds an advantage due to its ease of deployment, robust performance, and affordability.
Features: SolarWinds NPM is recognized for its ease of deployment and strong network monitoring capabilities, including flexibility in customization. It also stands out due to its performance and affordability. OpenText Operations Bridge offers extensive integration capabilities and provides a centralized view for various monitoring needs, which is beneficial for large and complex environments.
Room for Improvement: SolarWinds NPM users recommend enhancements in network discovery, reporting, and better third-party integration. OpenText Operations Bridge, while robust, is often criticized for its complexity and resource-heaviness, prompting users to seek more streamlined processes and improved scalability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SolarWinds NPM typically provides straightforward deployment across various environments but receives mixed reviews on customer service response times. OpenText Operations Bridge is well-suited to handle large environments and hybrid setups, although its customer service is praised for technical expertise, the response for non-critical issues can be slow.
Pricing and ROI: SolarWinds NPM offers competitive pricing models, although costs may rise with added features through additional modules. Users generally report a swift ROI due to operational insights and resource optimization. OpenText Operations Bridge is considered expensive and is best suited for larger enterprises, providing value through extensive monitoring capabilities despite its complex licensing model.
The return on investment is significant as the solution effectively reduces costs while being worth its expense.
OpenText goes out to bring the right people to answer any inquiries I have.
If there is no timely response, getting a resolution is more difficult.
We had contact with SolarWinds regarding the implementation, and they were helpful.
They have good technical support.
SolarWinds NPM is scalable and effective in handling large network infrastructures.
The NPM product is stable, particularly when used for simple network monitoring.
Splunk is more business-friendly due to its prettier interface.
Customers have given feedback about the delayed response times from the technical team.
SolarWinds needs to upscale on observability and add full-fledged observability features, including security features.
From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours.
PRTG's package offers all features in one bundle, which is cost-effective.
The solution is considered expensive.
This integration ensures that when monitoring systems alert and subsequently resolve, tickets are automatically created and closed.
It provides a detailed overview of the network, which is valuable.
The most valuable feature for us is the database performance analyzer, which we use a lot.
SolarWinds NPM has specific modules for monitoring different network capabilities, which provides rich features for carrying out specific tasks.
SolarWinds NPM is a network monitoring solution that enables you to detect, diagnose, and resolve network performance issues and outages quickly and efficiently. The solution is a powerful tool that can help you increase service levels, reduce downtime with multi vendor network monitoring, simplify the management of complex network devices, improve operational efficiency, and much more.
SolarWinds NPM Features
SolarWinds NPM has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
SolarWinds NPM Benefits
There are several benefits to implementing SolarWinds NPM. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the SolarWinds NPM solution.
PeerSpot user Andrew N., Senior Network Engineer at Element Critical, says, “The "Performance Analyzer" feature is the solution's most valuable aspect. It's able to do the bounded graphs of all the interface stats, from errors to broadcasts and to current traffic. With a click of a button you're able to, in one interface, look at historical data for those items.” He also adds, “From the troubleshooting point of view, just having that peace of mind is great. And, The solution is extremely stable. We haven't had any issues in that regard. We haven't had issues with bugs, glitches, or crashes."
Daniel S., Systems and Data Warehouse Supervisor at MMSD, mentions, “The alerting and usage tracking is a valuable feature because it alerts us when we're getting near capacity on disk space, network utilization or processor utilization. It helps us manage our capacity and enables us to be proactive.”
A Senior Vice President and CIO at a financial services firm explains, “As we look to add more servers to our virtual environment and to understand the impact, the solution allows us to dig into the historical charts related to capacity planning. It also gives us visibility of spikes and allows us to track down the reasons for their occurrences. So too, it makes room for potential processes that have gotten hung or runaway and to know when it's time to reboot a server or service.”
Dinesh N., Digital Innovation at Bobcat Company, states, “The best part of the solution is the sharing display. It gives a general public ID wherein everyone can link to a public display. That's a good feature.”
Fazal A., Implementation & Support Specialist at 360Factors, comments, “We have configured multiple alerts for our network devices, including routers and switches, so that we are notified if any interface goes down. In the event an interface goes down, we have multiple reports that include availability monitoring, network uptime monitoring, and network downtime monitoring. These reports are on multiple schedules such as the end of the day, end of the last business day of the week, monthly, and quarterly. This gives us the ability to provide reports to our management and let them know the performance of our network.”
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
